EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CJ0261
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2016.
Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen NV v Gregory Demey.
Rail transport — Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 — Passengers’ rights and obligations — Absence of a ticket — Failure to regularise within the prescribed period — Criminal offence.
Case C-261/15.
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2016.
Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen NV v Gregory Demey.
Rail transport — Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 — Passengers’ rights and obligations — Absence of a ticket — Failure to regularise within the prescribed period — Criminal offence.
Case C-261/15.
Court reports – general
Case C‑261/15
Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen NV
v
Gregory Demey
(Request for a preliminary ruling from the
vredegerecht te Ieper)
‛Rail transport — Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 — Passengers’ rights and obligations — Absence of a ticket — Failure to regularise within the prescribed period — Criminal offence’
Summary — Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber), 21 September 2016
Transport — Rail transport — Regulation No 1371/2007 — Rail passengers’ rights and obligations — Unticketed journey not regularised within the prescribed periods — No contractual relationship between the passenger and the railway undertaking
(European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1371/2007, Annex I, Art. 6(2))
The final sentence of Article 6(2) of Appendix A to the Convention Concerning International Carriage by Rail (COTIF), in Annex I to Regulation No 1371/2007 on rail passengers’ rights and obligations, must be interpreted as not precluding national provisions which lay down that a person making a train journey while not in possession of a ticket for that purpose, who fails to regularise his situation within the periods laid down in those provisions, does not have a contractual relationship with the railway undertaking.
Article 6(2) of Appendix A presupposes the existence of a contract of carriage concluded beforehand and relates only to the proof of the existence of such a contract. It follows that Article 6(2) does not govern the conditions for the formation of a contract of carriage, those conditions being governed by the relevant national provisions.
(see paras 26, 30, 34, 35, operative part)