EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62007CN0476

Case C-476/07: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 29 October 2007 — M.C.O. Congres v suxess GmbH

OJ C 22, 26.1.2008, p. 23–23 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

26.1.2008   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/23


Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 29 October 2007 — M.C.O. Congres v suxess GmbH

(Case C-476/07)

(2008/C 22/44)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: M.C.O. Congres

Defendant: suxess GmbH

Question referred

Is Article 9(2)(e) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes (1), last amended by Directive 1999/85/EC of 22 October 1999 (OJ 1999 L 277, p. 34), to be interpreted as meaning that if services are supplied in connection with sports and cultural services under Article 259 A 4(a) of the Code Général des Impôts (General Tax Code) in the form of the grant to the person to whom the services are supplied of permission to advertise on surfaces, in premises where events take place and on t-shirts, then they are advertising services within the meaning of Article 9(2) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 with the result that the services are deemed to have been supplied at the place where the person to whom the services have been supplied has his place of business?


(1)  OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1.


Top