EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CN0239
Case C-239/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 5 April 2022 — État belge and Promo 54 v Promo 54 and État belge
Case C-239/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 5 April 2022 — État belge and Promo 54 v Promo 54 and État belge
Case C-239/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 5 April 2022 — État belge and Promo 54 v Promo 54 and État belge
OJ C 257, 4.7.2022, p. 26–26
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 257, 4.7.2022, p. 22–22
(GA)
4.7.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 257/26 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 5 April 2022 — État belge and Promo 54 v Promo 54 and État belge
(Case C-239/22)
(2022/C 257/33)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Cour de cassation
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellants: État belge, Promo 54
Respondents: Promo 54, État belge
Question referred
Must Article 12(1) and (2) and Article 135(1)(j) of Directive 2006/112/EC (1) be interpreted as meaning that, where the Member State has not defined the detailed rules for the application of the criterion of first occupation to converted immovable property, the supply, after conversion, of a building in respect of which, before conversion, there had been first occupation within the meaning of Article 12(1)(a) or the third subparagraph of Article 12(2) of the directive remains exempt from value added tax?
(1) Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).