Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62007TN0436

Case T-436/07 P: Appeal brought on 30 November 2007 by Nikos Giannopoulos against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 20 September 2007 in Case F-111/06, Giannopoulos v Council

OJ C 22, 26.1.2008, p. 50–50 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

26.1.2008   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/50

Appeal brought on 30 November 2007 by Nikos Giannopoulos against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 20 September 2007 in Case F-111/06, Giannopoulos v Council

(Case T-436/07 P)

(2008/C 22/94)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Nikos Giannopoulos (Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium) (represented by S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, Lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought by the appellant

—

declare the present appeal admissible;

—

annul the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 20 September 2007 in Case F-111/06;

—

uphold the claims for annulment and for compensation submitted by the appellant at first instance;

—

order the defendant at first instance to pay all the costs of the proceedings at first instance and on appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his appeal, the appellant puts forward pleas in law alleging failures to state reasons and manifest errors of assessment in the response given by the Civil Service Tribunal in relation to the first plea in law, alleging breach of Article 31(2) of the Staff Regulations, which the appellant put forward in the proceedings at first instance.

Top