Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62020CN0477

Case C-477/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 28 September 2020 — Codere Network SpA v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

OJ C 28, 25.1.2021, p. 13–13 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

25.1.2021   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/13

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 28 September 2020 — Codere Network SpA v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

(Case C-477/20)

(2021/C 28/18)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Codere Network SpA

Respondents: Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

Questions referred

1.

Is the introduction of a provision, such as that contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which reduces commission and fees only in respect of a specific and limited category of operator, namely operators of games played on gaming machines, and not all operators in the gaming sector, compatible with the exercise of the freedom of establishment guaranteed by Article 49 TFEU and with the exercise of the freedom to provide services guaranteed by Article 56 TFEU?

2.

Is the introduction of the abovementioned provision contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which for economic reasons alone reduced the fees agreed to in a concession agreement concluded between a company and an Italian State authority during the term of that agreement, compatible with the EU-law principle of the protection of legitimate expectations?
Top