EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0312
Case T-312/20: Action brought on 27 May 2020 — EVH v Commission
Case T-312/20: Action brought on 27 May 2020 — EVH v Commission
Case T-312/20: Action brought on 27 May 2020 — EVH v Commission
OJ C 247, 27.7.2020, p. 35–36
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
27.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 247/35 |
Action brought on 27 May 2020 — EVH v Commission
(Case T-312/20)
(2020/C 247/47)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: EVH GmbH (Halle [Saale], Germany) (represented by: I. Zenke and T. Heymann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the defendant’s decision of 26 February 2019 declaring the merger of ‘RWE/E.ON Assets’ to be compatible with the internal market (Case M.8871) (OJ 2020 C 111, S. 1); |
— |
order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging that the approval decision is formally flawed
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant insufficiently assessed the facts and should have undertaken a Phase II-procedure in the context of an appropriate assessment.
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant made a manifest error of assessment of the merger as being compatible with competition, partly as a result of its inadequate investigation
|