EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009CA0168
Case C-168/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 January 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano — Italy) — Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (Industrial and commercial property — Directive 98/71/EC — Legal protection of designs — Article 17 — Obligation concerning the cumulation of design protection with copyright protection — National law precluding copyright protection or rendering it unenforceable for a certain period in the case of designs which entered the public domain before the entry into force of the law — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations)
Case C-168/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 January 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano — Italy) — Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (Industrial and commercial property — Directive 98/71/EC — Legal protection of designs — Article 17 — Obligation concerning the cumulation of design protection with copyright protection — National law precluding copyright protection or rendering it unenforceable for a certain period in the case of designs which entered the public domain before the entry into force of the law — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations)
Case C-168/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 January 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano — Italy) — Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (Industrial and commercial property — Directive 98/71/EC — Legal protection of designs — Article 17 — Obligation concerning the cumulation of design protection with copyright protection — National law precluding copyright protection or rendering it unenforceable for a certain period in the case of designs which entered the public domain before the entry into force of the law — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations)
OJ C 80, 12.3.2011, p. 4–4
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.3.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 80/4 |
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 January 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano — Italy) — Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA
(Case C-168/09) (1)
(Industrial and commercial property - Directive 98/71/EC - Legal protection of designs - Article 17 - Obligation concerning the cumulation of design protection with copyright protection - National law precluding copyright protection or rendering it unenforceable for a certain period in the case of designs which entered the public domain before the entry into force of the law - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations)
2011/C 80/05
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Tribunale di Milano
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Flos SpA
Defendant: Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA
Intervener: Assoluce — Associazione nazionale delle Imprese degli Apparecchi di Illuminazione
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale di Milano — Interpretation of Articles 17 and 19 of Directive 98/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 on the legal protection of designs — National legislation implementing the directive by introducing copyright protection for designs — Entitlement of a Member State to extend the conditions for the granting of such protection
Operative part of the judgment
|
1. |
Article 17 of Directive 98/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 on the legal protection of designs must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which excludes from copyright protection in that Member State designs which were protected by a design right registered in or in respect of a Member State and which entered the public domain before the date of entry into force of that legislation, although they meet all the requirements to be eligible for copyright protection. |
|
2. |
Article 17 of Directive 98/71 must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which — either for a substantial period of 10 years or completely — excludes from copyright protection designs which, although they meet all the requirements to be eligible for copyright protection, entered the public domain before the date of entry into force of that legislation, that being the case with regard to any third party who has manufactured or marketed products based on such designs in that State — irrespective of the date on which those acts were performed. |