Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62016TN0419

Case T-419/16: Action brought on 28 July 2016 — Carrera Brands v EUIPO — Autec (Carrera)

OJ C 343, 19.9.2016, p. 44–45 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

19.9.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/44

Action brought on 28 July 2016 — Carrera Brands v EUIPO — Autec (Carrera)

(Case T-419/16)

(2016/C 343/59)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Carrera Brands Ltd (Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China) (represented by: C. Markowsky, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Autec AG (Nuremberg, Germany)

Details of the procedure before EUIPO

Proprietor of the mark at issue: the applicant

Mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Carrera’ — EU trade mark No 4 630 711

Proceedings before EUIPO: revocation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2016 in Case R 278/2015-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul paragraph 2 of the operative part of the contested decision and amend it to the extent that the decision of the Cancellation Division of 21 January 2015 is annulled;

—

annul the contested decision with regard to the rejection of the applicant’s request for the proceedings to be stayed; and

—

in the alternative: amend the contested decision in such a way that the applicant’s request of 22 August 2014 for the proceedings to be stayed, repeated on 21 May 2015 in the appeal proceedings, is granted;

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 56(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;

—

Infringement of Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation No 2868/95.
Top