EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022CB0754

Case C-754/22 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 January 2024 — OG, OH, OI, OJ v European Commission (Appeal — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2288 and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/503 — Regulation (EU) 2021/953 — EU Digital COVID Certificate — Freedom of movement of persons — Restrictions — Action for annulment — Inadmissibility — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Appeal manifestly unfounded)

OJ C, C/2024/2402, 8.4.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2402/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2402/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series


C/2024/2402

8.4.2024

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 January 2024 — OG, OH, OI, OJ v European Commission

(Case C-754/22 P) (1)

(Appeal - Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2288 and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/503 - Regulation (EU) 2021/953 - EU Digital COVID Certificate - Freedom of movement of persons - Restrictions - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

(C/2024/2402)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellants: OG, OH, OI, OJ (represented by: D. Gómez Fernández, abogado)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and E. Montaguti, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1.

The appeal is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

2.

OG, OH, OI and OJ shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.


(1)   OJ C 94, 13.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2402/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)


Top