EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008CA0289
Case C-289/08: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Directive 96/82/EC — Article 11(1)(c) — External emergency plans — Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)
Case C-289/08: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Directive 96/82/EC — Article 11(1)(c) — External emergency plans — Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)
Case C-289/08: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Directive 96/82/EC — Article 11(1)(c) — External emergency plans — Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)
OJ C 113, 16.5.2009, p. 12–12
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
16.5.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 113/12 |
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
(Case C-289/08) (1)
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 96/82/EC - Article 11(1)(c) - External emergency plans - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)
2009/C 113/23
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Rozet and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: C. Schiltz, acting as Agent)
Re:
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to draw up external emergency plans for the measures to be taken outside establishments subject to Article 9 of Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances (OJ 1997 L 10, p. 13)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Declares that, by failing to draw up within the period prescribed an external emergency plan for the measures to be taken outside establishments subject to Article 9 of Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11(1)(c) of that directive. |
|
2. |
Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |