Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62020CN0620

Case C-620/20 P: Appeal brought on 19 November 2020 by International Management Group (IMG) against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 9 September 2020 in Case T-381/15 RENV, IMG v Commission

OJ C 28, 25.1.2021, p. 31–32 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

25.1.2021   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/31

Appeal brought on 19 November 2020 by International Management Group (IMG) against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 9 September 2020 in Case T-381/15 RENV, IMG v Commission

(Case C-620/20 P)

(2021/C 28/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: International Management Group (IMG) (represented by: L. Levi and J.-Y. de Cara, avocats)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

—

set aside the judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 in Case T-381/15/RENV;

—

consequently, grant the appellant the relief sought at first instance as revised and, accordingly:

—

order the defendant to pay compensation for the material and non-material damage as amended in its observations after Case T-381/15 RENV was referred back to the General Court;

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

In support of its appeal, the appellant relies on the following grounds of appeal:

a.

The unlawfulness of the Commission’s conduct

1.

Failure to comply with the judgment of the Court of 31 January 2019, International Management Group v Commission (C-183/17 P and C-184/17 P);

2.

The judgment under appeal misconstrues the concept of international organisation laid down by the financial regulations: failure to respect international recognition; breach of the hierarchy of norms; failure to comply with the judgment of the Court of 31 January 2019, referred to above, and with the financial regulations;

3.

Breach of the principle of sound administration;

4.

The judgment under appeal misconstrued the concept of a sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.

b.

The damage

1.

As regards the claims in the first, second and third indents of paragraph 40 of the judgment under appeal: breach of the principle of compensation in kind; breach of the duty to state reasons incumbent on the General Court; failure to comply with the conditions governing admissibility; infringement of Article 76(e) and Article 84(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court;

2.

As regards the claims in the fourth indent of paragraph 40 of the judgment under appeal: breach of the obligation to state reasons incumbent on the General Court; infringement of Articles 76(e) and Article 84(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court;

3.

As regards non-material damage: breach of the principle of compensation in kind; breach of the duty to state reasons incumbent on the General Court; infringement of Article 76(e) and Article 84(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court; error in the exercise of the General Court’s unlimited jurisdiction.
Top