EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C:2019:328:TOC

Official Journal of the European Union, C 328, 30 September 2019


Display all documents published in this Official Journal
 

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 328

European flag  

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 62
30 September 2019


Contents

page

 

IV   Notices

 

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

 

Court of Justice of the European Union

2019/C 328/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

1


 

V   Announcements

 

COURT PROCEEDINGS

 

Court of Justice of the European Union

2019/C 328/02

Case C-411/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 27 May 2019 — WWF Italia o.n.l.u.s. and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Azienda Nazionale Autonoma Strade SpA (ANAS)

2

2019/C 328/03

Case C-415/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 28 May 2019 — Blumar SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate

3

2019/C 328/04

Case C-416/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 28 May 2019 — Roberto Abate SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate

4

2019/C 328/05

Case C-417/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 28 May 2019 — Commerciale Gicap SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate

4

2019/C 328/06

Case C-419/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 29 May 2019 — Irideos S.p.A. v Poste Italiane S.p.A.

5

2019/C 328/07

Case C-431/19 P: Appeal brought on 5 June 2019 by Inpost Paczkomaty sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court delivered on 19 March 2019 in Joined Cases T-282/16 and T-283/16 Inpost Paczkomaty and Inpost v Commission

6

2019/C 328/08

Case C-432/19 P: Appeal brought on 5 June 2019 by Inpost S.A. against the judgment of the General Court delivered on 19 March 2019 in Joined Cases T-282/16 and T-283/16 Inpost Paczkomaty and Inpost v Commission

7

2019/C 328/09

Case C-434/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 5 June 2019 — Poste Italiane SpA v Riscossione Sicilia SpA — tax-collection agency for the province of Palermo and the other provinces of Sicily

8

2019/C 328/10

Case C-435/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 5 June 2019 — Agenzia delle entrate — Riscossione v Poste Italiane SpA

9

2019/C 328/11

Case C-438/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 11 June 2019 — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Frontline Digital GmbH

10

2019/C 328/12

Case C-443/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco (Spain) lodged on 7 June 2019 — Vodafone España S.A.U. v Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa

11

2019/C 328/13

Case C-448/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha (Spain) lodged on 12 June 2019 — WT v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Guadalajara

12

2019/C 328/14

Case C-452/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción No 6 de Ceuta (Spain) lodged on 12 June 2019 — YV v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.

13

2019/C 328/15

Case C-455/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción de Ceuta (Spain) lodged on 12 June 2019 — BX v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.

14

2019/C 328/16

Case C-469/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 19 June 2019 — All in One Star Ltd

15

2019/C 328/17

Case C-477/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 21 June 2019 — IE v Magistrat der Stadt Wien

15

2019/C 328/18

Case C-482/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 6 de Ceuta (Spain) lodged on 24 June 2019 — JF, KG v Bankia SA

17

2019/C 328/19

Case C-492/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark (Austria) lodged on 26 June 2019 — OK

18

2019/C 328/20

Case C-493/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark (Austria) lodged on 26 June 2019 — PL

19

2019/C 328/21

Case C-494/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark (Austria) lodged on 26 June 2019 — QM

20

2019/C 328/22

Case C-502/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 1 July 2019 — Criminal proceedings against Oriol Junqueras Vies

21

2019/C 328/23

Case C-509/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München (Germany) lodged on 4 July 2019 — BMW Bayerische Motorenwerke AG v Hauptzollamt München

22

2019/C 328/24

Case C-516/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 9 July 2019 — NMI Technologietransfer GmbH v EuroNorm GmbH

22

2019/C 328/25

Case C-520/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě (Czech Republic) lodged on 9 July 2019 — ARMOSTAV MÍSTEK s.r.o. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství

23

2019/C 328/26

Case C-526/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 9 July 2019 — Entoma SAS v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances, Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation

24

2019/C 328/27

Case C-528/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 10 July 2019 — F-AG v Tax Office Y

25

2019/C 328/28

Case C-530/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 11 July 2019 — NM, acting as insolvency administrator in the insolvency proceedings concerning the assets of NIKI Luftfahrt GmbH v ON

25

2019/C 328/29

Case C-535/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 12 July 2019 — A v Latvijas Republikas Veselības ministrija

26

2019/C 328/30

Case C-539/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I (Germany) lodged on 15 July 2019 — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Telefonica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG

27

2019/C 328/31

Case C-543/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 16 July 2019 — Jebsen & Jessen (GmbH & Co.) KG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg

28

2019/C 328/32

Case C-556/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 22 July 2019 — Société Eco TLC v Ministre de la transition écologique et solidaire

28

2019/C 328/33

Case C-562/19 P: Appeal brought on 2 July 2019 by the European Commission against the judgment delivered by the General Court of the European Union (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) on 16 May 2019 in Cases T-836/16 and T-624/17 Republic of Poland v European Commission

29

2019/C 328/34

Case C-570/19: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court (Ireland) made on 26 July 2019 — Irish Ferries Ltd v National Transport Authority

30

2019/C 328/35

Case C-578/19: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom) made on 30 July 2019 — X v Kuoni Travel Ltd

32

2019/C 328/36

Case C-579/19: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom) made on 30 July 2019 — R (on the application of Association of Independent Meat Suppliers and another) v The Food Standards Agency

33

2019/C 328/37

Case C-615/19 P: Appeal brought on 16 August 2019 by John Dalli against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 6 June 2019 in Case T-399/17: Dalli v Commission

34

 

General Court

2019/C 328/38

Case T-406/15: Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2019 — Mahmoudian v Council (Non-contractual liability — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran — Freezing of funds — Restrictions on admission to the territories of the Member States — Compensation for the damage allegedly suffered as a result of the inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures — Material damage — Non-material damage)

36

2019/C 328/39

Case T-522/15: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — CCPL and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Retail food packaging market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Attributability of unlawful conduct — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Ceiling of the fine — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Ability to pay)

37

2019/C 328/40

Case T-8/16: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology and Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for optical disk drives — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Collusive agreements relating to procurement events organised by two computer manufacturers — Breach of essential procedural requirements and of the rights of the defence — Jurisdiction of the Commission — Geographic scope of the infringement — Single and continuous infringement — Principle of good administration — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines)

38

2019/C 328/41

Joined Case T-244/16 and T-285/17: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Yanukovych v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

38

2019/C 328/42

Case T-805/16: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — IPPT PAN v Commission and REA (Arbitration clause — Sixth and Seventh Framework Programmes for research, technological development and demonstration activities — Decision to recover by offsetting claims of the European Union arising from the performance of a contract — Effective judicial protection — Right to refer to the Ombudsman — Financial regulation — Debts which are certain — Legitimate expectations — Principle of non-discrimination — Principle of sound administration — Misuse of powers — Contractual liability — Audit report — Eligible costs)

39

2019/C 328/43

Case T-894/16: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Air France v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Measures implemented by France in favour of Marseille Provence Airport and airlines using the airport — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Investment subsidies — Differentiation between airport charges applicable to national and international flights — Reduced airport charges to encourage flights from the new Marseille Provence terminal 2 — Lack of individual concern — No substantial effect on the competitive position — Inadmissibility)

40

2019/C 328/44

Case T-291/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Transdev and Others v Commission (State aid — State aid scheme implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 — Investment subsidies granted by the Île-de-France Region — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market — Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ — Article 107 TFEU — Article 108 TFEU — Article 1(b)(i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Limitation period — Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589 — Obligation to state reasons)

41

2019/C 328/45

Case T-292/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Île-de-France Region v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 — Investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France Region — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market — Advantage — Selective nature — Article 107(1) TFEU — Obligation to state reasons — Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ — Article 108 TFEU — Article 1, (b) (i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589)

42

2019/C 328/46

Case T-309/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Optile v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 — Investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France region — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market — Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ — Article 107 TFEU — Article 108 TFEU — Article 1, (b) (i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Limitation period — Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589)

43

2019/C 328/47

Case T-330/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Ceobus and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 — Investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France region — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market — Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ — Article 107 TFEU — Article 108 TFEU — Article 1, (b) (i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Limitation period — Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589)

43

2019/C 328/48

Case T-331/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Steifer v EESC (Civil service — Officials — Pensions — Pension entitlement acquired before entry into service of the EU — Transfer to the EU scheme — Grant of additional seniority — Reimbursement of the amount of pension entitlement not taken into account in the scheme for the calculation of annuities of pension of the EU — No new and substantial facts — No excusable error — Liability — Inadmissibility)

44

2019/C 328/49

Case T-738/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — STIF-IDF v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 — Investment subsidies awarded by the STIF-IDF — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market — Advantage — Offsetting of costs involved in the discharging of public service obligations — Article 107(1), TFEU — Obligation to state reasons)

45

2019/C 328/50

Case T-53/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — Germany v Commission (Approximation of laws — Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 — Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 — Construction products — Harmonised standards EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 and EN 12285-2:2005 — Obligation to state reasons)

46

2019/C 328/51

Case T-95/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Gollnisch v Parliament (Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Complaint — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Error of fact)

46

2019/C 328/52

Case T-274/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Klymenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

47

2019/C 328/53

Case T-285/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Pshonka v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted with regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation on the Council to check that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in observance of the rights of the defence and of the right to effective judicial protection)

48

2019/C 328/54

Case T-289/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Pshonka v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted with regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation on the Council to check that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in observance of the rights of the defence and of the right to effective judicial protection)

49

2019/C 328/55

Case T-349/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Hauzenberger v EUIPO (TurboPerformance) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark TurboPerformance — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

50

2019/C 328/56

Case T-397/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — Hugo’s Hotel v EUIPO — H'ugo's (HUGO’S BURGER Bar) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark HUGO’S BURGER Bar — Earlier EU word mark H’ugo’s — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

50

2019/C 328/57

Case T-482/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — XF v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Installation allowance — Temporary change of place of employment — Change of residence)

51

2019/C 328/58

Case T-480/16: Order of the General Court of 8 July 2019 — Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO — Amedei (For you) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark For you — Decision to reject the application for registration based on absolute grounds for refusal — No longer any locus standi — No need to adjudicate)

52

2019/C 328/59

Case T-158/18: Order of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — Scaloni and Figini v Commission (Action for damages — Resolution of credit institutions and investment firms — Directive 2014/59/EU and Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 — State Aid — Disregard of the procedural requirements — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)

52

2019/C 328/60

Case T-544/18: Order of the General Court of (Ninth Chamber) of 5 July 2019 — ArcelorMittal Bremen v Commission (Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Regulation (EU) No 389/2013 — Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances — Notification of a change in the national allocation table for Germany for the period from 2013 to 2020 — Request to change the national allocation table recorded in the European Union Transaction Log — Action for failure to act — Instruction given during the proceedings by the Commission to the central administration — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

53

2019/C 328/61

Case T-660/18: Order of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — VodafoneZiggo Group v Commission (Action for annulment — Electronic communications — Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC — Wholesale provision of fixed access — Joint significant market power — Specific regulatory obligations imposed on operators — Draft measure made accessible by the national regulatory authority — Comments of the Commission — Second phase of the procedure not opened — Act not open to challenge — Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure — Inadmissibility)

54

2019/C 328/62

Case T-662/18: Order of the General Court of 4 July 2019 — romwell v EUIPO (twistpac) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark twistpac — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty of care — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

55

2019/C 328/63

Case T-674/18: Order of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Vattenfall Europe Nuclear Energy v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — 16th Law amending the Law on Nuclear Energy (Atomgesetz) — Implementation of a judgment of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (German Federal Constitutional Court) — Companies operating nuclear power stations — Cessation of operation — Financial compensation for the amounts of electricity not generated — Letter from the Commission — No requirement for formal notification under Article 108(3) TFEU — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)

55

2019/C 328/64

Case T-687/18: Order of the General Court of 10 July 2019 — Pilatus Bank v ECB (Action for annulment — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Suspension measures taken by the national supervisory authority — Appointment of a contact person — Limited communication with the ECB — Procedural defects — Intermediary or preparatory measures — Rights of defence — Inadmissibility)

56

2019/C 328/65

Case T-176/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 15 July 2019 — 3V Sigma v ECHA (Application for interim measures — REACH — UVASORB HEB — Evaluation procedure — Decision of the Board of Appeal of ECHA — Application for interim measures — No urgency)

57

2019/C 328/66

Case T-280/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Highgate Capital Management v Commission (Interim relief — State aid — Application for interim measures — No need to adopt the interim measures requested — Lack of jurisdiction — Inadmissibility)

58

2019/C 328/67

Case T-355/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — CE v Committee of the Regions (Interim relief — Civil service — Application for interim measures — Lack of urgency)

58

2019/C 328/68

Case T-367/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 15 July 2019 — Camerin v Commission (Interim measures — Civil Service — Application for interim measures — No urgency)

59

2019/C 328/69

Case T-480/19: Action brought on 8 July 2019 — Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB

59

2019/C 328/70

Case T-510/19: Action brought on 17 July 2019 — Puma v EUIPO — Gemma Group (Device of a jumping animal)

61

2019/C 328/71

Case T-517/19: Action brought on 19 July 2019 — Homoki v Commission

62

2019/C 328/72

Case T-525/19: Action brought on 25 July 2019 — Intering and Others v Commission

64

2019/C 328/73

Case T-537/19: Action brought on 30 July 2019 — DK v GSA

65

2019/C 328/74

Case T-538/19: Action brought on 30 July 2019 — Casino, Guichard-Perrachon v Commission

66

2019/C 328/75

Case T-539/19: Action brought on 30 July 2019 — Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises v Commission

67

2019/C 328/76

Case T-552/19: Action brought on 7 August 2019 — Malacalza Investimenti v ECB

68

2019/C 328/77

Case T-555/19: Action brought on 9 August 2019 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Fontana Food (GRILLOUMI)

70

2019/C 328/78

Case T-556/19: Action brought on 9 August 2019 — Republic of Cyprus v EUIPO — Fontana Food (GRILLOUMI)

71

2019/C 328/79

Case T-557/19: Action brought on 9 August 2019 — Seven v EUIPO (7Seven)

72

2019/C 328/80

Case T-559/19: Action brought on 12 August 2019 — Julius Sämann v EUIPO — Maharishi Vedic University (Representation of a tree)

72

2019/C 328/81

Case T-561/19: Action brought on 13 August 2019 — Lípidos Santiga v Commission

73

2019/C 328/82

Case T-570/19: Action brought on 16 August 2019 — Muratbey Gida v EUIPO (Shape of a braided cheese)

74

2019/C 328/83

Case T-571/19: Action brought on 16 August 2019 — Muratbey Gida v EUIPO (Shape of a braided cheese)

75

2019/C 328/84

Case T-572/19: Action brought on 16 August 2019 — Muratbey Gida v EUIPO (Shape of a braided cheese)

75

2019/C 328/85

Case T-577/19: Action brought on 19 August 2019 — Leinfelder Uhren München v EUIPO — Schafft (Leinfelder)

76

2019/C 328/86

Case T-305/17: Order of the General Court of 3 July 2019 — Red Bull v EUIPO (Representation of a parallelogram composed of two fields in different colours)

77

2019/C 328/87

Case T-227/18: Order of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Microsemi Europe and Microsemi v Commission

77


EN

 

Top