EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TA0225
Case T-225/14: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2015 — iNET24 Holding v OHIM (IDIRECT24) (Community trade mark — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark IDIRECT24 — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
Case T-225/14: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2015 — iNET24 Holding v OHIM (IDIRECT24) (Community trade mark — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark IDIRECT24 — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
Case T-225/14: Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2015 — iNET24 Holding v OHIM (IDIRECT24) (Community trade mark — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark IDIRECT24 — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
OJ C 346, 19.10.2015, p. 26–27
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
19.10.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 346/26 |
Judgment of the General Court of 3 September 2015 — iNET24 Holding v OHIM (IDIRECT24)
(Case T-225/14) (1)
((Community trade mark - International registration designating the European Community - Word mark IDIRECT24 - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2015/C 346/30)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: iNET24 Holding AG (Feusisberg, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Kirschstein-Freund, B. Breitinger and V. Dalichau, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs) (represented by: initially by A. Pohlmann and S. Hanne, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 February 2014 (Case R 1867/2013-5), concerning the international registration designating the European Community of word mark IDIRECT24.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders iNET24 Holding AG to pay the costs. |