EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62002CJ0074
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 September 2003. # Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany. # Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 1999/94/EC - Failure to implement within the prescribed period. # Case C-74/02.
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 September 2003.
Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 1999/94/EC - Failure to implement within the prescribed period.
Case C-74/02.
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 September 2003.
Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany.
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 1999/94/EC - Failure to implement within the prescribed period.
Case C-74/02.
European Court Reports 2003 I-09877
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:500
«(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 1999/94/EC – Failure to implement within the prescribed period)»
|
||||
(Art. 226 EC)
(Art. 226 EC)
(Art. 226 EC)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber)
25 September 2003 (1)
((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 1999/94/EC – Failure to implement within the prescribed period))
In Case C-74/02, Commission of the European Communities, represented by G. zur Hausen, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg,applicant,
v
Federal Republic of Germany, represented by W.-D. Plessing and M. Lumma, acting as Agents,defendant,
APPLICATION for a declaration that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the measures necessary to comply with Directive 1999/94/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 relating to the availability of consumer information on fuel economy and CO 2 emissions in respect of the marketing of new passenger cars (OJ 2000 L 12, p. 16), the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive,THE COURT (First Chamber),,
having regard to the report of the Judge-Rapporteur,
having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (First Chamber)
hereby:
Wathelet |
Jann |
Rosas |
R. Grass |
M. Wathelet |
Registrar |
President of the First Chamber |