Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62022TN0473

Case T-473/22: Action brought on 31 July 2022 — Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik v EUIPO — Darvas and Pap (LAAVA)

OJ C 359, 19.9.2022, p. 93–94 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

19.9.2022   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/93

Action brought on 31 July 2022 — Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik v EUIPO — Darvas and Pap (LAAVA)

(Case T-473/22)

(2022/C 359/114)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi (Kütahya, Turkey) (represented by: M. López Camba and A. Lyubomirova Geleva, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gábor Darvas (Budapest, Hungary), Dorina Pap (Kiskunhalas, Hungary)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicants of the trade mark at issue: Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative LAAVA mark — Application for registration No 18 209 861

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 May 2022 in Case R 1745/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision to the extent that it maintains the rejection of the opposition and orders the opponent/appellant to bear the costs of the opposition and appeal proceedings;

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi;

—

order Gábor Darvas and Dorina Pap to pay the costs incurred by Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Top