EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012CA0554

Case C-554/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2014  — European Commission v Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI), Hellenic Republic (Appeal — Competition — Article 86(3) EC — Maintenance of preferential rights granted by the Hellenic Republic in favour of a public undertaking for the exploration and exploitation of lignite deposits — Infringement — Decision — Incompatibility with EU law — Subsequent decision — Establishment of specific measures — Solution to the anti-competitive effects of the infringement — Action for annulment)

OJ C 315, 15.9.2014, p. 7–7 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

15.9.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/7


Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2014 — European Commission v Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI), Hellenic Republic

(Case C-554/12 P) (1)

((Appeal - Competition - Article 86(3) EC - Maintenance of preferential rights granted by the Hellenic Republic in favour of a public undertaking for the exploration and exploitation of lignite deposits - Infringement - Decision - Incompatibility with EU law - Subsequent decision - Establishment of specific measures - Solution to the anti-competitive effects of the infringement - Action for annulment))

2014/C 315/09

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: T. Christoforou and A. Antoniadis, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Oikonomou, dikigoros)

Other parties to the proceedings: Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) (represented by: P. Anestis, dikigoros), Hellenic Republic (represented by: P. Mylonopoulos, M.-T. Marinos and K. Boskovits, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in DEI v Commission, T-421/09, EU:T:2012:450;

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

3.

Reserves the costs.


(1)  OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.


Top