EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TA0366
Case T-366/12: Judgment of the General Court of 15 May 2014 — Katjes Fassin v OHIM (Yoghurt-Gums) (Community trade mark — Application for Community figurative mark Yoghurt-Gums — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-366/12: Judgment of the General Court of 15 May 2014 — Katjes Fassin v OHIM (Yoghurt-Gums) (Community trade mark — Application for Community figurative mark Yoghurt-Gums — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-366/12: Judgment of the General Court of 15 May 2014 — Katjes Fassin v OHIM (Yoghurt-Gums) (Community trade mark — Application for Community figurative mark Yoghurt-Gums — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 202, 30.6.2014, p. 21–21
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
30.6.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 202/21 |
Judgment of the General Court of 15 May 2014 — Katjes Fassin v OHIM (Yoghurt-Gums)
(Case T-366/12) (1)
((Community trade mark - Application for Community figurative mark Yoghurt-Gums - Absolute grounds for refusal - Distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2014/C 202/26
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG (Emmerich am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmitz, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 June 2012 (Case R 523/2012-4) concerning registration of the figurative sign Yoghurt-Gums as a Community trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |