EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention)

 

SUMMARY OF:

Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters

Decision (EU) 2022/1206 concerning the accession of the European Union to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters

WHAT IS THE AIM OF THE CONVENTION AND THE DECISION?

  • By providing a minimum standard for the circulation of foreign judgments in civil and commercial matters among the countries that are party to the convention, the convention promotes access to justice for all and facilitates international trade, investment and mobility by reducing the risks and costs of cross-border litigation.
  • It allows European Union (EU) citizens and businesses to have rulings by a court in the EU recognised and enforced in non-EU countries that are also party to the convention.
  • It also ensures that non-EU-country judgments are recognised and enforced in the EU only where fundamental principles of EU law are respected.
  • The decision approves the EU’s accession to the convention.

KEY POINTS

Recognition of judgments in EU law

Prior to this convention, the EU had already adopted a number of instruments concerning the recognition of judgments in civil and commercial matters:

Scope

  • This convention applies to the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil or commercial matters but does not extend, in particular, to revenue, customs or administrative matters.
  • Other excluded matters are listed in Article 2 of the convention.
  • In addition, the EU has excluded by a declaration the application of the convention to non-residential leases (tenancies) of immovable property situated in the EU.

Recognition and enforcement

  • A judgment that falls within the scope of the convention and was given by a court of one party to the convention (state of origin) must be recognised and enforced in another (requested state).
  • The convention provides a minimum standard for the circulation of judgments among the parties to the convention. The convention does not prevent its contracting parties from also recognising and enforcing under national law other judgments that do not fall under the scope of the convention, except in situations defined in Article 6 of the convention.
  • Under the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention, a judgment is recognisable and enforceable in other contracting parties if it was given by a court that was competent in accordance with Article 5 of the convention.
  • A judgment must be recognised only if it has effect in the state of origin, and must be enforced only if it is enforceable in the state of origin.
  • Recognition or enforcement may be refused only on the grounds specified in the convention. These include, for instance, if the judgment:
    • was obtained by fraud; or
    • is inconsistent with a judgment given by a court of the requested state in a dispute between the same parties.
  • The party seeking recognition or applying for enforcement is required to produce certain documents, including a complete and certified copy of the judgment (if the documents are not in the language of the requested state, they must be accompanied by a certified translation).
  • The procedure for recognition, declaration of enforceability or registration for enforcement, and the enforcement of the judgment, are governed by the law of the requested state unless the convention provides otherwise. The court of the requested state cannot refuse the recognition or enforcement of a judgment on the basis that recognition or enforcement should be sought in another state.

DATE OF ENTRY INTO FORCE

The convention entered into force on 1 September 2023.

BACKGROUND

Ireland and Denmark have opt-outs from the area of freedom, security and justice under Protocols Nos 21 and 22 annexed to the EU treaties.

  • Having opted in to Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012, Ireland is bound by this convention.
  • Denmark is not bound by the convention and is not subject to its application.

For further information see:

MAIN DOCUMENTS

Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (OJ L 187, 14.7.2022, pp. 4–15).

Council Decision (EU) 2022/1206 of 12 July 2022 concerning the accession of the European Union to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (OJ L 187, 14.7.2022, pp. 1–3).

RELATED DOCUMENTS

Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast) (OJ L 351, 20.12.2012, pp. 1–32).

Successive amendments to Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 have been incorporated in the original text. This consolidated version is of documentary value only.

Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ L 147, 10.6.2009, pp. 5–43).

See consolidated version.

Council Decision 2009/397/EC of 26 February 2009 on the signing on behalf of the European Community of the Convention on Choice of Court Agreements (OJ L 133, 29.5.2009, pp. 1–13).

Council Decision 2014/887/EU of 4 December 2014 on the approval, on behalf of the European Union, of the Hague Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements (OJ L 353, 10.12.2014, pp. 5–8).

last update 08.09.2023

Top