EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62006TA0221

Case T-221/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Hipp & Co v OHIM — Laboratoris Ordesa (Bebimil) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for Community word mark Bebimil — Earlier Community and national word marks BLEMIL — Earlier national word mark BLEMIL 1 — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Likelihood of confusion)

OJ C 267, 7.11.2009, p. 54–54 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

7.11.2009   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/54


Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 September 2009 — Hipp & Co v OHIM — Laboratoris Ordesa (Bebimil)

(Case T-221/06) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community word mark Bebimil - Earlier Community and national word marks BLEMIL - Earlier national word mark BLEMIL 1 - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Likelihood of confusion)

2009/C 267/92

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Hipp & Co KG (Sachseln, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey and A. Bognár, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Latinien and A. Folliard-Mongiural, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: Laboratoris Ordesa, SL (Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: R. Thierie and E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 June 2006 (Case R 571/2005-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Laboratorios Ordesa, SL and Hipp & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

orders Hipp & Co. KG to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 237, 30.9.2006.


Top