EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62006FB0080
Case F-80/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 January 2008 — Duyster v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Parental leave — Application to withdraw parental leave — Lis pendens — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case F-80/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 January 2008 — Duyster v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Parental leave — Application to withdraw parental leave — Lis pendens — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case F-80/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 January 2008 — Duyster v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Parental leave — Application to withdraw parental leave — Lis pendens — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 79, 29.3.2008, p. 35–35
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
29.3.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 79/35 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 January 2008 — Duyster v Commission
(Case F-80/06) (1)
(Civil Service - Officials - Parental leave - Application to withdraw parental leave - Lis pendens - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2008/C 79/66)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Tineke Duyster (Oetrange, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg) (represented by: W. van den Muijsenbergh, lawyer)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. Krämer, acting as Agent, and M. van der Woude, lawyer)
Re:
Annulment of the Appointing Authority's decision of 22 December 2005 declaring inadmissible the applicant's request of 6 December 2005 concerning the Appointing Authority's decision of 17 November 2005 on the date that the applicant's parental leave started
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Each party is ordered to bear its own costs. |
(1) OJ C 261, 28.10.2006, p. 33.