EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TB0778
Case T-778/21: Order of the General Court of 9 February 2023 — Folkertsma v Commission (Action for damages — Contract for technical assistance for support to Bangsamoro transition (Subatra) — Commission’s request to have the applicant replaced as expert — Termination of the contract between the successful tenderer and the applicant — Non-contractual liability — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Causal link — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-778/21: Order of the General Court of 9 February 2023 — Folkertsma v Commission (Action for damages — Contract for technical assistance for support to Bangsamoro transition (Subatra) — Commission’s request to have the applicant replaced as expert — Termination of the contract between the successful tenderer and the applicant — Non-contractual liability — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Causal link — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-778/21: Order of the General Court of 9 February 2023 — Folkertsma v Commission (Action for damages — Contract for technical assistance for support to Bangsamoro transition (Subatra) — Commission’s request to have the applicant replaced as expert — Termination of the contract between the successful tenderer and the applicant — Non-contractual liability — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Causal link — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
OJ C 112, 27.3.2023, p. 34–35
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.3.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 112/34 |
Order of the General Court of 9 February 2023 — Folkertsma v Commission
(Case T-778/21) (1)
(Action for damages - Contract for technical assistance for support to Bangsamoro transition (Subatra) - Commission’s request to have the applicant replaced as expert - Termination of the contract between the successful tenderer and the applicant - Non-contractual liability - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals - Causal link - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2023/C 112/44)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Rommert Folkertsma (Zierikzee, Netherlands) (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito and T. Van Noyen, acting as Agents)
Re:
By his action based on Article 268 TFEU, the applicant seeks compensation for the financial and non-material damage which he claims to have suffered following the European Commission’s request to have him replaced as an expert in the context of a European Union technical assistance project in support of the Republic of the Philippines.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Mr Rommert Folkertsma shall pay the costs. |