Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62018CN0018

Case C-18/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 10 January 2018 — Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland Limited

OJ C 104, 19.3.2018, p. 21–21 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

19.3.2018   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/21

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 10 January 2018 — Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland Limited

(Case C-18/18)

(2018/C 104/26)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek

Defendant: Facebook Ireland Limited

Questions referred

1.

Does Article 15(1) of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (‘Directive on electronic commerce’) (1) generally preclude any of the obligations listed below of a host provider which has not expeditiously removed illegal information, specifically not just this illegal information within the meaning of Article 14(1)(a) of the Directive, but also other identically worded items of information:

a.a.

worldwide?

a.b.

in the relevant Member State?

a.c.

of the relevant user worldwide?

a.d.

of the relevant user in the relevant Member State?

2.

In so far as Question 1 is answered in the negative: Does this also apply in each case for information with an equivalent meaning?

3.

Does this also apply for information with an equivalent meaning as soon as the operator has become aware of this circumstance?

(1)  OJ 2000 L 178, p. 1.

Top