EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TB0465
Case T-465/17: Order of the General Court of 18 May 2018 — VKR Holding v EUIPO (VELUX) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark VELUX — Claiming the seniority of the earlier national word mark VELUX — Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Article 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-465/17: Order of the General Court of 18 May 2018 — VKR Holding v EUIPO (VELUX) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark VELUX — Claiming the seniority of the earlier national word mark VELUX — Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Article 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-465/17: Order of the General Court of 18 May 2018 — VKR Holding v EUIPO (VELUX) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark VELUX — Claiming the seniority of the earlier national word mark VELUX — Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Article 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 249, 16.7.2018, p. 34–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Case T-465/17: Order of the General Court of 18 May 2018 — VKR Holding v EUIPO (VELUX) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark VELUX — Claiming the seniority of the earlier national word mark VELUX — Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Article 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Order of the General Court of 18 May 2018 — VKR Holding v EUIPO (VELUX)
(Case T-465/17) ( 1 )
‛(EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark VELUX — Claiming the seniority of the earlier national word mark VELUX — Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Article 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)’
2018/C 249/43Language of the case: EnglishParties
Applicant: VKR Holding A/S (Søborg, Denmark) (represented by: J. Heebøll, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 May 2017 (Case R 1927/2016-2) relating to an application claiming seniority of the identical national (Estonian) trade mark for the word mark VELUX, registered as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2. |
The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 309, 18.9.2017.