EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013CN0247
Case C-247/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Wiesbaden (Germany) lodged on 3 May 2013 — Rudolf Reznicek v Hellenic Republic
Case C-247/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Wiesbaden (Germany) lodged on 3 May 2013 — Rudolf Reznicek v Hellenic Republic
Case C-247/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Wiesbaden (Germany) lodged on 3 May 2013 — Rudolf Reznicek v Hellenic Republic
OJ C 215, 27.7.2013, p. 6–7
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 215, 27.7.2013, p. 5–5
(HR)
27.7.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 215/6 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Wiesbaden (Germany) lodged on 3 May 2013 — Rudolf Reznicek v Hellenic Republic
(Case C-247/13)
2013/C 215/07
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Landgericht Wiesbaden
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Rudolf Reznicek
Defendant: Hellenic Republic
Question referred
Is Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 [of the European Parliament and] of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service [in the Member States] of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters [(service of documents), and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000] (1) to be interpreted as meaning that an action — in which a purchaser of bonds issued by the defendant that were in the safe-keeping of Gries und Heissel Bankiers AG, in the securities account of the applicant, and in respect of which the applicant had not accepted the defendant’s exchange offer made at the end of February 2012, demands compensation for damages in the amount of the difference in value relative to an exchange of the bonds that was nonetheless effected in March 2012 and which was economically disadvantageous for the applicant — is to be regarded as a ‘civil or commercial matter’ within the meaning of the Regulation?