Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62018TN0364

Case T-364/18: Action brought on 11 June 2018 — Arçelik v EUIPO (MicroGarden)

OJ C 268, 30.7.2018, p. 48–48 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

201807130582003622018/C 268/583642018TC26820180730EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180611484811

Case T-364/18: Action brought on 11 June 2018 — Arçelik v EUIPO (MicroGarden)

Top

C2682018EN4810120180611EN0058481481

Action brought on 11 June 2018 — Arçelik v EUIPO (MicroGarden)

(Case T-364/18)

2018/C 268/58Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Arçelik AS (Istanbul, Turquie) (represented by: A. Franke, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark MicroGarden — Application for registration No 16 971 988

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 April 2018 in Case R 163/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Top