EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CN0287
Case C-287/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 5 April 2019 — DenizBank AG v Verein für Konsumenteninformation
Case C-287/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 5 April 2019 — DenizBank AG v Verein für Konsumenteninformation
Case C-287/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 5 April 2019 — DenizBank AG v Verein für Konsumenteninformation
OJ C 246, 22.7.2019, p. 8–9
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
22.7.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 246/8 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 5 April 2019 — DenizBank AG v Verein für Konsumenteninformation
(Case C-287/19)
(2019/C 246/08)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Oberster Gerichtshof
Parties to the main proceedings
Defendant and appellant in the appeal on a point of law: DenizBank AG
Applicant and defendant in the appeal on a point of law: Verein für Konsumenteninformation
Questions referred
1. |
Is point (6)(a) of Article 52 in conjunction with Article 54(1) of Directive 2015/2366/EU (1) (Payment Services Directive), pursuant to which the payment service user will be deemed to have accepted proposed changes in the conditions unless the payment service user notifies the payment service provider before the date of their proposed date of entry into force that they are not accepted, to be interpreted as meaning that tacit consent can also be agreed with the consumer for any conceivable contractual conditions without any restriction? |
2. |
|
3. |
Is Article 63(1)(b) of the Payment Services Directive to be interpreted as meaning that a payment service provider can rely on that derogation only if it can be established, according to the objective state of technical knowledge, that the payment instrument does not allow its blocking or prevention of its further use? |
(1) Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC (OJ 2015 L 337, p. 35).