Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62020TN0289

Case T-289/20: Action brought on 15 May 2020 — Facegym v EUIPO (FACEGYM)

OJ C 247, 27.7.2020, p. 26–27 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

27.7.2020   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/26

Action brought on 15 May 2020 — Facegym v EUIPO (FACEGYM)

(Case T-289/20)

(2020/C 247/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Facegym Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark FACEGYM — Application for registration No. W1 466 456

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 February 2020 in Case R 70/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

alternatively

—

alter the contested decision so that it is now held that the allegedly offending goods and services of the International Trade Mark Registration do not offend against Article 7(1)(b) or (c);

—

order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this application and the costs below.

Plea in law

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) or (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Top