http://www.europarl.europa.eu/QP-WEB
WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITH ANSWER

Written questions by Members of the European Parliament and their answers given by a European Union institution

(2014/C 416/01)

Contents

E-000756/14 by Rachida Dati to the Commission

Subject: VP/HR — The EU must be committed to fighting against the persecution of Christians around the world

P-002370/14 by Hans-Peter Martin to the Commission

Subject: VP/HR — Average salary of European External Action Service staff

E-002538/14 by Diane Dodds to the Commission

Subject: Rising religious persecution

E-003049/14 by Oreste Rossi and Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: VP/HR — Visit by EU High Representative to Iran — First visit by European foreign policy chief since 2008 — Talks doomed to failure

E-003089/14 by Carlo Fidanza, Marco Scurria and Magdi Cristiano Allam to the Commission

Subject: VP/HR — Protecting the Italian-speaking community in Crimea

E-003233/14 by David Casa to the Commission

Subject: VP/HR — Ukrainian Snipers

E-003285/14 by Elena Băsescu to the Commission

Subject: EU accession prospects for Eastern European partners

E-003456/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Instability in Eastern Europe and the risks for the Baltic States

E-003475/14 by Charles Tannock to the Commission

Subject: Application of EU privacy law with regard to criminals

E-003545/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris and Oreste Rossi to the Commission

Subject: EU cooperation with third countries in CSDP missions

P-003562/14 by Corina Creţu to the Commission

Subject: VP/HR — European Union response in view of the situation in Transnistria

E-003572/14 by Franck Proust to the Council

Subject: Common defence

E-003628/14 by Antigoni Papadopoulou to the Commission

Subject: The Memoranda and current urgent needs

E-003810/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris and Oreste Rossi to the Commission

Subject: US deliveries of nonlethal aid to Syrian rebels

E-003835/14 by Marc Tarabella to the Commission

Subject: Blue growth

E-003875/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Development and more widespread use of underwater drones

E-003960/14 by Nikolaos Chountis to the Commission

Subject: Control of Greek customs operations

E-003995/14 by Cristiana Muscardini to the Commission

Subject: 2013 — annus horribilis for human rights in China

E-004096/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris and Oreste Rossi to the Commission

Subject: VP/HR — The paltry diplomatic role being played by the EU in finding a diplomatic resolution to the crisis in Ukraine

E-004101/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris and Oreste Rossi to the Commission

Subject: VP/HR — Fresh demonstrations in Ukraine, and risk of the country breaking up

E-004167/14 by Cristiana Muscardini to the Commission

Subject: Violence against migrants in Spain

E-004223/14 by Claudette Abela Baldacchino to the Commission

Subject: Child soldiers

E-004268/14 by Isabelle Durant to the Commission

Subject: VP/HR — Memorandum of understanding between EU and Israel

E-004395/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris and Oreste Rossi to the Commission

Subject: Unilateral declaration of independence in the Donetsk region

E-004398/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris and Oreste Rossi to the Commission

Subject: Death of a European citizen in Homs

E-004454/14 by Elena Băsescu to the Commission

Subject: Ukraine support group

E-004500/14 by Diane Dodds to the Commission

Subject: Law enforcement

E-004503/14 by Diane Dodds to the Commission

Subject: Interreg funding

E-004515/14 by Nikolaos Chountis to the Commission

Subject: Contract for the sale of Hellinikon SA through the HRADF

P-004581/14 by Silvia-Adriana Ţicău to the Commission

Subject: Invalidity of Directive 2006/24/EC on the retention of data

E-004614/14 by Elena Băsescu to the Commission

Subject: Counterfeit medicines

E-004647/14 by Roberta Metsola to the Commission

Subject: Ozone concentration levels

E-004684/14 by Marlene Mizzi to the Commission

Subject: Smarter visa policy

E-004701/14 by Roberta Metsola to the Commission

Subject: Cybercrime and children

E-004702/14 by Roberta Metsola to the Commission

Subject: Domain names

E-004707/14 by Roberta Metsola to the Commission

Subject: EU funding for local councils

E-004784/14 by Gilles Pargneaux to the Commission

Subject: Legislative framework for improving waste management in the EU

E-004731/14 by Roberta Metsola to the Commission

Subject: Recycling targets

E-004776/14 by Erik Bánki, Csaba Sógor, Petru Constantin Luhan, Teresa Riera Madurell, Oreste Rossi, Carl Schlyter, Nikos Chrysogelos, Michèle Rivasi, Monika Panayotova and Kathleen Van Brempt to the Commission

Subject: Inflammatory bowel disease

E-004823/14 by Judith Sargentini, Jean Lambert and Karima Delli to the Commission

Subject: Tackling modern slavery in the South Indian textile and garment industry

E-004824/14 by Ana Gomes to the Commission

Subject: VP/HR — Cases of Bakhytzhan Kashkumbayev and Aron Atabek in Kazakhstan

E-004827/14 by Roberta Metsola to the Commission

Subject: Fiscal Compact implementation

E-004882/14 by Marlene Mizzi to the Commission

Subject: Budapest Memorandum of 1994

E-004970/14 by Roberta Metsola to the Council

Subject: Food safety in agricultural products

E-004996/14 by Roberta Metsola to the Commission

Subject: Food safety in agricultural products

E-005032/14 by Monica Luisa Macovei to the Commission

Subject: Discrimination of women in Iraq

E-005033/14 by Monica Luisa Macovei to the Commission

Subject: Child marriage in Malawi

E-005034/14 by Monica Luisa Macovei to the Commission

Subject: Freedom of speech in Jordan

E-005035/14 by Monica Luisa Macovei to the Commission

Subject: Human rights issues in Sri Lanka

E-005037/14 by Monica Luisa Macovei to the Commission

Subject: Human rights violations by the Ethiopian police

E-005038/14 by Monica Luisa Macovei to the Commission

Subject: Illegal use of force against Yemeni protesters

E-005066/14 by Marc Tarabella to the Commission

Subject: Travel websites and redress

E-005109/14 by Roberta Metsola to the Council

Subject: People with disabilities — employment in EU institutions

E-005110/14 by Roberta Metsola to the Council

Subject: People with disabilities — employment in EU institutions

E-005161/14 by Béla Kovács to the Commission

Subject: A welcome for carcinogenic soot, to take the place of carbon dioxide

E-005216/14 by Theodoros Skylakakis to the Commission

Subject: Amendment on the granting of loans to Greek political parties

E-005234/14 by Charles Tannock to the Council

Subject: Blood minerals in North Korea

P-005254/14 by Eva Lichtenberger to the Commission

Subject: Decision of the Court of Justice on the Data Retention Directive/Article 15 of the directive on privacy and electronic communications

E-005284/14 by Claudette Abela Baldacchino to the Commission

Subject: Gender and SMEs

E-005285/14 by Claudette Abela Baldacchino to the Commission

Subject: Household WEEE targets

E-005304/14 by Gilles Pargneaux to the Commission

Subject: European action plan against the planned obsolescence of products

E-005324/14 by Emer Costello to the Commission

Subject: Natural catastrophe insurance markets and homes at risk of flooding and storm damage

E-005355/14 by Vasilica Viorica Dăncilă to the Commission

Subject: Online gaming

E-005357/14 by Roberta Metsola to the Council

Subject: Trafficking in human beings

P-005377/14 by Franziska Keller to the Commission

Subject: Post Court of Justice data retention decision: entry/exit system

E-005380/14 by Hiltrud Breyer to the Commission

Subject: Continued operation of largest toxic landfill site in Europe despite failure to carry out an environmental impact assessment

E-005397/14 by Diane Dodds to the Commission

Subject: Recent protests in Donetsk

E-005398/14 by Kinga Gál to the Commission

Subject: Disregard for a child's rights in legal proceedings

E-005423/14 by Antigoni Papadopoulou to the Commission

Subject: Better terms for the funding of small and medium-sized enterprises

E-005427/14 by Antigoni Papadopoulou to the Commission

Subject: Question for written answer No E-014065/2013

E-005437/14 by Sonia Alfano to the Commission

Subject: Nationalities represented in the Commission

E-005484/14 by Marlene Mizzi to the Commission

Subject: People with disabilities

E-005491/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Next Generation Identification Project

E-005492/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Regeneration of green spaces in urban areas

E-005493/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Sharka, the new pome fruit virus

E-005494/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: VP/HR — Incidents on the Temple Mount

E-005495/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Railway accident in India

E-005497/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: VP/HR — Nigeria — over 100 female students abducted

E-005498/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Pilot project for the replenishment of aquifers

E-005499/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Medical appointments via Skype for patients with motor difficulties

E-005500/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Disposal of WEEE

E-005501/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Seagrass biomass

E-005516/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Tackling coastal erosion

E-005502/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Sexual health and awareness

E-005503/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Genetic decoding to reverse the development of cancer cells

E-005504/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Low profile of liver diseases

E-005505/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Medicines and side effects on the liver

E-005506/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Spa Treatments: excellence in the service of health

E-005507/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Growth in the number of adolescents who self-harm

E-005508/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Enhancing the skills of LAGs

E-005509/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: ‘Alternative’ approaches to disease prevention

E-005510/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Some strategies for the treatment of eating disorders

E-005511/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Saturated fat and the link with breast cancer

E-005512/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Gut microbiota and related diseases

E-005513/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Lifesaving bracelet

E-005514/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Small Italian business is a model of integration

E-005515/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Environmental regeneration through hemp

E-005517/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Rare diseases and children

E-005518/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Protective bacteria which are beneficial to young babies

E-005519/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Charcoal; an alternative to wood

E-005520/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Lessons in entrepreneurship

E-005521/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Database of organ donors

E-005522/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Upgrading marina berths and attracting tourists

E-005523/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris and Oreste Rossi to the Commission

Subject: Creation of a special criminal court to hear charges against the UÇK

E-005524/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris and Oreste Rossi to the Commission

Subject: Risks associated with the use of antibacterial soaps

E-005525/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Pollutant-capturing biodynamic cement

E-005526/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Low-fat diets for treating asthma

E-005527/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Integration of movements between land and sea

E-005528/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Active citizenship ‘app’

E-005529/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Development of 3D printers and risks to intellectual property rights

E-005530/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Pollution caused by use of the Internet

E-005531/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Shortcomings of a Chinese project for shielding several city centres from smog

E-005532/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Strategies for reusing waste material

E-005533/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Recycling of water

E-005534/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Project for a new tool to monitor incitement of hatred in European political debate

E-005535/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Structural funding for companies operating in the defence sector

E-005536/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Spread of car sharing

E-005537/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Chinese-Italian space geodesy project and European space cooperation

E-005538/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Marine waste: pollutants on our tables

E-005539/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: New tools for diagnosing tumours

E-005540/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Safe cosmetics

E-005541/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Food for health

E-005542/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Organic compound for transfusions

E-005543/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Developments in the field of haemostatics

E-005544/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Non-invasive chemotherapy drug

E-005545/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Effectiveness of new luminous devices for pedestrian crossings

E-005546/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Risks associated with the spread of the Louisiana red swamp crayfish in the Adriatic

E-005547/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Depression in the workplace

E-005548/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Terrorist activities targeting the anti-polio campaign

E-005549/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Contaminated area in Brescia

E-005550/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Restoration of a ship in order to promote inclusiveness

E-005551/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Monitoring the consumption of cruise ships

E-005552/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Nuclear waste observatory

E-005553/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Alarming trends in child and adolescent abuse

E-005554/14 by Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris to the Commission

Subject: Tensions arising from the construction of a gas pipeline on the border between China and Burma

(Version française)

Question avec demande de réponse écrite E-000756/14

à la Commission (Vice-présidente/Haute Représentante)

Rachida Dati (PPE)

(27 janvier 2014)

Objet: VP/HR — L'UE doit s'engager pour lutter contre la persécution des chrétiens dans le monde

Selon l'index mondial de la persécution établi par l'ONG Portes Ouvertes, plus de 150 millions de chrétiens seraient actuellement persécutés dans le monde. On observe d'ailleurs une tendance à la hausse ces dernières années.

Au regard des informations fournies par l'association Aide à l'Église en Détresse (ADE) et par Portes ouvertes, il apparaît que les chrétiens subiraient 75 % des cas de persécution religieuse dans le monde.

En 2013, ce ne sont pas moins de 2123 chrétiens qui ont été tués du fait de leur religion, dont plus de la moitié en Syrie.

Il est en effet constaté que la situation devient particulièrement dramatique dans certains pays ayant connu les soulèvements du printemps arabe. Les conflits et les transitions politiques difficiles rendent les minorités chrétiennes plus vulnérables. C'est notamment le cas en Syrie, où l'instabilité politique a mis fin à la protection dont bénéficiait cette minorité auparavant, mais également en Égypte.

En effet, toujours selon l'ONG Portes Ouvertes, la Syrie afficherait cette année le plus grand nombre de chrétiens assassinés avec 1 213 assassinats avérés, devant le Nigeria. L'Égypte, quant à elle, serait le premier pays en terme de violences infligées aux chrétiens en 2013. On dénombre 167 actes violents de persécutions avérés et plus de 492 tentatives de fermetures d'églises ou bâtiments annexes.

En outre, les persécutions ne se limitent pas à des violences physiques mais incluent également des pressions, des interdictions, des discriminations liées à leur religion.

Aussi, quelles démarches la haute représentante pour les affaires étrangères compte-t-elle entreprendre pour condamner ces violences et ces violations flagrantes de la liberté de religion et du respect des Droits de l'homme, et s'assurer ainsi de la protection des chrétiens dans ces régions?

Réponse donnée par Mme Ashton, Vice-présidente/Haute Représentante au nom de la Commission

(17 juillet 2014)

Depuis quelques années, l'Union européenne consacre de plus en plus d'attention au droit à la liberté de religion ou de conviction. Dans ses conclusions de février 2011 sur l'intolérance, la discrimination et la violence fondées sur la religion ou la conviction, qui faisaient directement suite aux conclusions de novembre 2009 sur la liberté de religion ou de conviction, le Conseil a réaffirmé que l'Union européenne était résolument attachée à la promotion et à la protection de la liberté de religion ou de conviction sans discrimination aucune et a exprimé son inquiétude face au nombre croissant d'actes d'intolérance religieuse et de violence, en particulier envers les chrétiens et leurs lieux de culte.

Par l'adoption, en juin 2013, de lignes directrices sur la liberté de religion ou de conviction, l'UE a réaffirmé que la liberté de religion ou de conviction était une des priorités de sa politique extérieure en matière de Droits de l'homme et a conforté son attachement à défendre cette liberté universelle menacée. Les lignes directrices donnent notamment aux fonctionnaires de l'UE des conseils pratiques sur la manière d'empêcher les violations de la liberté de religion ou de conviction, d'analyser les cas concrets et de réagir de manière efficace aux violations quel que soit l'endroit où elles sont commises.

De nombreuses déclarations et appels ont été émis pour rappeler aux États leur devoir primordial de protéger tous les individus, en particulier les personnes appartenant à des minorités — y compris les chrétiens — contre les discriminations, la violence et les autres violations des Droits de l'homme. La liberté de religion ou de conviction est abordée en profondeur au cours des dialogues sur les Droits de l'homme avec les pays tiers et à toute occasion lorsque cela est considéré comme nécessaire, au niveau bilatéral ou multilatéral. Des projets spécifiques relatifs à la liberté de religion ou de conviction sont également soutenus, en particulier au moyen de l'instrument européen pour la démocratie et les Droits de l'homme.

L'UE va continuer de défendre le droit pour toutes les personnes appartenant à des communautés et à des minorités religieuses de pratiquer leur religion et leur culte librement, individuellement ou en communauté, sans craindre d'être la cible de manifestations d'intolérance ou d'attaques.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-000756/14

to the Commission (Vice-President/High Representative)

Rachida Dati (PPE)

(27 January 2014)

Subject: VP/HR — The EU must be committed to fighting against the persecution of Christians around the world

According to the global index of persecution published by the NGO Portes Ouvertes, more than 150 million Christians are currently being persecuted around the world. What is more, an upward trend has been observed in recent years.

In view of the information provided by the association Aide à l’Église en Détresse (ADE) and by Portes Ouvertes, it seems that 75% of victims of religious persecution around the world are Christians.

In 2013, no fewer than 2 123 Christians were killed because of their religion, with more than half of these murders being committed in Syria.

Indeed, it has been observed that the situation has become particularly serious in certain countries that have witnessed uprisings during the Arab Spring. Conflicts and difficult political transitions make Christian minorities more vulnerable. This is particularly the case in Syria, where political instability has put an end to the protection from which this minority benefited in the past, but this is also happening in Egypt.

Indeed, the NGO Portes Ouvertes also claims that Syria had the highest number of Christians murdered this year, with 1 213 confirmed murders, followed by Nigeria. Egypt, for its part, is reported to be in the top spot in terms of violence inflicted on Christians in 2013. 167 violent acts of persecution have been reported, with more than 492 attempts to close churches or annex buildings.

Furthermore, persecutions are not limited to physical violence, but also include pressure, bans and discrimination on the basis of religion.

In light of this, what steps does the High Representative intend to take in order to condemn these acts of violence and flagrant violations of the freedom of religion and the respect of human rights, and therefore ensure that Christians are protected in these regions?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(17 July 2014)

Over the last years, the EU has been increasingly focusing on the right to freedom of religion or belief (FoRB). In February 2011 Conclusions on intolerance, discrimination and violence on the basis of religion or belief, which were a direct follow up of November 2009 Conclusions on FoRB, the Council reaffirmed the strong commitment of the EU to the promotion and protection of FoRB without any discrimination and expressed its concern about the increasing number of acts of religious intolerance and violence, notably against Christians and their places of worship.

With the adoption of guidelines on freedom of religion or belief in June 2013, the EU reiterated that FoRB was one of its priorities in its external Human rights policy and enhanced its dedication to defend this challenged universal freedom. The guidelines notably provide EU officials with practical guidance on how to seek to prevent violations of FoRB, to analyse cases, and to react effectively to violations wherever they occur.

Numerous statements and calls have been made to remind states of their primary duty to protect everyone, not least persons belonging to minorities — including Christians — from discrimination, violence and other human rights violations. FoRB is addressed in depth during human rights dialogues with third countries and at every opportunity when deemed necessary, at bilateral or multilateral level. Specific FoRB projects are also supported, notably through the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights.

The EU will carry on defending the right for all persons belonging to religious communities and minorities to practice their religion and worship freely, individually or in community with others, without fear of intolerance and attacks.

(Deutsche Fassung)

Anfrage zur schriftlichen Beantwortung P-002370/14

an die Kommission (Vizepräsidentin/Hohe Vertreterin)

Hans-Peter Martin (NI)

(3. März 2014)

Betrifft: VP/HR — Durchschnittsgehalt der Bediensteten des Europäischen Auswärtigen Dienstes (EAD)

Wie hoch war das Durchschnittsgehalt der Bediensteten des EAD in den Jahren 2011, 2012 und 2013 für

Antwort von Frau Ashton — Hohe Vertreterin/Vizepräsidentin im Namen der Kommission

(17. Juli 2014)

Der EAD beschäftigt seine Mitarbeiter in den verschiedenen Laufbahn- und Besoldungsgruppen gemäß dem Statut der Beamten und den Beschäftigungsbedingungen für die sonstigen Bediensteten. Ihre Bezüge und Vergütungen richten sich nach den darin festgelegten Bestimmungen, die vom Rat und vom Europäischen Parlament angenommen wurden, insbesondere nach Artikel 66 und den Anhängen VII und X des Statuts.

(English version)

Question for written answer P-002370/14

to the Commission (Vice-President/High Representative)

Hans-Peter Martin (NI)

(3 March 2014)

Subject: VP/HR — Average salary of European External Action Service staff

What were the average salaries in the European External Action Service (EEAS) in the years 2011, 2012 and 2013 for:

1.EEAS staff in the EU;

2.EEAS staff outside the EU?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(17 July 2014)

The EEAS employs staff in the different categories and grades covered by the staff regulations and the conditions of employment of other servants. Their remuneration and allowances follow the provisions of the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union approved by the Council and the European Parliament, in particular Article 66 and Annexes VII and X of the Staff Regulations.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-002538/14

to the Commission

Diane Dodds (NI)

(5 March 2014)

Subject: Rising religious persecution

Open Doors International, a charity that supports Christians facing persecution for their faith, has said that 2 123 Christians were reported to have been killed during the 12 months ending 31 October 2013, almost twice the equivalent figure of 1 201 for the previous 12 months. Indeed, more Christians were killed in Syria alone during the more recent period than were killed globally in the previous year.

Can the Commission detail what it is doing to combat rising persecution against people of faith across the globe, and perhaps specifically what steps it is taking to ensure the safety of persecuted minorities in Syria?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(17 July 2014)

Over the last years, the EU has been stepping up its action in defense of freedom of religion or belief (FoRB). In 2009 and 2011 Conclusions, the Council highlighted EU's commitment to the promotion and protection of FoRB without any discrimination, and expressed its concern about the increasing number of acts of religious intolerance and violence, notably against Christians and their places of worship.

With the adoption of guidelines on FoRB in June 2013, the EU enhanced its dedication to defend this challenged universal freedom. These guidelines provide EU officials with practical guidance on how to seek to prevent violations of FoRB, to analyse cases, and to react effectively to violations wherever they occur.

Numerous statements and calls have been made to remind states of their primary duty to protect everyone — not least persons belonging to minorities — from violence, discrimination and other human rights violations. FoRB is addressed in depth during human rights dialogues with third countries and at every opportunity when deemed necessary, at bilateral or multilateral level. Specific FoRB projects are also supported, notably through the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights.

In the specific case of Syria, the EU stressed the need to preserve the country traditions of interreligious, inter-ethnic and cultural co-existence, and expressed its concern about the plight of all vulnerable groups, and ethnic and religious minorities, noting that Christians were increasingly targeted by extremist groups. The EU has been calling on all parties to the conflict to ensure the protection of the civilian population and to adhere to their obligations under international humanitarian and human rights law.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-003049/14

alla Commissione (Vicepresidente/Alto Rappresentante)

Oreste Rossi (PPE) e Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(14 marzo 2014)

Oggetto: VP/HR — Visita dell'Alto Rappresentante dell'UE in Iran — Prima visita di un capo della diplomazia europea dal 2008 — Un dialogo destinato a fallire

L'Alto Rappresentante per la politica estera dell'UE Catherine Ashton è giunta lo scorso 8 marzo a Teheran per la sua annunciata visita in Iran, la prima di un capo della diplomazia europea dal 2008, accompagnata da una delegazione «politico-economica». La Ashton ha incontrato il presidente Hassan Rohani, il presidente del parlamento Ali Larijani, il ministro degli Esteri Mohammad-Javad Zarif. I colloqui hanno riguardato le relazioni fra Iran e Unione europea e i negoziati fra la Repubblica islamica e il gruppo 5+1 sul nucleare.

Considerato il ruolo che l’Iran sta giocando nel destabilizzare la regione del Medio Oriente in Siria, nella Striscia di Gaza e in Iraq con finanziamenti e supporto logistico-militare verso terroristi e guerriglieri, può l'Alto Rappresentante precisare quanto segue:

Risposta dell'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente Catherine Ashton a nome della Commissione

(11 luglio 2014)

Durante la sua visita in Iran dall’8 al 10 marzo, l'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente ha avuto l’opportunità di discutere di questioni importanti connesse con le relazioni bilaterali Unione europea-Iran così come di una serie di questioni di carattere regionale e internazionale, come quelle riguardanti la Siria e l’Afghanistan con le controparti iraniane.

In realtà, il fatto che l’UE e l’Iran abbiano posizioni molto diverse su alcune questioni ribadisce la necessità di discuterne.

Le particolari questioni sollevate dall’onorevole deputato, relative agli attachi a Camp Liberty e Camp Ashraf in Iraq nonché all’intercettazione da parte di Israele di una nave nel Mar Rosso, non sono state oggetto di discussione.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-003049/14

to the Commission (Vice-President/High Representative)

Oreste Rossi (PPE) and Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(14 March 2014)

Subject: VP/HR — Visit by EU High Representative to Iran — First visit by European foreign policy chief since 2008 — Talks doomed to failure

On 8 March 2014, Catherine Ashton, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, travelled to Tehran on her announced visit to Iran, the first by a European foreign policy chief since 2008, accompanied by her ‘political and economic’ delegation. On this occasion, she met President Hassan Rohani, Ali Larijani, Speaker of Parliament, and Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif, to discuss relations between Iran and the European Union and the negotiations between the Islamic Republic and the 5+1 group regarding nuclear technology.

In view of the Iran's contribution to destabilising the Middle East in Syria, the Gaza Strip and Iraq, providing funding and logistic and military support for terrorist and guerrilla organisations:

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(11 July 2014)

During the HR/VP's visit to Iran from 8-10 March, she had the opportunity to discuss important issues relating to EU-Iran bilateral relations as well as a number of issues of regional and international character, such as those concerning Syria and Afghanistan, with her Iranian counterparts.

Although on some issues the EU and Iran have markedly different positions, this only underlines the necessity to discuss these matters.

As to the particular questions by the Honourable Parliamentarians relating to Camp Liberty and Camp Ashraf in Iraq, and the interception by Israel of a vessel in the Red Sea, these matters were not discussed.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-003089/14

alla Commissione (Vicepresidente/Alto Rappresentante)

Carlo Fidanza (PPE), Marco Scurria (PPE) e Magdi Cristiano Allam (EFD)

(17 marzo 2014)

Oggetto: VP/HR — Tutela della comunità italofona in Crimea

In questi giorni di alta tensione nella penisola di Crimea emergono tutte le preoccupazioni della piccola comunità italiana in Crimea, tra le 300 e le 500 persone discendenti di quelle famiglie italiane che, dopo la Rivoluzione d'Ottobre e in particolar modo nel 1942, hanno subito la persecuzione etnica e la deportazione nei gulag sovietici dell'Asia centrale.

Si tratta di una piccola comunità consolidatasi a partire dal XIX secolo durante l'epoca zarista, vittima di un martirio dimenticato, che ora teme di cadere vittima delle tensioni e della possibile guerra civile in Crimea.

Si interroga quindi l'Alto Rappresentante dell'Unione per gli affari esteri e la politica di sicurezza per sapere:

Risposta dell'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente Catherine Ashton a nome della Commissione

(10 luglio 2014)

L'UE è impegnata a sostenere l'unità, l'integrità territoriale, la sovranità e l'indipendenza dell'Ucraina. L'UE condanna con fermezza e non intende riconoscere l'annessione illegale della Crimea e di Sebastopoli da parte della Federazione russa.

L'UE è al corrente del deterioramento generale della situazione dei diritti umani in Crimea e invita tutte le parti a garantire il rispetto dei diritti delle persone appartenenti a minoranze nazionali in linea con le norme internazionali, in particolare quelle del Consiglio d'Europa.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-003089/14

to the Commission (Vice-President/High Representative)

Carlo Fidanza (PPE), Marco Scurria (PPE) and Magdi Cristiano Allam (EFD)

(17 March 2014)

Subject: VP/HR — Protecting the Italian-speaking community in Crimea

In these times of heightened tension in the Crimean peninsula, all the concerns of the small Italian community in Crimea are surfacing. This community is made up of between 300 and 500 descendants of those Italian families that were subjected to ethnic cleansing and deportation in the Soviet gulags of Central Asia following the October Revolution, in 1942 in particular.

This is a small community which was established around the start of the 19th century during the Tsarist period, casualty of a forgotten martyrdom, which is now living in fear of falling victim to the tensions and the potential civil war in Crimea.

We would therefore like to ask the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy the following questions:

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(10 July 2014)

The EU is committed to upholding Ukraine's unity, territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence. It strongly condemns the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol by the Russian Federation, which it will not recognise.

The EU is aware of the deterioration of the human rights situation in Crimea in general. It calls upon all parties to ensure the respect of the rights of people belonging to national minorities, in line with international standards, notably those of the Council of Europe.

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-003233/14

lill-Kummissjoni (Viċi President/Rappreżentant Għoli)

David Casa (PPE)

(19 ta' Marzu 2014)

Suġġett: VP/HR — Snipers Ukraini

Skont informazzjoni minn aħbarijiet reċenti bbażati fuq telefonata li nkixfet illegalment bejn il-VP/HR Catherine Ashton u l-Ministru għall-Affarijiet Barranin tal-Estonja, teżisti evidenza tal-preżenza ta' snipers fl-Ukraina (1).

Matul it-telefonata, il-mexxejja tkellmu dwar gruppi ta' provokaturi li kienu fil-pajjiż fi żmien il-protesti u li sparaw lejn id-dimostranti u l-pulizija. Huwa mifhum li dawn il-gruppi kienu jagħmlu parti mill-oppożizzjoni (allegatament mexxejja Maidan). Il-gvern ta' koalizzjoni l-ġdid ħabbar li mhux se jagħmel investigazzjonijiet dwar il-kwistjoni.

Matul it-telefonata, is-Sa Ashton semmiet il-possibilità ta' investigazzjoni potenzjali mill-UE.

Ġie deċiż jekk l-UE hijiex se tagħmel investigazzjoni? Jekk iva, il-Kummissjoni tista' tipprovdi aktar dettalji dwar il-kamp ta' applikazzjoni u n-natura ta' din l-investigazzjoni?

Tweġiba mogħtija mir-Rappreżentant Għoli/il-Viċi President Ashton f'isem il-Kummissjoni

(26 ta' Ġunju 2014)

L-identità ta’ min iwettaq ir-reat għandha tkun stabbilita b’investigazzjoni ġusta u trasparenti tal-kwistjoni, li għandha issir mill-awtoritajiet Ukraini. Dawk responsabbli jridu jittressqu quddiem il-ġustizzja. Il-Bord Konsultattiv Internazzjonali tal-Kunsill tal-Ewropa, inawgurat fid-9 ta’ April, se jagħti pariri fir-rigward tat-twettiq tal-proċeduri skont l-istandards internazzjonali.

Wara li l-Ukraina tkun irreġistrat r-rikonoxximent tagħha tal-ġurisdizzjoni tal-QKI għall-avvenimenti fil-perjodu bejn Novembru 2013 u Frar 2014, huwa f’idejn il-Prosekutur tal-QKI li jevalwa jekk hemmx biżżejjed evidenza biex tinbeda investigazzjoni. Inħeġġu lill-Ukrajna li tirratifika l-Istatut tal-QKI u li tiżgura li d-dispożizzjonijiet kostituzzjonali meħtieġa, fil-qafas tar-riforma kostituzzjonali komprensiva, huma adottati biex jagħmluh possibbli.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-003233/14

to the Commission (Vice-President/High Representative)

David Casa (PPE)

(19 March 2014)

Subject: VP/HR — Ukrainian Snipers

According to information from recent news based on a leaked phone call between VP/HR Catherine Ashton and the Estonian Minister for Foreign Affairs, there is evidence of the presence of snipers in Ukraine (2).

During the call, the leaders talked about groups of provocateurs being in the country at the time of the protests who shot both protesters and the police. These groups are believed to have been part of the opposition (allegedly Maidan leaders). The new coalition government has announced that they will not conduct any investigation into the matter.

During the call, Ms Ashton mentioned the possibility of a potential investigation by the EU.

Has it been decided whether or not the EU will carry out an investigation? If so, can the Commission provide further details on the scope and nature of this investigation?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(26 June 2014)

The identity of the perpetrators must be established by a fair and transparent investigation into the matter, which should be made by the Ukrainian authorities. Those responsible should be brought to justice. The International Advisory Panel of the Council of Europe, inaugurated on 9 April, will advise to the effect that all procedures are conducted in line with international standards.

After Ukraine has registered its recognition of the ICC jurisdiction for the events in the period ranging from November 2013 to February 2014, it is up to the Prosecutor of the ICC to assess whether there is enough evidence to open an investigation. We encourage Ukraine to ratify the ICC Statute and to ensure that the necessary constitutional provisions, in the framework of the comprehensive constitutional reform, are adopted to make it possible.

(Versiunea în limba română)

Întrebarea cu solicitare de răspuns scris E-003285/14

adresată Comisiei

Elena Băsescu (PPE)

(20 martie 2014)

Subiect: Perspectiva de aderare la Uniunea Europeană pentru statele din vecinătatea estică

În prezent există un focar de instabilitate în estul Europei, cu precădere în Ucraina, care până în acest moment s-a concretizat prin anexarea de către Federația Rusă a unei părți dintr-un stat suveran și independent. De asemenea, Rusia exercită o serie de alte presiuni asupra unor state precum Republica Moldova sau Georgia, scopul nedeclarat fiind abaterea acestora de la parcursul european. Totuși, acest parcurs are în acest moment ca finalitate semnarea Acordului de Asociere, întrucât Uniunea nu a oferit o foaie de parcurs privind o eventuală aderare pentru aceste state.

În lumina ultimelor evenimente la care asistăm în vecinătatea estică a Uniunii, se are în vedere oferirea unei perspective clare de aderare Republicii Moldova, Ucrainei și Georgiei?

Răspuns dat de dl Füle în numele Comisiei

(10 iulie 2014)

UE este ferm hotărâtă să se angajeze într-o asociere politică și o integrare economică mai strânse cu țările din cadrul Parteneriatului estic pe baza acordurilor de asociere (AA), inclusiv pe baza stabilirii zonelor de liber schimb aprofundate și cuprinzătoare (ZLSAC). Întrucât AA/ZLSAC vor fi implementate în fiecare țară în anii următori, partenerii estici au posibilitatea de a aborda provocările care există de mult timp în ceea ce privește statul de drept, transparența și reformele sectoriale. UE oferă deja un sprijin tehnic și financiar semnificativ care ar putea facilita consolidarea în continuare a relațiilor UE cu aceste țări. Guvernele din Georgia, Republica Moldova și Ucraina și-au exprimat dorința de a adera la UE la un moment dat și un procent semnificativ din populația fiecărei țări este în favoarea unor relații mai strânse cu UE. Declarația Summitului Parteneriatului estic din noiembrie 2013 a confirmat aspirațiile europene și perspectiva europeană exprimate de unii dintre parteneri. În declarația Summitului se menționează că respectarea valorilor comune și punerea în aplicare a acordurilor de asociere vor contribui la viitoare evoluții progresive în cadrul relațiilor bilaterale. În plus, în luna februarie, Consiliul Afaceri Externe a declarat că acordul de asociere nu constituie obiectivul final al cooperării UE-Ucraina.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-003285/14

to the Commission

Elena Băsescu (PPE)

(20 March 2014)

Subject: EU accession prospects for Eastern European partners

Growing instability in Eastern Europe, particularly Ukraine, is now culminating in the annexation of part of a sovereign and independent state by the Russian Federation, which is also bringing pressure to bear on other countries, such as the Republic of Moldova and Georgia, with the undeclared aim of drawing them away from Europe. However, the EU is currently offering theses countries' an association agreement only, as opposed to a roadmap for possible accession.

In view of the most recent developments affecting our Eastern European partners, does the EU intend to offer the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia clear prospects of accession?

Answer given by Mr Füle on behalf of the Commission

(10 July 2014)

The EU is firmly committed to closer political association and economic integration with its Eastern Partnerson the basis of Association Agreements (AAs), including the establishment of Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas (DCFTAs). As the AAs/DCFTAs are implemented in each country in coming years, Eastern Partners have the opportunity to tackle long-standing challenges with respect to the rule of law, transparency, and sector reforms. The EU is already providing significant financial and technical support that could facilitate further strengthening of EU relations with these countries. The governments of Georgia, Republic of Moldova and Ukraine have expressed an ambition to join the EU one day, and a signficant portion of each country's population favours a closer relationship with the EU. The November 2013 Eastern Partnership Summit declaration acknowledged the European aspirations and the European choice of some of its partners. The Summit declaration noted that respect for common values and implementation of Association Agreements would contribute to future progressive developments in the bilateral relationships. In addition, the Foreign Affairs Council stated in February that the Association Agreement does not constitute the final goal in EU-Ukraine cooperation.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-003456/14

alla Commissione

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(21 marzo 2014)

Oggetto: Instabilità in Europa dell'est e rischi per i paesi baltici

L'aumento delle tensioni nell'Est Europa, in particolare con l'annessione della Crimea alla Federazione russa e il rischio latente di un conflitto armato tra Kiev e Mosca, sta suscitando forti timori per la sicurezza dell'UE, nello specifico nei paesi baltici, dove le minoranze russe sono più ampie che in altri Stati membri e la cui storia ricorda una dominazione cinquantennale da parte dell'Unione sovietica.

Alcuni esponenti politici europei hanno già cercato di attrarre l'attenzione delle istituzioni europee e della Nato sui timori delle tre repubbliche baltiche, anche se per ora l'attenzione sembra concentrata essenzialmente sulla penisola della Crimea.

In merito a questi appelli in difesa delle tre repubbliche baltiche, la Commissione:

Risposta dell'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente Catherine Ashton a nome della Commissione

(10 luglio 2014)

L'UE ha seguito sin dall'inizio questi sviluppi e ha adottato misure nei confronti di diverse persone ed entità, in Russia e in Ucraina, che compromettono o minacciano l'integrità territoriale, la sovranità e l'indipendenza dell'Ucraina. L'UE continuerà a valutare le relazioni con la Federazione russa alla luce degli sviluppi e ne trarrà le necessarie conclusioni.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-003456/14

to the Commission

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(21 March 2014)

Subject: Instability in Eastern Europe and the risks for the Baltic States

The rising tensions in Eastern Europe, particularly with the annexation of the Crimea by the Russian Federation and the latent threat of armed conflict between Kiev and Moscow, are raising serious fears for the security of the EU, and more especially of the Baltic countries, which has larger Russian minorities than the other Member States and which experienced half a century of Russian domination.

Some European politicians have already tried to draw the attention of the EU institutions and NATO to the concerns of the three Baltic republics, even if for the time being that attention is centred mainly on the Crimean peninsula.

Can the Commission state, in response to these calls to protect the three Baltic republics:

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(10 July 2014)

The EU has from the outset followed these developments and taken measures against a number of individuals and entities in Russia and Ukraine responsible for undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. It will keep assessing relations to the Russian Federation in the light of the developments and draw the necessary conclusions.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-003475/14

to the Commission

Charles Tannock (ECR)

(21 March 2014)

Subject: Application of EU privacy law with regard to criminals

Just under a decade ago, a Midlands police force in the UK became a national laughing stock when, under advice from lawyers working for the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO), it refused to publish the photographs of two escaped convicts on the grounds that to do so would constitute a violation of their rights to privacy. It was left to the Attorney General to point out that this advice was erroneous. A report on legal secrecy in Austria in a recent edition of Private Eye observed drily that even ‘Wanted’ posters for criminals are routinely pixelated, whilst in the UK documentaries, news reports or Police Camera Action-type programmes involving high-speed car chases also frequently pixelate the faces of people committing criminal acts, even when convictions have been secured in the courts or where no criminal prosecution is pending. This would be understandable if the person were a suspect in an on-going court case, and UK courts sometimes protect the identity of criminals if certain circumstances, for example the age of the criminal, provide grounds for doing so. Restrictions designed to ensure a fair trial or, in special cases, afford protection to a criminal adjudged by the courts to be especially vulnerable should not, of course, be confused with the right to privacy; criminal acts are, of their nature, public offences against the community and can never be ‘private’ acts.

Can the Commission confirm its understanding that, under EU data protection and privacy laws, there is nothing which, of itself, can be used to prevent publication of the faces of criminals or which would require pixelation of audiovisual footage that shows the faces of people committing criminal offences?

Answer given by Ms Malmström on behalf of the Commission

(14 July 2014)

The decision whether or not to publish photographs or make available to the public other images of convicted persons or people committing criminal offences will depend on the situation of each case.

For example, the identity of convicted persons may be kept secret by way of a court anonymity order. Such was the situation in the case of the child cruelty case in the UK known initially as Baby P. In this case the court issued an anonymity order preventing the publication of the names of the convicted persons to protect the identity, and hence the privacy, of Baby Peter's four siblings. The convicted persons could also not be named initially because they were involved in another trial and there was a risk of prejudice. The anonymity order was lifted when the remaining children were being cared for and when the second trial was completed. The judge said the identities of those involved had to be released to maintain public confidence in the judicial system.

There is no EU legislation which specifically prevents publication of the faces of criminals or which would require pixilation of audiovisual footage that shows the faces of people committing criminal offences. The publication of photos of wanted criminals by the police constitutes processing of personal data. In cases of cross-border exchange of personal data between Member States' police and judicial authorities, the processing of such data needs to comply with the requirements of Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA. The Data Protection Directive for the police and the judiciary proposed by the Commission in January 2012 will apply to both domestic processing and cross-border transfers of personal data (3).

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-003545/14

alla Commissione

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE) e Oreste Rossi (PPE)

(24 marzo 2014)

Oggetto: Cooperazione UE — Stati terzi nelle missioni e operazioni PSDC

Già nel novembre 2013 il Consiglio Affari esteri aveva accolto positivamente il contributo di partner extra-europei alle missioni e operazioni nel quadro della PSDC e già in passato alcuni di questi paesi hanno partecipato a questo genere di missioni, come nel caso dell'Ucraina, che con una fregata ha preso parte alle operazioni della missione EUNAVFOR-Atalanta, o della Georgia, nella recente EUFOR CAR Bangui.

In merito a questa cooperazione, può la Commissione:

Risposta dell'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente Catherine Ashton a nome della Commissione

(15 luglio 2014)

La dimensione di partenariato della PSDC è stata sottolineata nelle conclusioni del Consiglio del novembre 2013 e in quelle del Consiglio europeo del dicembre 2013.

La cooperazione PSDC con i partner si inserisce pienamente nei contesti convenuti e rispetta il principio fondamentale dell'autonomia decisionale dell'UE.

Circa 45 Stati non appartenenti all'UE hanno preso parte a missioni e operazioni nell'ambito della politica estera e di sicurezza comune dell'UE. Nel 2003 quindici paesi terzi hanno partecipato alla missione di polizia dell'Unione europea in Bosnia-Erzegovina, la prima missione nell'ambito della PSDC. Da allora, i paesi terzi sono presenti in quasi tutte le operazioni e missioni della PSDC.

Vari sono gli esempi di cooperazione e attività di vantaggio reciproco perseguite unitamente alle missioni PSDC: il Canada ha contribuito economicamente a un progetto in materia di gestione delle risorse umane realizzato dall'EUTM Mali.

Nel 2014 vari paesi partner hanno offerto nuovi contributi alle missioni e alle operazioni della PSDC. L'Ucraina ha partecipato con la sua nave ammiraglia a EUNAVFOR Atalanta. La Georgia è diventata il secondo principale attore della missione EUFOR RCA, dispiegando una compagnia di fanteria leggera (156 soldati).

A partire dal 2004 l'UE ha introdotto l'accordo quadro di partecipazione per facilitare la rapida partecipazione a missioni e operazioni in ambito PSDC. Ad oggi quindici paesi hanno firmato l'accordo: Albania, Canada, Cile, ex Repubblica jugoslava di Macedonia, Georgia, Islanda, Repubblica di Moldova, Montenegro, Norvegia, Nuova Zelanda, Serbia, Repubblica di Corea, Turchia, Stati Uniti, Ucraina. Sono in procinto di essere firmati accordi quadro di cooperazione anche con l'Australia e la Bosnia-Erzegovina, mentre l'accordo con la Colombia è nella fase finale.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-003545/14

to the Commission

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE) and Oreste Rossi (PPE)

(24 March 2014)

Subject: EU cooperation with third countries in CSDP missions

In November 2013, the Foreign Affairs Council said that it welcomed the contribution of non-EU partners in CSDP (Common Security and Defence Policy) missions and operations; some of those countries have indeed already participated in such missions, such as Ukraine, which sent a frigate to take part in the Eunavfor — Atalanta mission, or Georgia, which joined the recent EUFOR CAR Bangui mission.

With regard to this cooperation, can the Commission:

Answer given by HR/VP Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(15 July 2014)

The Partnership dimension of CSDP was highlighted in both the conclusions of the Council in November 2013 and of the European Council in December 2013.

CSDP cooperation with partners stays fully within the existing agreed frameworks and respects the fundamental principle of EU decision making autonomy.

Approximately 45 non-EU states have participated in missions and operations under the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy. In 2003, 15 third states participated in the EU Police Mission in Bosnia-Herzegovina. — the first CSDP mission. Since then, third states have been present in almost all CSDP operations and missions.

There are also various examples of mutually beneficial cooperation and activities pursued hand in hand with CSDP missions: e.g. Canada has financially contributed to a project in human resources management run by EUTM Mali.

In 2014, several partner countries offered new contributions to CSDP missions and operations. Ukraine participated with its flagship in Eunavfor Atalanta. Georgia has become the second largest contributor to EUFOR RCA, deploying one light infantry company (156 troops).

As of 2004, the EU has introduced the framework Participation Agreement (FPA) to facilitate speedy involvement in CSDP missions and operations. Fifteen countries have signed such agreements to date: Albania; Canada; Chile; former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia; Georgia; Iceland; Republic of Moldova; Montenegro; Norway; New Zealand; Serbia; Republic of Korea; Turkey; United States; Ukraine. In addition to this FPAs are ready to be signed with Australia and Bosnia-Herzegovina, while the agreement with Colombia is in the final stages.

(Versiunea în limba română)

Întrebarea cu solicitare de răspuns scris P-003562/14

adresată Comisiei (Vicepreședintelui/Înaltului Reprezentant)

Corina Creţu (S&D)

(24 martie 2014)

Subiect: VP/HR — Reacția Uniunii Europene cu privire la situația din Transnistria

Lipsa unei reacții ferme și unitare a Uniunii Europene la gestul Federației Ruse de anexare a Crimeii transmite, în continuare, unde de șoc în întreaga lume. Mai mult decât atât, Rusia pare să fi rămas neintimidată de ceea ce mulți consideră a fi doar sancțiuni superficiale din partea Europei. Lipsită de solidaritatea de care ar fi nevoie într-un asemenea context și slăbită intern de atitudinile antieuropene ale partidelor radicale, Uniunea Europeană demonstrează că îi este încă dificil să dea un răspuns pe măsura provocărilor. La fel de periculoasă este, însă, și lipsa de reacție cu privire la riscurile la adresa securității din zona Transnistriei, asupra căreia oficialii NATO și-au exprimat deja îngrijorarea.

Ar fi un semn de profundă slăbiciune dacă Uniunea Europeană nu ar formula o strategie unitară nici cu privire la eventualele amenințări asupra integrității teritoriale a Republicii Moldova, stat unanim lăudat de instituțiile europene pentru progresele sale. Este, fără îndoială, nevoie urgentă de o strategie comună a statelor membre.

Ce măsuri are în vedere Înaltul Reprezentant pentru a preîntâmpina o situație total nedorită în imediata noastră vecinătate și pentru a demonstra, în același timp, forța și unitatea Uniunii Europene?

Răspuns dat de Înaltul Reprezentant/doamna vicepreședinte Ashton în numele Comisiei

(14 iulie 2014)

Uniunea Europeană dă dovadă în prezent de o solidaritate deosebită cu Republica Moldova. La 15 mai 2014, a avut loc la Bruxelles o reuniune la nivel înalt fără precedent între UE și Republica Moldova, președintele Consiliului European a efectuat o vizită la Chișinău la 13 mai 2014, urmată de vizita președintelui Comisiei Europene la 12 iunie 2014. Uniunea Europeană și Republica Moldova și-au consolidat în mod semnificativ relațiile prin semnarea unui acord de asociere, incluzând o zonă de liber schimb aprofundată și cuprinzătoare, la 27 iunie 2014. Liberalizarea vizelor între Republica Moldova și zona Schengen a intrat în vigoare la 28 aprilie 2014. În plus, UE oferă Republicii Moldova un sprijin tehnic și financiar considerabil (peste 130 de milioane EUR în 2013), aceasta devenind astfel unul dintre cei mai importanți beneficiari ai ajutorului acordat de UE pe cap de locuitor. Recent, Uniunea Europeană a crescut contingentele tarifare scutite de taxe vamale acordate Republicii Moldova pentru vinuri și anumite fructe și legume, facilitând astfel exporturile esențiale ale Republicii Moldova către UE.

(English version)

Question for written answer P-003562/14

to the Commission (Vice-President/High Representative)

Corina Creţu (S&D)

(24 March 2014)

Subject: VP/HR — European Union response in view of the situation in Transnistria

The absence of a firm and united response from the European Union to the Russian Federation's annexation of Crimea is continuing to send a shockwave around the world. Furthermore, Russia appears not to have been intimidated by what many consider to be no more than superficial sanctions on the part of Europe. Lacking the solidarity called for by such a situation, and internally weakened by the anti-European attitudes of radical parties, the European Union is showing that it is still difficult for it to meet the challenges facing it. However, this failure to respond is equally dangerous in view of the risks to the security of the Transnistrian region, on which NATO officials have already expressed concern.

It would be a sign of profound weakness if the European Union were unable to draw up a united strategy on possible threats to the territorial integrity of the Republic of Moldova, a country whose progress has received unanimous praise from the European institutions. There can be no doubt as to the urgent need for the Member States to adopt a joint strategy.

What steps is the High Representative planning to take in order to avert a wholly undesirable situation in our immediate neighbourhood and at the same time demonstrate the European Union's strength and unity?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-PresidentVice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(14 July 2014)

The European Union is currently showing substantial solidarity with the Republic of Moldova. An unprecedented EU-Moldovan executive to executive meeting took place on 15 May 2014 in Brussels, the President of the European Council visited Chisinau on 13 May 2014 and the President of the European Commission on 12 June 2014. The EU and the Republic of Moldova significantly enhanced their relations by signing an Association Agreement including a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area on 27 June 2014. Visa liberalisation between the Republic of Moldova and the Schengen zone took effect on 28 April 2014. Moreover, the EU is supporting the Republic of Moldova with considerable financial and technical support (over EUR 130 million in 2013), making it one of the largest EU aid recipient per capita. Only recently, has the European Union increased Moldovan tariff free quotas for wine and certain fruits and vegetables, thereby facilitating critical Moldovan exports to the EU.

(Version française)

Question avec demande de réponse écrite E-003572/14

au Conseil

Franck Proust (PPE)

(24 mars 2014)

Objet: Défense commune

Les récents événements ont montré la faiblesse de la réponse européenne commune en matière de résolution de conflit. Depuis 1957, on parle de défense commune et, pourtant, rien n'a encore été fait. Une défense commune doit être envisagée par les États membres. L'Europe pourra alors être à même de répondre aux menaces grandissantes provenant des pays tiers ainsi que d'intervenir dans des conflits impliquant l'un de ses alliés.

Réponse

(8 juillet 2014)

Pour faire suite aux conclusions du Conseil européen de décembre 2012, par lesquelles il demandait de renforcer la politique de sécurité et de défense commune (PSDC) de l'UE, la Commission européenne, la Haute Représentante, l'Agence européenne de défense et les États membres se sont attelés résolument à cette tâche. Cela a permis au Conseil européen d'adopter, en décembre dernier, d'importantes conclusions sur la PSDC, selon lesquelles il faut en priorité:

Le Conseil européen évaluera en juin 2015 les progrès concrets accomplis sur toutes ces questions et fournira de nouvelles orientations.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-003572/14

to the Council

Franck Proust (PPE)

(24 March 2014)

Subject: Common defence

Recent events have highlighted the weakness of Europe's joint response in the field of conflict resolution. Common defence has been under discussion since 1957, but nothing has been done. The Member States should give consideration to common defence. Europe would then be in a better position to respond to the growing threats from third countries and intervene in conflicts involving one of its allies.

Reply

(8 July 2014)

In response to the December 2012 European Council conclusions calling for a stronger EU Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), important work has been undertaken by the European Commission, the High Representative, the European Defence Agency and the Member States. This led to the endorsement last December by the European Council of substantial conclusions on CSDP. Priority actions cover:

The European Council will assess concrete progress on all issues in June 2015 and provide further guidance.

(Ελληνική έκδοση)

Ερώτηση με αίτημα γραπτής απάντησης E-003628/14

προς την Επιτροπή

Antigoni Papadopoulou (S&D)

(25 Μαρτίου 2014)

Θέμα: Μνημόνια και τρέχουσες επείγουσες ανάγκες

Με δεδομένο πως λόγω της οικονομικής κρίσης και των συνεπειών της στις χώρες των μνημονίων υπάρχει ανάγκη:

ερωτάται η Επιτροπή:

Τι προτίθεται να πράξει για να αντιμετωπίσει την καθεμιά από τις επείγουσες πιο πάνω ανάγκες και πώς;

Απάντηση του κ. Kallas εξ ονόματος της Επιτροπής

(15 Ιουλίου 2014)

Όσον αφορά τις ΜΜΕ, λαμβάνονται ειδικά μέτρα σε επίπεδο ΕΕ για να διευκολυνθεί η πρόσβασή τους σε χρηματοδότηση. Με την υποστήριξη των ευρωπαϊκών διαρθρωτικών και επενδυτικών ταμείων, το ποσό της χρηματοδότησης για τις ΜΜΕ αναμένεται να διπλασιασθεί, από 70 σε 140 δισ. ευρώ, για την περίοδο 2014-2020. Η διαθέσιμη χρηματοδότηση σε επίπεδο ΕΕ για μέσα χρηματοδότησης που βασίζονται σε μόχλευση θα αυξηθεί επίσης σημαντικά, σε περίπου 4 δισ. ευρώ. Επιπλέον, η Επιτροπή και η ΕΤΕπ καταβάλλουν προσπάθειες για να επεκταθούν τα κοινά μέσα χρηματοδότησης με επιμερισμό του κινδύνου, με στόχο τη μόχλευση επενδύσεων στις ΜΜΕ από τον ιδιωτικό τομέα και τις κεφαλαιαγορές.

Η βελτίωση του επιχειρηματικού περιβάλλοντος παραμένει επίσης πρωταρχικός στόχος στο θεματολόγιο της Επιτροπής. Εκτός από τη μείωση του διοικητικού φόρτου για τις ΜΜΕ στο πλαίσιο του προγράμματος βελτίωσης της καταλληλότητας και της αποδοτικότητας του κανονιστικού πλαισίου, η Επιτροπή θα εγκρίνει δέσμη μέτρων για την κυκλική οικονομία, που περιλαμβάνει πράσινο σχέδιο δράσης για τις ΜΜΕ με δράσεις ενίσχυσης της πράσινης επιχειρηματικότητας για τις επιχειρήσεις του μέλλοντος.

Η Επιτροπή συνεργάζεται με τα κράτη μέλη που επωφελούνται από τη χρηματοδοτική συνδρομή, ώστε να διασφαλιστεί ότι το βάρος της προσαρμογής κατανέμεται κατά τον πλέον δίκαιο τρόπο. Η Επιτροπή δεσμεύεται πλήρως να στηρίξει τις χώρες κατά την εφαρμογή των εθνικών σχεδίων υλοποίησης των εγγυήσεων για τη νεολαία (4).

Στο πλαίσιο της αντιμετώπισης της χρηματοπιστωτικής κρίσης, τα θεσμικά όργανα της ΕΕ συμφώνησαν σε μια δέσμη μέτρων για να βελτιωθεί η ροή της χρηματοδότησης της ΕΕ, ιδίως στις χώρες που υπάγονται σε πρόγραμμα, η οποία περιλαμβάνει την αύξηση της προχρηματοδότησης, την απλούστευση των διοικητικών διαδικασιών, τη μείωση της εθνικής συγχρηματοδότησης και την αναθεώρηση του προγράμματος με έμφαση στην ανεργία των νέων και στις ΜΜΕ. Τα μέτρα αυτά έχουν συμβάλει επιτυχώς στην επίσπευση της απορρόφησης κονδυλίων της ΕΕ στις χώρες που υπάγονται σε πρόγραμμα.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-003628/14

to the Commission

Antigoni Papadopoulou (S&D)

(25 March 2014)

Subject: The Memoranda and current urgent needs

Given that, because of the economic crisis and its consequences for euro area programme countries, it is necessary:

Will the Commission say:

What does it intend to do to address each of the urgent needs set out above and how will it go about this task?

Answer given by Mr Kallas on behalf of the Commission

(15 July 2014)

For SMEs, specific measures are being taken at EU level to facilitate access to finance. With the support of the European Structural and Investment Funds, the amount of funding for SMEs should double from EUR 70 to 140 billion for the period 2014-2020. EU-level funding available for leverage-based financial instruments will also increase significantly to some EUR 4 billion. Moreover, the Commission and the EIB are working to expand joint risk-sharing financial instruments to leverage private sector and capital market investments in SMEs.

Improving the business environment is also very high on the Commission's agenda. Apart from reducing administrative burden for SMEs as part of its Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme, the Commission will adopt a circular economy package, which includes a Green action plan for SMEs with actions to support green entrepreneurship for the companies of the future.

The Commission works with the Member States benefiting from the financial assistance to ensure that the adjustment burden is shared in the most equitable way possible. The Commission is fully committed to support countries in the implementation of their National Youth Guarantee plans (5).

As part of their response to the financial crisis, the EU institutions agreed to a package of measures to improve the flow of EU financing, especially in programme Countries, including higher pre-financing, simplification of administrative procedures, reduction of national co-financing, re-programming a focusing on youth unemployment and SMEs, These measures have been successful in accelerating EU funds absorption in programme countries.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-003810/14

alla Commissione

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE) e Oreste Rossi (PPE)

(27 marzo 2014)

Oggetto: Forniture di apparecchiature non letali statunitensi ai ribelli siriani

Il Dipartimento di Stato americano sta organizzando un canale di assistenza diretto alle forze ribelli siriane per un valore di circa 10 milioni di dollari. Si tratta di strumentazione non letale, come ad esempio ambulanze, strumentazione per la comunicazione e mezzi di trasporto. Questi aiuti fanno parte di un pacchetto di 80 milioni di dollari deciso nel 2012, ma di recente bloccato a causa dell'insicurezza che regna nel paese e dell'impossibilità di garantire canali sicuri per le forniture. Il sostegno americano ha potuto riprendere solo dopo che le forze di opposizione sono state in grado di aprire un corridoio tra il confine turco e Aleppo.

Mentre a livello internazionale la diplomazia non sembra in grado di porre fine al conflitto e gli Stati Uniti hanno ripreso le proprie forniture verso le forze di opposizione al regime di Assad, può la Commissione riferire quali sono i principali strumenti di sostegno che l'UE sta fornendo, al fine di garantire una rapida soluzione del conflitto e il rispetto dei diritti fondamentali e del diritto umanitario internazionale?

Risposta dell'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente Catherine Ashton a nome della Commissione

(10 luglio 2014)

L'Unione europea (Commissione e Stati membri) ha già fornito 2,8 miliardi di euro in aiuti umanitari e allo sviluppo per azioni in Siria e nei paesi confinanti in risposta alla crisi (di cui 1,3 miliardi stanziati sul bilancio dell'UE) ed è quindi il maggior donatore in questa crisi. Il sostegno fornito mira ad aiutare la popolazione a far fronte agli effetti della crisi sia a breve termine (assistenza umanitaria di soccorso) sia nel lungo periodo (sviluppo delle capacità delle organizzazioni siriane della società civile, sostegno all'istruzione e alla sussistenza, ecc.). In questo contesto, l'UE si è valsa di tutti i canali esistenti per far giungere l'assistenza alle popolazioni che ne hanno bisogno. In particolare, l'UE ha impegnato 10 milioni di euro per fornire assistenza non umanitaria ai residenti di zone del nord della Siria difficili da raggiungere e controllate dall'opposizione, nonché per sostenere le strutture recentemente costituite dall'opposizione siriana migliorandone i processi di erogazione dei servizi.

L'UE collabora inoltre con l'ONU e con altri soggetti internazionali per migliorare l'accesso dell'assistenza umanitaria in Siria. Si è più volte rivolta direttamente alle autorità siriane, ai sostenitori internazionali e regionali del regime e alle forze di opposizione per chiedere di agevolare il transito dei convogli umanitari attraverso le linee di conflitto e le frontiere. L'UE ha anche dato un sostegno attivo all'adozione, avvenuta all'unanimità, della risoluzione n. 2139 del Consiglio di sicurezza dell'ONU, che invita a porre in atto misure volte a migliorare la situazione umanitaria in loco e prevede un meccanismo mensile per controllare i progressi compiuti. L'UE sosterrà tutte le misure volte a garantire la piena attuazione della risoluzione n. 2139 del Consiglio di sicurezza.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-003810/14

to the Commission

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE) and Oreste Rossi (PPE)

(27 March 2014)

Subject: US deliveries of nonlethal aid to Syrian rebels

The US State Department is arranging to provide Syrian rebel forces with direct aid to the value of some ten million US dollars. This aid will take the form of nonlethal supplies, such as ambulances, communications equipment and means of transport, and forms part of an 80-million-dollar package agreed in 2012 but recently blocked because of prevailing insecurity in the country and the impossibility of guaranteeing secure delivery channels. US support is being resumed now that the opposition forces have been able to open a corridor between the Turkish border and Aleppo.

Since international diplomacy seems incapable of putting an end to the conflict, and since the US has resumed deliveries to the forces opposing Assad’s regime, can the Commission provide information on the main types of support the EU is providing to ensure a rapid solution to the conflict and to guarantee respect of fundamental rights and of international humanitarian law?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(10 July 2014)

The EU (Commission and Member States) has provided so far EUR 2.8 billion in humanitarian and development assistance for actions in Syria and in neighbouring countries in response to the crisis (of which 1.3 billion through the EU budget), making the EU the biggest donor in this crisis. This supports aims at helping the affected population coping with the effects of the crisis, both in the short term (humanitarian life-saving assistance) and in the longer term (capacity-building of Syrian Civil society Organisation, support to Education and livelihoods, etc…). Within this context, the EU has used all existing channels of assistance to reach the population in need. The EU has notably allocated EUR 10 million to the delivery of non-humanitarian assistance to the population in Syria living in hard-to-reach areas in Northern Syria controlled by the opposition and support to the recently formed Syrian opposition structures through the improvement of service delivery processes.

The EU is also working with the UN and other international partners on enabling humanitarian access in Syria. The EU has repeatedly reached out directly to the Syrian authorities as well as to international and regional supporters of the regime and the opposition forces to facilitate cross-line and cross-border entry for humanitarian convoys. The EU has also actively supported a successful adoption, on a unanimous vote, of the UNSC resolution 2139, which calls for all measures to improve the humanitarian situation on the ground and envisions a monthly progress review mechanism. The EU will support all measures leading to the full implementation of UNSC resolution 2139.

(Version française)

Question avec demande de réponse écrite E-003835/14

à la Commission

Marc Tarabella (S&D)

(27 mars 2014)

Objet: Croissance bleue

L'exécutif européen estime que les ressources océaniques pourraient créer environ 5,4 millions d'emplois à l'intérieur de l'Union européenne et quelque 500 milliards de chiffre d'affaires annuel.

Alors que nous avons des difficultés à sortir de la récession et que les ressources terrestres s'épuisent, il est logique de nous tourner vers les océans.

Des études européennes montrent que les océans pourraient combler les trois quarts des besoins en énergie de l'Union d'ici 2030. Le bouquet énergétique maritime serait constitué de l'exploitation d'énergies provenant de différentes sources: les vagues (énergie houlomotrice), les marées (énergie marémotrice), la conversion des différences de température (énergie thermique maritime) et les gradients de salinité (énergie osmotique).

La Commission a-t-elle également mesuré avec précision les éventuels dommages à l'environnement? Si oui, quels sont-ils?

Réponse donnée par Mme Damanaki au nom de la Commission

(16 juillet 2014)

Les premières études à ce sujet citées dans la littérature scientifique (6) montrent que les incidences sur l'environnement des installations exploitant l'énergie océanique sont limitées. Dans certains cas, les installations utilisant des sources d'énergie renouvelables

peuvent en réalité se révéler bénéfiques pour certains écosystèmes: les parcs d'éoliennes en mer pourraient par exemple fournir un habitat pour des organismes vivant dans les profondeurs.

Il sera possible de réaliser une évaluation plus complète lorsqu'un plus grand nombre d'installations seront opérationnelles et que le bilan de la surveillance des effets sur l'environnement sera disponible. Le manque d'informations sur l'environnement marin est un problème important, d'autant plus que la surface des fonds marins reste encore relativement peu explorée, contrairement à la surface terrestre émergée. C'est pourquoi la Commission a engagé des travaux dans le cadre de l'initiative «Connaissance du milieu marin 2020» visant à assurer un accès facile et gratuit aux données sur le milieu marin et leur interopérabilité: une carte multirésolution de l'ensemble des fonds marins et de la colonne d'eau supérieure des eaux européennes sera réalisée d'ici 2020. En outre, le programme Horizon 2020 est un instrument efficace pour encourager la commercialisation de technologies d'exploitation de l'énergie océanique. Selon les estimations, entre 10 500 et 26 500 emplois permanents et jusqu'à 14 000 emplois temporaires pourraient être créés dans ce secteur d'ici à 2035 (7).

Les incidences sur l'environnement de l'énergie océanique sont dûment prises en considération dans le cadre des travaux du Forum sur l'énergie océanique consacrés aux aspects environnementaux.

La directive relative à la planification de l'espace maritime et la directive-cadre «stratégie pour le milieu marin» (8) pourraient s'appliquer de manière pertinente dans le domaine du développement et de l'exploitation des installations utilisant l'énergie océanique. La première impose aux États membres de prendre en compte les interactions terre-mer, et la seconde fait obligation aux États membres d'atteindre un «bon état écologique», défini grâce à un ensemble de descripteurs tels que la biodiversité, les niveaux d'introduction d'énergie, y compris de sources sonores sous-marines, dans le milieu marin, et l'intégrité des fonds marins, d'ici 2020.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-003835/14

to the Commission

Marc Tarabella (S&D)

(27 March 2014)

Subject: Blue growth

The European executive believes that ocean resources could create around 5.4 million jobs within the European Union, and an annual turnover of some 500 billion.

Given that we are experiencing difficulties in emerging from the recession, and that land-based resources are running out, it makes sense to turn our attention to the oceans.

European studies show that the oceans could supply three quarters of EU energy needs by 2030. The maritime energy mix would involve exploiting energies from various sources: waves (wave energy), tides (tidal energy), converting temperature differences (ocean thermal energy conversion), and salinity gradients (osmotic energy).

Has the Commission made a careful assessment of possible instances of harm to the environment? If it has, what are they?

Answer given by Ms Damanaki on behalf of the Commission

(16 July 2014)

Initial studies reported in scientific literature (9) indicate that the environmental impacts of ocean energy installations are limited. In some cases renewable energy installations may actually benefit ecosystems — for instance the bases of wind platforms could provide habitats for bottom-dwelling organisms.

A full assessment will become possible as larger commercial arrays come on stream and the results of environmental monitoring become available. The lack of information about the marine environment is an important problem, especially given that the seabed remains relatively unexplored compared to land. This is why the Commission has started work under Marine Knowledge 2020 that aims to ensure that marine data is interoperable, easily and freely accessible: a multi-resolution map of the entire seabed and overlying water column of European waters is to be in place by 2020. Furthermore, Horizon 2020 is a powerful tool that can drive the commercialisation of ocean energy technologies. Estimates predict that the sector could create around 10 500-26 500 permanent jobs and up to 14 000 temporary jobs by 2035 (10).

The environmental impact of ocean energy is closely looked at under the environmental work stream under the Ocean Energy Forum. 

The Marine Spatial Planning Directive and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (11) may be relevant for the development and operation of ocean energy installations. The former requires Member States to take into account land-sea interactions, while the latter requires Member States to achieve ‘Good Environmental Status’ by 2020, across a number of descriptors such as biodiversity, underwater energy/noise and seafloor integrity.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-003875/14

alla Commissione

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(28 marzo 2014)

Oggetto: Sviluppo e diffusione di droni sottomarini

Nonostante quando si parla di droni ci si riferisca per lo più a veicoli aerei a comando remoto, in realtà i robot senza pilota a bordo stanno conoscendo un certo successo anche nell'ambito sottomarino. Questi robot vengono utilizzati per numerosi scopi — di natura scientifica, metereologica, umanitaria o militare. Riuscendo a muoversi anche ad altissime profondità, difficilmente raggiungibili con altri mezzi, i droni subacquei sono in grado di raccogliere informazioni capaci di rendere più precise le previsioni relative a eventi naturali come gli uragani, spesso influenzati dalla temperatura degli oceani a grandi profondità, o di studiare l'inquinamento delle acque, la trasformazione della flora marina o i grandi spostamenti migratori della fauna subacquea. Tali droni sottomarini potrebbero essere utilizzati anche a scopi di monitoraggio di attività umane, come ad esempio per sondare le acque alla ricerca di barconi di immigrati, o per monitorare in sicurezza le attività militari di altri Stati.

In merito all'uso di questi droni, può la Commissione specificare se — nel contesto delle azioni volte a creare una strategia di sicurezza marittima dell'UE così come descritta dal Parlamento europeo e avvalorata dalle conclusioni del Consiglio europeo sulla difesa del dicembre 2013 — intende promuovere lo sviluppo di questi strumenti? Sono essi già stati utilizzati dalle forze armate europee impegnate in missioni PSDC, come ad esempio nella missione EUNAVFOR Atalanta?

Risposta dell'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente Catherine Ashton a nome della Commissione

(15 luglio 2014)

La strategia di sicurezza marittima dell'UE, adottata il 24 giugno 2014, non fa espressa menzione dei droni subacquei, né questi sono stati mai utilizzati dalle forze armate europee coinvolte nelle missioni PESD come, ad esempio, l’operazione EUNAVFOR Atalanta.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-003875/14

to the Commission

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(28 March 2014)

Subject: Development and more widespread use of underwater drones

When we talk about drones, we are normally referring to remote-controlled aircraft. However, unmanned craft are also being used increasingly frequently under water, for a wide variety of purposes — scientific, meteorological, humanitarian and military. Because they can operate at great depths which are otherwise difficult to reach, underwater drones can gather information which makes it possible to forecast with greater accuracy natural events, such as hurricanes, which can be triggered by water temperatures at lower ocean depths, or to study pollution, changes to marine flora or migratory movements of underwater fauna. Underwater drones could also be used to monitor human activities, such as movements of small boats carrying illegal immigrants, or to eavesdrop in complete safety on the military activities of other states.

Can the Commission say whether — in the context of moves to establish an EU maritime security strategy, as outlined by Parliament and approved by the Council of Defence Ministers in the conclusions of its December 2013 meeting — it intends to encourage the development of underwater drones? Have such drones already been used by European armed forces involved in ESDP missions, such as Eunavfor Atalanta?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(15 July 2014)

Underwater drones are not mentioned in the EU Maritime Security Strategy adopted on 24 June 2014. Neither have they been used by European armed forces involved in ESDP missions, such as Eunavfor Atalanta.

(Ελληνική έκδοση)

Ερώτηση με αίτημα γραπτής απάντησης E-003960/14

προς την Επιτροπή

Nikolaos Chountis (GUE/NGL)

(31 Μαρτίου 2014)

Θέμα: Έλεγχος λειτουργίας ελληνικών τελωνείων

Σύμφωνα με δημοσιεύματα, μια από τις εκκρεμότητες στις διαπραγματεύσεις της ελληνικής κυβέρνησης με την Τρόικα (Επιτροπή, ΔΝΤ και ΕΚΤ) είναι «ο έλεγχος των ελληνικών τελωνείων και των ηλεκτρονικών εφαρμογών παρακολούθησης της κίνησης και των πληρωμών εκτελωνισμού των εμπορευμάτων, με στόχο τον περιορισμό της φοροδιαφυγής, της διαφθοράς και του λαθρεμπορίου».

Με δεδομένα τα παραπάνω, ερωτάται η Επιτροπή:

Απάντηση του κ. Kallas εξ ονόματος της Επιτροπής

(9 Ιουλίου 2014)

Αναλυτική περιγραφή της προόδου που έχει σημειωθεί και των επόμενων βημάτων που συμφωνήθηκαν στο πλαίσιο του προγράμματος προσαρμογής για την Ελλάδα στον τομέα των τελωνείων και της διευκόλυνσης των εμπορικών συναλλαγών, καθώς και χρονοδιάγραμμα για την εφαρμογή, διατίθενται στην επικαιροποιημένη τεκμηρίωση του προγράμματος, η οποία περιλαμβάνεται στην έκθεση συμμόρφωσης που δημοσιεύθηκε μετά την ολοκλήρωση της 4ης αναθεώρησης του προγράμματος (12).

Όσον αφορά τη δυνατότητα παροχής στήριξης από την ΕΕ για τις τελωνειακές διαδικασίες, στο έγγραφο θέσης των υπηρεσιών της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής σχετικά με την ανάπτυξη συμφωνίας εταιρικής σχέσης και προγραμμάτων στην Ελλάδα (Νοέμβριος 2012) (13) επισημαίνεται η ανάγκη εκσυγχρονισμού και αποτελεσματικής λειτουργίας της ελληνικής τελωνειακής διοίκησης. Για τον σκοπό αυτόν, μπορεί να παρασχεθεί στήριξη από τα Ευρωπαϊκά Διαρθρωτικά και Επενδυτικά Ταμεία (ΕΔΕΤ) για τις διαδικασίες που αφορούν τα τελωνεία. Όπως και κάθε άλλη διαδικασία, ωστόσο, οι διαδικασίες αυτές θα πρέπει να αποτελούν μέρος στρατηγικής και να εμπίπτουν στο πεδίο εφαρμογής ενός θεματικού στόχου και μιας από τις επενδυτικές προτεραιότητες συγκεκριμένου προγράμματος.

Η Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή παρέχει ήδη τεχνική βοήθεια (π.χ. υποστήριξη από εμπειρογνώμονες άλλων κρατών μελών και από αποστολές εμπειρογνωμόνων της ΓΔ TAXUD, επιμορφωτικά σεμινάρια) στον τομέα των τελωνείων και της φορολογίας, μέσω των προγραμμάτων Τελωνεία 2020 και Fiscalis 2020. Στο πλαίσιο και των δύο προγραμμάτων, έχουν εκπονηθεί ειδικά σχέδια για την Ελλάδα, που μπορούν να χρησιμοποιηθούν για τη στήριξη της υλοποίησης των μεταρρυθμίσεων στον τομέα των τελωνείων ή της φορολογίας (συμπεριλαμβανομένης της εφαρμογής των ηλεκτρονικών τελωνείων). Ο οικονομικός αντίκτυπος αυτών των σχεδίων θα εξαρτηθεί από τις ανάγκες που θα εντοπιστούν από την αρμόδια ομάδα εργασίας για την ελληνική τελωνειακή μεταρρύθμιση, η οποία αποτελείται από εκπροσώπους της ελληνικής τελωνειακής διοίκησης, από τον έλληνα Γενικό Γραμματέα Δημοσίων Εσόδων και από την Ομάδα Δράσης για την Ελλάδα.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-003960/14

to the Commission

Nikolaos Chountis (GUE/NGL)

(31 March 2014)

Subject: Control of Greek customs operations

It has been reported that one of the outstanding issues in the negotiations between the Greek Government and the Troika (the Commission, the IMF and the ECB) is ‘control of Greek customs and electronic monitoring applications in respect of the movement of goods and clearance payments for goods aimed at curbing tax evasion, corruption and smuggling.’

In view of the above, will the Commission say:

Answer given by Mr Kallas on behalf of the Commission

(9 July 2014)

A detailed account of the progress made and the next steps agreed in the framework of the adjustment programme for Greece in the field of customs and trade facilitation, including a timetable for implementation, is available in the updated programme documentation contained in the compliance report published following the conclusion of the 4th review of the programme.  (14)

As regards the possibility of EU support of operations relating to customs, the Position Paper of the European Commission services on the development of Partnership Agreement and programmes in Greece (November 2012) (15) identifies the need for modernisation and efficient operation of the Greek customs administration. To this end, operations relating to customs can be supported by the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF). As any other operation, however, they must be part of a strategy and fall within scope of a thematic objective and of one of the investment priorities of a given programme.

The European Commission is already providing technical assistance (e.g. support from experts from other MS and DG TAXUD expert missions, training seminars) in the field of customs and taxation through the Customs 2020 and Fiscalis 2020 programmes. Under both programmes, specific projects for Greece have been created that can be used to support the implementation of reforms in the area of customs or taxation (including the application of electronic customs). The financial impact of these projects will be dependent on the needs to be identified by the working group competent for the Greek Customs Reform, which consists of representatives from the Greek Customs Administration, from the Greek Secretary General for Public Revenue and from the Task Force for Greece.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-003995/14

alla Commissione

Cristiana Muscardini (ECR)

(31 marzo 2014)

Oggetto: Il 2013 orribile dei diritti umani in Cina

Il rapporto stilato da «Chinese Human Rights Defenders» per l'anno 2013 lascia poca speranza per il futuro dei diritti umani in Cina: se da un lato, ad esempio, il governo annunciava l'abolizione dei laogai, i lager per il lavoro forzato, dall'altro aumentava i centro di detenzione illegali e clandestini nelle periferie delle città, a cui destinava i prigionieri. Quasi 250 attivisti per i diritti umani sono stati arrestati e si è triplicato il numero delle migliaia di persone scomparse senza motivo, di cui nessuno sa nulla. Al tempo stesso rimangono elevate, insieme all'aumento del capitalismo di stato, anche le censure alla libertà di espressione, ai blog, ai social network, a internet e alle espressioni culturali non autorizzate dal partito.

La Commissione:

Risposta dell'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente Catherine Ashton a nome della Commissione

(10 luglio 2014)

L'UE segue costantemente la situazione dei diritti umani in Cina, anche attraverso la sua delegazione a Pechino. Nonostante la mancanza di trasparenza del sistema penitenziario, giuridico e di sicurezza, l'UE è consapevole dei diversi problemi incontrati dai difensori dei diritti umani e dai cittadini cinesi che lottano per i loro diritti. La situazione è regolarmente evocata dall'Unione europea nelle dichiarazioni pubbliche e attraverso contatti bilaterali. Attualmente vi sono 58 cittadini dell'UE nelle carceri cinesi e circa 26 in detenzione amministrativa ed extragiudiziale di altro genere.

L'UE non sta negoziando un accordo di libero scambio con la Cina. Al vertice di novembre 2013, l'UE e la Cina hanno avviato i negoziati per un accordo bilaterale sugli investimenti. Finora hanno avuto luogo tre cicli di negoziati.

Il dialogo sui diritti umani è parte integrante dei rapporti dell'UE con la Cina, come confermato dal programma strategico di cooperazione UE-Cina per il 2020, adottato nel 2013 in occasione del vertice UE-Cina e che prevede un approfondimento degli scambi in materia di diritti umani a livello bilaterale e internazionale sulla base della parità e del rispetto reciproco

(English version)

Question for written answer E-003995/14

to the Commission

Cristiana Muscardini (ECR)

(31 March 2014)

Subject: 2013 — annus horribilis for human rights in China

The report drawn up by ‘Chinese Human Rights Defenders’ for 2013 leaves little hope for the future of human rights in China: although the government announced the abolition of ‘laogai’ or forced labour camps, there was an increase in the number of illegal, clandestine detention centres on the outskirts of towns, to which prisoners were being sent. Nearly 250 human rights activists were arrested, and there was a three-fold rise in the thousands of people who disappeared without explanation, whose fate is unknown. Together with the increase in state capitalism, there continues to be heavy censoring of freedom of expression, blogs, social networks, the Internet and forms of cultural expression not authorised by the party.

Can the Commission answer the following questions:

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(10 July 2014)

The EU constantly monitors the human rights situation in China, including through its Delegation in Beijing. Despite of the lack of transparency of the security, legal and penitentiary system, the EU is aware of the many problems faced by human rights defenders and Chinese citizens who are fighting for their rights. The situation is raised regularly by the EU in public statements and through bilateral contacts. There are currently 58 EU nationals in Chinese prisons and around 26 held in administrative and other extra-judicial detention.

The EU is not negotiating a free trade agreement with China. At the November 2013 Summit, the EU and China launched negotiations for a bilateral Investment Agreement. So far, there rounds of negotiations have taken place.

Dialogue on Human Rights is an integral part of the EU's relations with China as confirmed by the EU-China 2020 Strategic Agenda for Cooperation, which was adopted at the 2013 EU-China Summit and foresees a deepening of ‘exchanges on human rights at the bilateral and international level on the basis of equality and mutual respect’.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-004096/14

alla Commissione (Vicepresidente/Alto Rappresentante)

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE) e Oreste Rossi (PPE)

(2 aprile 2014)

Oggetto: VP/HR — Il ruolo diplomatico carente dell'UE nella risoluzione diplomatica della crisi ucraina

Lo scorso 30 marzo si sono incontrati a Parigi il segretario di Stato statunitense e il ministro degli Esteri russo, al fine di cercare un nuovo percorso che potesse disinnescare la crisi ucraina. Il rappresentante di Mosca ha chiesto una nuova costituzione che garantisca un'organizzazione federale dello Stato, proposta già rigettata da Kiev, tanto che lo stesso ministro russo ha confermato che l'incontro è stato infruttuoso. Gli USA invece hanno richiesto che la Russia ritiri le sue truppe dalla frontiera ucraina, il disarmo delle forze irregolari, l'invio di osservatori internazionali per la protezione dei diritti delle minoranze e un dialogo diretto tra Mosca e Kiev.

L'incontro è stato organizzato in poche ore, alla vigilia della riunione dei ministri degli Esteri della NATO di oggi a Bruxelles, che prevedibilmente sarà dominata dalla crisi ucraina, ma l'Unione europea ne è rimasta esclusa, quando invece dovrebbe essere il primo attore internazionale interessato a una risoluzione pacifica della questione nei tempi più brevi e nel pieno rispetto del diritto internazionale. Questa assenza da parte europea non è giustificabile e pertanto si chiede al Vice-presidente/Alto Rappresentante come intenda far valere il peso negoziale europeo di fronte a Mosca sulla questione ucraina, in maniera almeno paritaria rispetto a quella degli Stati Uniti.

Risposta dell'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente Catherine Ashton a nome della Commissione

(11 luglio 2014)

Nel quadro dell'azione internazionale volta a trovare una soluzione pacifica per la situazione in Ucraina, l'UE ha svolto un ruolo di primo piano. Lo scorso 17 aprile l'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente Catherine Ashton ha partecipato, a Ginevra, a un incontro con i rappresentanti dei governi ucraino, statunitense e russo, conclusosi con la dichiarazione comune di Ginevra sull'Ucraina. In quell'occasione l'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente ha esortato tutte le parti a garantire la piena attuazione delle disposizioni previste nella dichiarazione comune, compreso l'invito a usare il proprio potere di leva sui gruppi armati illegali affinché cessino ogni forma di violenza e provocazione e cedano le armi. L'UE sta mettendo in atto rigorose misure restrittive contro coloro che hanno compromesso l'integrità territoriale e la sovranità dell'Ucraina, nonché nei confronti dei responsabili di violazioni dei diritti umani e di assegnazione impropria dei fondi statali in Ucraina. L'UE sta inoltre contribuendo al processo di stabilizzazione del paese e al programma di riforma con una cospicua assistenza finanziaria: il sostegno complessivo dell'UE all'Ucraina, combinando tutte le misure, potrebbe ammontare a 11 miliardi di EUR nei prossimi anni. Il sostegno che l'UE ha fornito, anche attraverso l'OSCE e il Consiglio d'Europa, in occasione delle recenti elezioni presidenziali e che tuttora fornisce per il processo di riforme costituzionali in corso sta aiutando l'Ucraina a creare una società più democratica e inclusiva. L'UE e l'Ucraina si stanno ora preparando a firmare le rimanenti disposizioni dell'accordo di associazione, incluse quelle relative alla zona di libero scambio globale e approfondito. Ciò consentirà di rafforzare ulteriormente e in modo molto concreto le già solide relazioni UE-Ucraina.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004096/14

to the Commission (Vice-President/High Representative)

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE) and Oreste Rossi (PPE)

(2 April 2014)

Subject: VP/HR — The paltry diplomatic role being played by the EU in finding a diplomatic resolution to the crisis in Ukraine

On 30 March, the US Secretary of State John Kerry met Sergey Lavrov, the Russian Foreign Minister, in Paris in a renewed effort to reach some common ground and defuse the ongoing crisis in Ukraine. Mr Lavrov expressed Moscow’s desire for a new federal constitution to be drawn up for the country (a proposal that had already been rejected by Kiev), and afterwards announced that the talks had borne no fruit. Mr Kerry, on the other hand, called on Russia to withdraw its troops from the Ukrainian borders and establish a direct dialogue with the Ukrainian Government, and also for all irregular forces to be disarmed and a team of international observers to be sent to the country in order to protect the rights of minority populations.

The talks, which lasted for a few hours, were held on the eve of today’s meeting in Brussels between NATO Foreign Ministers, which is expected to be dominated by the Ukrainian crisis. However, the European Union will not be represented at this meeting, even though it should be the principal international actor involved in bringing the crisis to a peaceful resolution as quickly as possible, and in full compliance with international law. The EU’s continued absence from the negotiations is simply unjustifiable. Consequently, could the High Representative/Vice-President please indicate how she intends to make the EU more involved in the talks with Moscow over the Ukrainian crisis, so that it plays at least as important a role as the United States?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(11 July 2014)

The EU has been at the forefront of international efforts to find a peaceful solution to the situation in Ukraine. High Representative/Vice-President Ashton participated along with the governments of Ukraine, the United States and the Russian Federation in 17 April 2014 discussions leading to the Geneva Joint Statement on Ukraine. In Geneva, the HRVP called on all parties to ensure that the terms of the Geneva Joint Statement were fully implemented, including by using their leverage on illegal armed groups to stop violence and provocation and to make them hand in their arms. The EU is pursuing robust restrictive measures against those who have undermined Ukraine's territorial integrity and sovereignty, as well as against those responsible for human rights violations and misallocation of State funds in Ukraine. It is also providing important assistance to help stabilise the country as well as support the reform programme; EU measures combined could bring overall support of at least EUR 11 billion over the coming years. EU support including through the OSCE and Council of Europe for recent Presidential elections and the on-going constitutional reform process is helping Ukrainians create a more democratic and inclusive society. The EU and Ukraine are now preparing to sign remaining provisions of the Association Agreement, including the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area. This will further cement the EU's and Ukraine's already strong relationship in a very tangible way.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-004101/14

alla Commissione (Vicepresidente/Alto Rappresentante)

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE) e Oreste Rossi (PPE)

(2 aprile 2014)

Oggetto: VP/HR — Nuove manifestazioni e rischio di smembramento dell'Ucraina

Fonti governative ucraine sostengono che la rivolta filo-russa in Ucraina stia dilagando nell'est e nel sud del paese e che la capitale economica del paese, Donetsk, e Odessa siano due centri particolarmente a rischio. Nella prima di tali città, migliaia di sostenitori del Cremlino sono scesi in piazza per protestare contro la nomina a governatore di un oligarca scelto dal governo di Kiev, fino all'occupazione di alcuni piani della sede del governo regionale da parte di alcune centinaia di manifestanti. A Odessa, invece, centinaia di persone sono scese in piazza in favore del nuovo governo ucraino, mentre, paradossalmente, sul palazzo del Consiglio regionale di Odessa sventola la bandiera russa, issata da circa 700 manifestanti pro-Mosca che hanno fatto irruzione nell'edificio.

Mentre queste manifestazioni fanno aumentare la tensione nel paese, le guardie di frontiera ucraine hanno informato dell'atterraggio di dieci elicotteri da combattimento e otto aerei da trasporto russi, senza che Kiev fosse informata con 72 ore di anticipo, come previsto dall'accordo bilaterale sulla flotta russa del Mar Nero di stanza a Sebastopoli. Si parla adesso di circa 16mila militari russi nella penisola.

In merito all'aumento della tensione in diversi centri urbani ucraini, può il Vicepresidente/Alto Rappresentante chiarire quale strategia intenda adottare, alla luce degli scarsi risultati finora raggiunti?

Risposta dell'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente Catherine Ashton a nome della Commissione

(11 luglio 2014)

Da quando è stata presentata l'interrogazione si sono verificati notevoli sviluppi e la situazione cambia di giorno in giorno.

Come indicato nella dichiarazione rilasciata il 27 maggio dai capi di Stato e di governo, l'UE aderisce pienamente alla dichiarazione comune di Ginevra del 17 aprile ed elogia il ruolo svolto dalla missione speciale di monitoraggio dell'OSCE nel contribuire alla sua attuazione, come pure gli sforzi compiuti finora dalle autorità ucraine per attuarla

(http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/142863.pdf).

L'UE esorta nuovamente la Federazione russa a prendere provvedimenti per attuare integralmente la dichiarazione. Gli sforzi compiuti da tutte le parti dovrebbero mirare a risolvere la crisi sul piano politico ponendo fine, in particolare, alle violenze e alle tensioni nell'Ucraina orientale, come anche prevedendo il disarmo di tutti i gruppi armati illegali e l'amnistia per coloro che hanno deposto volontariamente le armi e che non hanno commesso reati gravi.

L'UE continua a prestare assistenza per contribuire a stabilizzare la situazione macroeconomica e a condurre riforme strutturali nel paese. A marzo la Commissione ha proposto un pacchetto finanziario di 11 miliardi di EUR, dopo di che ha creato un apposito gruppo di sostegno per aiutare le autorità ucraine ad attuare un programma europeo di riforma elaborato di comune accordo. Sono state poste in atto diverse misure, tra cui la prima erogazione dell'assistenza macrofinanziaria, per un totale a oggi di 1,61 miliardi di EUR, e la firma di un contratto di potenziamento istituzionale tra la Commissione europea e il governo dell'Ucraina. Maggiori particolari sul sostegno dell'UE, comprese le misure commerciali autonome, sono disponibili al seguente indirizzo: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-14-279_en.htm.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004101/14

to the Commission (Vice-President/High Representative)

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE) and Oreste Rossi (PPE)

(2 April 2014)

Subject: VP/HR — Fresh demonstrations in Ukraine, and risk of the country breaking up

Sources in the Ukrainian Government suggest that the pro-Russian uprising in Ukraine is growing more widespread in eastern and southern parts of the country, and that the two cities of Donetsk (the economic hub of the region) and Odessa are particularly at risk. In Donetsk, thousands of pro-Russian demonstrators have taken to the streets to protest against the Ukrainian Government’s decision to appoint an oligarch as regional governor, with several hundred going as far as occupying several floors of the regional government building. In Odessa, meanwhile, even though hundreds of people have marched in support of the newly formed Ukrainian Government, the Russian flag can be seen flying over the city’s council headquarters, after being raised by around 700 pro-Russian supporters who had stormed the building.

In addition to these demonstrations, which are making the situation in the country even more tense, the Ukrainian border police have also reported that ten Russian attack helicopters and eight Russian transport aeroplanes have touched down in Ukraine without Kiev having been given 72 hours’ advance notice, as is expressly stipulated in the bilateral agreement concerning Russia’s Black Sea Fleet stationed in Sevastopol. Around 16 000 Russian troops are now thought to be in the peninsula.

In light of the heightened levels of tension in various Ukrainian cities, can the High Representative/Vice-President indicate what strategy she intends to adopt, especially in view of the insufficient progress that has so far been made?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(11 July 2014)

Events have evolved considerably since the question was asked, and the situation changes daily.

As noted in the 27 May Heads of State and Government statement, the EU is fully committed to the 17 April Geneva Joint Statement and commends the role of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission in assisting in its implementation, as well as the efforts undertaken so far by the Ukrainian authorities to implement it (http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/142863.pdf).

We reiterate our call on the Russian Federation to take actions to fully implement the statement. The efforts by all sides should aim at solving the crisis politically, putting an end to violence and tensions in Eastern Ukraine, including disarmament of all illegal armed groups and amnesty to those who have rendered their arms voluntarily and have not committed serious crimes.

We continue to lend assistance to help stabilise the macroeconomic situation and conduct structural reforms. In March, the Commission put forward an EUR 11 billion financial package. Subsequently, it has created a dedicated Support Group to help authorities implement a jointly agreed European Agenda for Reform. Measures have been deployed, including the first disbursement of macro-financial assistance totalling now 1.61 billion euro and the signature of a State Building contract between the European Commission and the government of Ukraine. More details of EU support, including on autonomous trade measures can be found in the link: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-14-279_en.htm

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-004167/14

alla Commissione

Cristiana Muscardini (ECR)

(3 aprile 2014)

Oggetto: Violenza sui migranti in Spagna

La tensione nell'enclave spagnola di Ceuta, sulle coste del Marocco, è sempre altissima. In una mattinata di febbraio alcuni migranti hanno preso d'assalto la frontiera con la Spagna. La polizia spagnola ha respinto l'attacco con una carica, e i migranti si sono spostati sulla riva. Secondo le ricostruzioni la polizia ha iniziato a sparare proiettili di gomma, costringendo molte persone a buttarsi in mare. Alla fine degli scontri i sommozzatori hanno ripescato 14 corpi senza vita, affogati. In alcuni video si vedono i poliziotti sparare i proiettili di gomma a migranti in difficoltà, mentre quelli che riuscivano a raggiungere la riva spagnola — dove avrebbero dovuto essere accolti in centri specializzati — sono stati riconsegnati immediatamente alle autorità marocchine. Non è giunto alcun commento, che ci risulti, dal Commissario Malmström e dall'Unione europea nei confronti della Spagna.

Alla luce di quanto precede, può la Commissione rispondere ai seguenti quesiti:

Risposta di Cecilia Malmström a nome della Commissione

(16 luglio 2014)

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004167/14

to the Commission

Cristiana Muscardini (ECR)

(3 April 2014)

Subject: Violence against migrants in Spain

Tensions in the Spanish enclave of Ceuta on the Moroccan coast are always very high. One morning in February a number of migrants stormed the Spanish border. The Spanish police charged and repelled the attack, and the migrants moved down to the beach. According to reconstructions, the police began firing rubber bullets, forcing many people into the sea. After the clashes divers recovered the bodies of 14 migrants who had drowned. Videos show the police firing rubber bullets at migrants in difficulties, while those who managed to reach the Spanish beach — from where they should have been taken to special centres — were immediately sent back to the Moroccan authorities. Commissioner Malmström and the European Union have apparently not made any comment to Spain about these events.

In view of the above, can the Commission please answer the following questions?

Answer given by Ms Malmström on behalf of the Commission

(16 July 2014)

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-004223/14

lill-Kummissjoni

Claudette Abela Baldacchino (S&D)

(4 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: Suldati tfal

Fil-kunflitti, it-tfal jiġu separati mill-familji tagħhom, reklutati bħala suldati, sfurzati joqtlu u soġġetti għal sfruttament sesswali fost l-oħrajn. Dan għandu effetti devastanti dejjiema fuq l-iżvilupp fiżiku u mentali tagħhom.

L-għadd stmat ta’ tfal involuti f’kunflitti armati fil-preżent ivarja bejn 250 000 u 800 000.

Hu stmat li sa mill-1996, 6 miljun tifel u tifla ndarbu f’kunflitti armati, waqt li madwar 2 miljuni nqatlu. Madwar 20 miljun tifel u tifla ġew spostati minħabba kunflitti armati jew ksur prolongat tad-drittijiet tal-bniedem.

Bejn 8 000 u 10 000 tifel u tifla nqatlu jew sofrew mankamenti bil-mini tal-art kull sena. It-tfal sikwit huma dawk li l-aktar jintlaqtu mill-kunflitti armati u huma f’riskju akbar ta’ ksur multiplu u ripetut tad-drittijiet tal-bniedem l-aktar fundamentali tagħhom.

Fid-dawl ta' dan kollu, kif qed tippjana l-Kummissjoni li tressaq aġenda ta' politika dwar it-tfal li lill-UE tagħmilha attur globali fir-rigward tal-protezzjoni tat-tfal?

Tweġiba mogħtija mir-Rappreżentant Għoli/il-Viċi President Ashton f'isem il-Kummissjoni

(8 ta' Lulju 2014)

Il-promozzjoni u l-protezzjoni tad-drittijiet tat-tfal hija kwistjoni ta’ prijorità għall-UE. Għalhekk, l-UE tistinka biex issaħħaħ il-protezzjoni, u tippromwovi d-drittijiet inerenti tagħhom.

Filwaqt li l-UE tirrikonoxxi li atturi mhux Statali jirrappreżentaw il-maġġoranza assoluta ta’ vjolazzjonijiet serji kontra t-tfal, hija temmen bil-qawwa kollha li l-Istati għandhom ir-responsabbiltà primarja għall-protezzjoni tal-popolazzjoni tagħhom, inklużi t-tfal, minn abbużi u vjolazzjonijiet tad-drittijiet tal-bniedem.

Għal din ir-raġuni, l-UE ilha tillobbja ma' tmien Stati li għadhom jużaw jew jirreklutaw tfal waqt il-kunflitti armati biex jissieħbu fil-kampanja “Tfal, Mhux Suldati” li tvarat mir-Rappreżentant Speċjali tan-NU L. Zerrougui fis-6 ta’ Marzu 2014, u biex jiffirmaw u jimplimentaw b’mod sħiħ il-Pjanijiet ta’ Azzjoni man-Nazzjonijiet Uniti f’dan il-qasam, sal-2016. L-UE hija wkoll lesta li tappoġġja d-demobilizzazzjoni u r-reintegrazzjoni ta’ tfal marbuta ma’ gruppi armati fil-kuntest ta' proċessi tal-paċi jekk dawk il-gruppi jiffirmaw u jibdew jimplimentaw il-Pjanijiet ta’ Azzjoni.

L-Unjoni Ewropea għandha politika soda, permezz tal-Linji Gwida tal-Unjoni Ewropea dwar it-tfal u l-kunflitti armati. Din il-politika ġiet ukoll sottostanzjata b’għajnuna għall-iżvilupp u għajnuna umanitarja (18) (pereż. iktar minn EUR 300 miljuni intefqu mill-UE u l-Istati Membri tagħha f'assistenza għal tfal affettwati minn konflitti armati fl-2009-2012). Fl-aħħar nett, l-Unjoni Ewropea hija sieħeb rispettat ħafna u mfittex min-Nazzjonijiet Uniti dwar din il-kwistjoni daqshekk delikata.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004223/14

to the Commission

Claudette Abela Baldacchino (S&D)

(4 April 2014)

Subject: Child soldiers

Children in conflicts are separated from their families, recruited as soldiers, forced to kill and subjected to sexual exploitation among other things, which has lifelong devastating effects on their physical and mental development.

The estimated number of children who are involved in armed conflict at present varies widely from 250 000 to 800 000.

It is estimated that, since 1996, 6 million children have been injured in armed conflict, and some 2 million have been killed. Approximately 20 million children have been displaced due to armed conflicts or sustained human rights violations.

Between 8 000 and 10 000 children are killed or maimed by landmines every year. Children often bear the brunt of armed conflict and are at heightened risk of multiple and repeated violations of their most fundamental human rights.

In light of this, how does the Commission plan to put forward a child policy agenda that would make the EU a global player in child protection?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(8 July 2014)

Promotion and protection of the rights of the child is a priority concern for the EU. Therefore, it strives to strengthen their protection and promote their inherent rights.

While the EU recognises that non-State actors account for the overwhelming majority of grave violations against children, it strongly holds that the States have primary responsibility for the protection of their population, including children, from human rights abuses and violations.

For that reason, the EU has been lobbying 8 remaining States that still use or recruit children during armed conflict to join the ‘Children, Not Soldiers’ campaign which was launched by the UN Special Representative L. Zerrougui on 6 March 2014, and to sign and implement fully the action plans with the United Nations in this area by 2016. The EU is also ready to support demobilisation and reintegration of children associated with armed groups in the context of peace-processes if those groups sign and start implement the action plans.

The European Union has a solid policy, through the European Union Guidelines on children and armed conflict. This policy has also been underpinned by development assistance (19) and humanitarian aid (e.g. more than 300 million EUR were spent by the EU and its Member States on assistance to children affected by armed conflict in 2009-2012). Finally the European Union is a longstanding well-respected and sought after partner by the United Nations on this highly delicate issue.

(Version française)

Question avec demande de réponse écrite E-004268/14

à la Commission (Vice-présidente/Haute Représentante)

Isabelle Durant (Verts/ALE)

(7 avril 2014)

Objet: VP/HR — Protocole d'accord UE-Israël

Le 19 juillet 2013, la Commission publiait des lignes directrices excluant la possibilité, pour les entités établies ou actives dans les colonies israéliennes des territoires palestiniens, de percevoir un quelconque soutien financier de la part de l'Union européenne. D'après les informations fournies par la Commission, ces lignes directrices étaient applicables dès janvier 2014. Entre‐temps, la Commission et Israël étaient censés signer un protocole d'accord.

Le texte de ce protocole sur l'association d'Israël au programme Horizon 2020 a été paraphé le 18 décembre 2013.

Dans ce contexte, la Vice-présidente/Haute Représentante peut-elle dire:

Réponse donnée par M. Füle au nom de la Commission

(10 juillet 2014)

Les lignes directrices seront mises en œuvre pour tous les programmes de l'UE à compter du 1er janvier 2014. Le programme-cadre pour la recherche et l'innovation «Horizon 2020» est le premier de la série de programmes de l'UE auxquels Israël sera associé. L'accord d'association d'Israël au programme Horizon 2020 a été paraphé en décembre 2013 et signé le 8 juin 2014. L'accord entrera en vigueur lorsque Israël l'aura ratifié, ce qui devrait être fait dans les semaines à venir. Il s'appliquera rétroactivement avec effet au 1er janvier 2014.

Les premiers appels à propositions pour le programme «Horizon 2020» ont été publiés le 11 décembre 2013. Les premières évaluations auront lieu prochainement et la signature des premières conventions de subvention au titre d'Horizon 2020 est prévue pour fin juillet et pour après l'été. Toute entité sollicitant un financement dans le cadre du programme est tenue de déclarer qu'elle satisfait aux critères d'éligibilité des appels à propositions, en parfaite conformité avec les lignes directrices. La procédure de candidature est conforme à la mise en œuvre des lignes directrices.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004268/14

to the Commission (Vice-President/High Representative)

Isabelle Durant (Verts/ALE)

(7 April 2014)

Subject: VP/HR — Memorandum of understanding between EU and Israel

On 19 July 2013 the Commission published guidelines excluding entities established or active in Israeli settlements in Palestine from receiving financial support from the EU. According to the information given by the Commission, the guidelines were applicable as from January 2014. In the meantime, the Commission and Israel were supposed to sign a memorandum of understanding (MoU).

The text of the MoU on Israel’s association with the Horizon 2020 programme was initialled on 18 December 2013.

In this context, can the Vice-President/High Representative provide the following information:

Answer given by Mr Füle on behalf of the Commission

(10 July 2014)

The Guidelines will be implemented across all EU programmes, starting from 1 January 2014. Horizon 2020, the framework Programme for Research and Innovation, is the first of a number of EU programmes to which Israel will be associated. Israel's agreement of association to Horizon 2020 was initialled in December 2013 and the signature of the agreement took place on 8 June 2014. The agreement will enter into force following Israel’s ratification, which is expected in the coming weeks. It will apply retroactively with effect from 1 January 2014.

The first Calls for Proposals for Horizon 2020 were published on 11 December 2013. The first evaluations will soon take place and the first Grant Agreements from Horizon 2020 are expected for signature in late July and after summer. All entities applying for funding to the programme are requested to declare that they fulfil the eligibility criteria of the calls for proposals which are in full conformity with the Guidelines. The application process is compliant with the implementation of the guidelines.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-004395/14

alla Commissione

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE) e Oreste Rossi (PPE)

(9 aprile 2014)

Oggetto: Dichiarazione unilaterale dell'indipendenza della regione di Donetsk

Un gruppo di filorussi dell'Ucraina orientale, che ieri hanno occupato il palazzo della regione di Donetsk, hanno proclamato la nascita della Repubblica sovrana di Donetsk, annunciando per l'11 maggio un referendum per la possibile annessione alla Russia della regione.

Anche in altre aree la situazione si sta surriscaldando, come ad esempio a Lugansk, dove i dimostranti hanno occupato parte della sede dei servizi segreti e hanno issato la bandiera russa all'esterno dell'edificio e dove otto persone sono già rimaste ferite in seguito agli scontri con le forze dell'ordine. Anche a Kharkiv diverse decine di persone hanno fatto irruzione nella sede del governo regionale e hanno issato bandiere russe alle finestre, ma oggi sono state sgomberate, secondo quanto afferma Kiev.

La situazione di Donetsk potrebbe divenire la seconda tessera a cadere nel pericoloso effetto domino generato dal referendum in Crimea e non è escluso che la tensione in altre città non possa acuirsi ulteriormente.

In merito agli ultimi eventi avvenuti a Donetsk, può la Commissione chiarire se:

Risposta dell'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente Catherine Ashton a nome della Commissione

(11 luglio 2014)

La Commissione e il Servizio europeo per l’azione esterna seguono con estrema attenzione l'evolversi della situazione in Ucraina e hanno espresso preoccupazione per i continui tentativi da parte dei separatisti filorussi di destabilizzare l’Ucraina orientale e meridionale. Come evidenziato nelle conclusioni del Consiglio Affari esteri del 12 maggio 2014, i continui atti di sequestro degli edifici pubblici, di rapimento, assassinio e violazione della libertà dei media da parte di gruppi armati illegali sono inaccettabili e devono cessare. L’UE ha anche chiarito che non intende riconoscere i referendum illegittimi e illeciti dell'11 maggio 2014.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004395/14

to the Commission

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE) and Oreste Rossi (PPE)

(9 April 2014)

Subject: Unilateral declaration of independence in the Donetsk region

A pro-Russian group in eastern Ukraine, which yesterday occupied the regional government building in Donetsk, has proclaimed the birth of the sovereign Republic of Donetsk, announcing an 11 May referendum on possible annexation of the region by Russia.

In other areas, too, the situation is coming to a head, such as in Lugansk, where protesters have occupied part of the headquarters of the secret services and hoisted the Russian flag outside the building and where eight people were wounded following clashes with the police. In Kharkiv too, several dozen people have broken into the headquarters of the regional government and hoisted the Russian flag at the windows, but they have now been cleared out, according to Kiev.

The situation in Donetsk could yet become the next tile to fall in the dangerous domino effect generated by the referendum in Crimea and the tension could continue to grow in other cities.

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(11 July 2014)

The Commission and the European External Action Service are following closely the evolving situation in Ukraine and are alarmed by the continued efforts by pro-Russian separatists to destabilise Eastern and Southern Ukraine. As made clear in the 12 May 2014 conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council, the continued seizure of public buildings, kidnappings, killings and violation of media freedom by illegal armed groups is unacceptable and must stop. The EU has also made clear that it will not recognise the illegitimate and illegal ‘referenda’ on 11 May 2014.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-004398/14

alla Commissione

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE) e Oreste Rossi (PPE)

(9 aprile 2014)

Oggetto: Morte di un cittadino europeo a Homs

A Homs, in Siria, è morto l'unico europeo rimasto nella città, un anziano prete gesuita olandese. A darne notizia sono diverse fonti dell'attivismo non violento, anche se la notizia non è stata ufficialmente confermata. Dalle prime ricostruzioni, l'uomo sarebbe stato colpito da un proiettile, non si sa ancora se vagante o se per un attacco deliberato.

L'uomo si è impegnato per tutto il corso della guerra affinché i civili fossero fatti evacuare dalla città, dove soffrono per la fame e la scarsa igiene, arrivando anche a pubblicare un appello video su un noto social network.

In merito a questa notizia, può la Commissione chiarire se dispone di maggiori informazioni che possano confermarla e dare eventualmente ulteriori chiarimenti in merito alla dinamica dell'accaduto?

Risposta dell'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente Catherine Ashton a nome della Commissione

(10 luglio 2014)

L'8 aprile 2014 il servizio del portavoce dell'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente ha emesso un comunicato che condanna l'assassinio del prete gesuita Frans Van der Lugt a Homs. http://www.eeas.europa.eu/statements/docs/2014/140408_07_en.pdf

L'Unione europea non è in grado di fornire ulteriori chiarimenti sulle circostanze della morte di padre Van der Lugt.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004398/14

to the Commission

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE) and Oreste Rossi (PPE)

(9 April 2014)

Subject: Death of a European citizen in Homs

The last European left in Homs, Syria, an elderly Jesuit priest from the Netherlands, has died. The sources of the news were various non‐violent activist groups, although there has not yet been any official confirmation. According to initial reports, the man was hit by a projectile, but it is not yet known whether it was stray or a deliberate attack.

Throughout the war, this man had taken it upon himself to evacuate civilians, suffering from hunger and poor hygiene, from the city. He even managed to make a video appeal on a well-known social network.

In the light of this, can the Commission say whether it has further information to confirm the news and possibly provide additional clarification as to the actual circumstances?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(10 July 2014)

On 8 April 2014 the Spokesperson of the HR/VP issued a statement condemning the assassination of Father Frans Van der Lugt, SJ in Homs. http://www.eeas.europa.eu/statements/docs/2014/140408_07_en.pdf

The EU is not in a position to provide further clarifications concerning the circumstances of his death.

(Versiunea în limba română)

Întrebarea cu solicitare de răspuns scris E-004454/14

adresată Comisiei

Elena Băsescu (PPE)

(10 aprilie 2014)

Subiect: Grup de sprijin pentru Ucraina

Comisia Europeană a anunțat crearea unui „Grup de sprijin” pentru Ucraina. Acest organism ar urma să colaboreze cu autoritățile ucrainene în vederea stabilizării situației economice și politice interne, precum și în vederea demarării unor reforme naționale.

Intenționează Comisia să includă în acest format și alte țări din vecinătatea estică, precum Georgia sau Republica Moldova? În ce măsură un asemenea format de colaborare ar putea funcționa ca un catalizator pentru reformele din Ucraina sau din alte state vizate?

Răspuns dat de dl Füle în numele Comisiei

(16 iunie 2014)

La 5 martie, Comisia a convenit asupra unei serii de măsuri concrete, pe termen scurt și mediu, pentru a contribui la stabilizarea situației economice și financiare din Ucraina, a susține procesul de tranziție, a încuraja reformele politice și economice și a sprijini o dezvoltare favorabilă incluziunii în beneficiul tuturor cetățenilor ucraineni.

În urma discuțiilor cu autoritățile ucrainene, a fost stabilită o „agendă europeană de reformă” pentru a corela acțiunile de sprijin pe termen scurt și mediu ale UE cu nevoile Ucrainei. Prin urmare, la 9 aprilie, Comisia a hotărât să creeze un grup de sprijin pentru Ucraina care să reprezinte un punct focal, să asigure o structură și o imagine de ansamblu și să furnizeze orientări pentru activitatea Comisiei în sprijinul Ucrainei.

Această decizie a confirmat hotărârea clară a Comisiei de a sprijini guvernul Ucrainei să își atingă potențialul maxim în cel mai scurt timp posibil și de a asista Ucraina în eforturile sale de a-și construi o economie sustenabilă, cât mai curând posibil.

În această etapă, grupul de sprijin se va concentra în special pe Ucraina. Cu toate acestea, astfel cum se menționează în decizia Președintelui din 9 aprilie, dacă este cazul, activitatea grupului de sprijin ar putea fi extinsă pentru a include Georgia și Moldova.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004454/14

to the Commission

Elena Băsescu (PPE)

(10 April 2014)

Subject: Ukraine support group

The Commission has announced its intention of creating a ‘support group’ for Ukraine with the task of cooperating with the Ukrainian authorities in stabilising the internal economic and political situation and launching a programme of national reforms.

Does the Commission intend to extend these arrangements to other eastern European neighbours such as Georgia or the Republic of Moldova? To what extent could such cooperation act as a catalyst for reforms in Ukraine or other countries involved?

Answer given by Mr Füle on behalf of the Commission

(16 June 2014)

On 5 March, the Commission agreed on a number of concrete measures for the short and medium term to help stabilise the economic and financial situation in Ukraine, assist with the transition, encourage political and economic reforms and support inclusive development for the benefit of all Ukrainians.

Following discussions with the Ukrainian authorities, a ‘European agenda for reform’ has been established to match the EU's short‐ and mid-term support actions with Ukraine’s needs. The Commission therefore decided on 9 April to create a Support Group for Ukraine to provide a focal point, structure, overview and guidance for the Commission's work to support Ukraine.

This decision confirmed the Commission’s clear determination to assist the Government of Ukraine in meeting its full potential as rapidly as possible and to assist Ukraine in its efforts to build a sustainable economy as soon as possible.

At this stage the Support Group will specifically focus on Ukraine. However, as mentioned in the President's decision of 9 April, if necessary the Support Group's work could also be extended to Georgia and Moldova.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004500/14

to the Commission

Diane Dodds (NI)

(10 April 2014)

Subject: Law enforcement

What is the Commission’s view on the ability of Member States to control their own borders and provide for the security of their own people, particularly in relation to law enforcement?

Answer given by Ms Malmström on behalf of the Commission

(10 July 2014)

Today's security challenges are often cross-border and cross-sectoral in nature and no single Member State is able to respond effectively to these threats on its own.

The Commission and the EU agencies such as Europol, Frontex, Cepol and Eurojust assist the Member States in this effort.

This common EU approach is embodied in the EU Internal Security Strategy.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004503/14

to the Commission

Diane Dodds (NI)

(10 April 2014)

Subject: Interreg funding

Can the Commission:

Answer given by Mr Hahn on behalf of the Commission

(17 July 2014)

The programmes for 2007-2013 have not yet been completed. An overall evaluation is not planned, although certain thematic evaluations based on a sample of programmes will be launched.

The allocations for 2014-2020 have not yet been finalised and will be adopted by the Commission shortly.

(Ελληνική έκδοση)

Ερώτηση με αίτημα γραπτής απάντησης E-004515/14

προς την Επιτροπή

Nikolaos Chountis (GUE/NGL)

(11 Απριλίου 2014)

Θέμα: Σύμβαση πώλησης της Ελληνικόν ΑΕ μέσω του ΤΑΙΠΕΔ

Στις 31.3.2014, το ΤΑΙΠΕΔ ανακοίνωσε τον πλειοδότη της απόκτησης του 100% των μετοχών της «ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΑΕ». Επισημαίνουμε τα εξής τρία σημεία: 1) Στη συνολική έκταση των 6 200 000 τμ προβλέπεται η δημιουργία α) περιοχών προς πολεοδόμηση, β) ζωνών ανάπτυξης και γ) μητροπολιτικού πάρκου πρασίνου και αναψυχής. Σύμφωνα με την ανακοίνωση του ΤΑΙΠΕΔ, η οικονομική προσφορά του αναδόχου αφορά μόνο το σημείο (α), δηλαδή την ανάπτυξη των περιοχών προς πολεοδόμηση, παρόλο που στον ανάδοχο του έργου εκχωρείται το σύνολο της έκτασης. 2) Το σχέδιο αυτό «ολοκληρωμένης ανάπτυξης Μητροπολιτικού Πόλου Ελληνικού — Άγιου Κοσμά» υπάγεται στο πλαίσιο της οδηγίας 2001/42/ΕΚ, σύμφωνα με την οποία απαιτείται η σύνταξη Στρατηγικής Μελέτης Περιβαλλοντικών Επιπτώσεων (ΣΜΠΕ) κατά την εκπόνηση του σχεδίου και πριν την έγκρισή του ή την έναρξη της νομοθετικής διαδικασίας. Όμως το Ελληνικό Δημόσιο, με τον Νόμο 4062/2012, ενέκρινε το σχεδιασμό της έκτασης, τις πολεοδομικές ρυθμίσεις, συντελεστές δόμησης κτλ χωρίς την προηγούμενη σύνταξη και έγκριση της ΣΜΠΕ, σύμφωνα με την οδηγία 2001/42/ΕΚ. 3) Σύμφωνα με τη σύμβαση του Αarchus, «στο ενδιαφερόμενο κοινό» πρέπει να δίνεται «το δικαίωμα να διατυπώνει παρατηρήσεις και γνώμες, όταν όλες οι επιλογές είναι ακόμη δυνατές, στην αρμόδια αρχή πριν από τη λήψη της απόφασης για τη συναίνεση ανάπτυξης». Η απαίτηση αυτή καλύπτεται με τη σύνταξη και δημοσιοποίηση της ΣΜΠΕ (Οδηγία 2001/42/ΕΚ) η οποία προηγείται της θέσπισης του σχεδίου. Δεδομένου επίσης ότι, σε παλαιότερη ερώτησή μου (Ε-004347/2011), η Επιτροπή είχε απαντήσει ότι στο πλαίσιο του Κανονισμού(ΕΚ) αριθ. 1080/2006 το έργο «θα μπορούσε, κατ' αρχήν, να είναι επιλέξιμο για συγχρηματοδότηση στο πλαίσιο ενός επιχειρησιακού προγράμματος του ελληνικού εθνικού στρατηγικού πλαισίου αναφοράς της Ελλάδας (ΕΣΠΑ)», ερωτάται η Επιτροπή:

Απάντηση του κ. Potočnik εξ ονόματος της Επιτροπής

(14 Ιουλίου 2014)

Σύμφωνα με την αρχή της επιμερισμένης διαχείρισης, η υλοποίηση της κοινοτικής βοήθειας με τη μορφή εγκεκριμένων επιχειρησιακών προγραμμάτων αποτελεί ευθύνη των κρατών μελών, σύμφωνα με τους εθνικούς στρατηγικούς στόχους και τις προτεραιότητες που έχουν καθοριστεί στον κανονισμό κοινών διατάξεων (ΕΕ) αριθ. 1303/2013 (20). Ένα έργο που εμπίπτει στους στόχους του σχετικού επιχειρησιακού προγράμματος αξιολογείται και επιλέγεται από τις εθνικές αρχές που είναι αρμόδιες για τη συγχρηματοδότηση από τα ευρωπαϊκά διαρθρωτικά και επενδυτικά ταμεία.

Στο εν λόγω πλαίσιο, τα κράτη μέλη δεν είναι υποχρεωμένα να αποστέλλουν στην Επιτροπή πληροφορίες (συμπεριλαμβανομένων των σχεδίων συμβάσεων) σχετικά με θέματα σχεδιασμού και εξέλιξης δημόσιων και ιδιωτικών έργων, εκτός εάν πρόκειται για συγχρηματοδοτούμενα μεγάλα έργα σύμφωνα με τα άρθρα 100 έως 103 του ανωτέρω κανονισμού. Ωστόσο, είναι σαφές ότι, σε κάθε περίπτωση, πρέπει να συμμορφώνονται με τη σχετική νομοθεσία της ΕΕ (όπως με τις οδηγίες 2011/92/ΕΕ (21) και 2001/42/ΕΚ (22)). Τα εθνικά δικαστήρια είναι κατά κύριο λόγο αρμόδια για την εκτίμηση μιας ενδεχόμενης παραβίασης του δικαίου της ΕΕ. Ωστόσο, η Επιτροπή θα διερευνήσει την ύπαρξη σαφών ενδείξεων παραβίασης.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004515/14

to the Commission

Nikolaos Chountis (GUE/NGL)

(11 April 2014)

Subject: Contract for the sale of Hellinikon SA through the HRADF

On 31.3.2014, the HRADF announced the name of the bidder who had acquired 100% of Hellinikon SA shares. We note the following three points: 1) In the total area of 6 200 000 square metres, there are plans to create: a) an urban development project, b) development zones and c) a recreational metropolitan park. According to HRADF’s announcement, the contractor’s financial bid concerns only (a), i.e. the urban development project, even though the whole area is being ceded to that contractor. 2) The ‘Integrated Hellinikon — Agios Kosmas Metropolitan Pole Development Project’ falls under Directive 2001/42/EC, which requires a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) to be drawn up before a project is adopted or the legislative process begins. However, the Greek Government, by adopting Law 4062/2012, has approved the plans for the area, the urban planning arrangements, building codes, etc., without an SEA being drawn up and approved beforehand, as required by Directive 2001/42/EC. 3) Under the Aarhus Convention, interested members of the public must be given the right to voice comments and opinions to the competent authority while all options are still open before the decision authorising the development is taken. This requirement is met by the drawing-up and publication of an SEA (Directive 2001/42/EC) prior to the adoption of a project. Given also that in its answer to a previous question (E-004347/2011), the Commission had stated that under Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 ‘a project for the realisation of a metropolitan park on the Hellinikon site could, in principle, be eligible for co-financing under one of the Operational programmes of the Greek National Strategic Reference Framework’, will the Commission say:

Answer given by Mr Potočnik on behalf of the Commission

(14 July 2014)

In application of the principle of shared management, the implementation of Community assistance, taking the form of agreed operational programmes, is the responsibility of the Member States, in line with the national strategic goals and the priorities set up in the Common Provision Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 (23). A project falling within the objectives of the relevant operational programme is appraised and selected by the competent national authorities for co-funding by the European Structural and Investment Funds.

Against this background, Member States are not obliged to send the Commission information (including draft contracts) on planning and development issues concerning public and private projects, , unless these are co-funded Major Projects according to Articles 100-103 of the aforementioned Regulation. However, it is clear that in all cases the relevant EU legislation (such as Directives 2011/92/EU (24) and 2001/42/EC (25)) has to be respected. The national courts are primarily competent to assess whether there is a breach of EC law. However, the Commission will investigate if there is clear evidence of a breach.

(Versiunea în limba română)

Întrebarea cu solicitare de răspuns scris P-004581/14

adresată Comisiei

Silvia-Adriana Ţicău (S&D)

(11 aprilie 2014)

Subiect: Invalidarea Directivei 2006/24/CE privind păstrarea datelor

Curtea de Justiție a Uniunii Europene a invalidat „Directiva 2006/24/CE privind păstrarea datelor generate sau prelucrate în legătură cu furnizarea serviciilor de comunicații electronice accesibile publicului sau de rețele de comunicații publice și de modificare a Directivei 2002/58/CE” prin decizia din 8 aprilie 2014.

În data de 30 iunie 2011 am adresat Comisiei următoarea întrebare:

„Întreb Comisia dacă are în vedere revizuirea Directivei 2006/24/CE privind păstrarea datelor, astfel încât la nivel european să fie aplicate condiții uniforme pentru păstrarea datelor, care să fie în conformitate atât cu prevederile constituționale ale statelor membre, cât și cu prevederile Cartei drepturilor fundamentale a Uniunii Europene, și care să nu aducă atingere exercitării dreptului la liberă circulație, dreptului la viață intimă, privată și de familie și să nu afecteze secretul corespondenței și libertatea de exprimare?”

În data de 12 august 2011 Comisia a răspuns: „Comisia a luat la cunoștință diferitele puncte de vedere privind posibilele căi de urmat. Comisia va analiza aceste căi de urmat în cadrul unei evaluări a impactului care va preceda o propunere de revizuire. Pe baza acestei evaluări, va fi prezentată o propunere în primăvara anului 2012”.

Până în acest moment Comisia nu a prezentat o propunere de revizuire a acestei directive. Având în vedere noul context în care Curtea de Justiție a UE a invalidat Directiva 2006/24/CE considerând că se produce o imixtiune amplă și deosebit de îngrijorătoare în drepturile fundamentale, în special cele cu privire la protejarea vieții private și la confidențialitatea datelor cu caracter personal, fără ca această imixtiune să se limiteze la ceea ce este strict necesar, aș dori să întreb Comisia ce măsuri are în vedere pentru a stopa rapid efectele negative ale acestei directive?

Răspuns dat de dna Malmström în numele Comisiei

(25 iunie 2014)

Hotărârea Curții Europene de Justiție din 8 aprilie 2014 în cauzele conexate C-293/12 și C‐594/12 a confirmat, în ansamblu, raportul de evaluare al Comisiei din 2011 privind punerea în aplicare a Directivei privind păstrarea datelor (26). În același timp, Curtea a considerat că păstrarea datelor în temeiul directivei astfel cum este formulată nu afectează esența drepturilor fundamentale, servind, în condiții clar stabilite, un interes legitim și general, și anume combaterea formelor grave de criminalitate și a terorismului. Curtea a hotărât în această privință că Directiva privind păstrarea datelor nu îndeplinește principiul proporționalității și că ar fi trebuit să furnizeze mai multe garanții.

Problemele ridicate de Curte sunt foarte complexe și necesită o evaluare atentă a impactului pe care îl pot avea. În cadrul evaluării pe care o va întreprinde, Comisia va consulta toate părțile interesate relevante, astfel încât să țină seama de toate interesele legitime implicate. Comisia intenționează să aloce timpul necesar efectuării acestei evaluări. Pe această bază, Comisia va putea evalua, pe parcursul următoarelor luni, necesitatea unei noi propuneri legislative.

(English version)

Question for written answer P-004581/14

to the Commission

Silvia-Adriana Ţicău (S&D)

(11 April 2014)

Subject: Invalidity of Directive 2006/24/EC on the retention of data

The Court of Justice of the European Union declared Directive 2006/24/EC on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC to be invalid in its judgment of 8 April 2014.

On 30 June 2011, I asked the Commission the following question: ‘Will the Commission consider revising the data protection directive (2006/24/EC) in order to ensure the existence of uniform data protection conditions EU-wide, subject to those conditions being constitutional in the Member States and compatible with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, while also not involving any breach of the rights to freedom of movement, privacy and family life, the secrecy of correspondence and freedom of expression?’

On 12 August 2011, the Commission replied: ‘These consultations have informed the Commission of the various points of view on possible ways forward. The Commission will consider those ways forward as part of an impact assessment preceding a proposal for review. On the basis of this assessment a proposal will be presented in spring 2012.’

The Commission has not yet submitted a proposal for a revision of this directive. Bearing in mind the new situation arising from the Court's decision to declare Directive 2006/24/EC invalid on the grounds that it entails a wide-ranging and particularly serious interference with the fundamental rights to respect for private life and to the protection of personal data, without that interference being limited to what is strictly necessary, what steps is the Commission planning to take in order to put a rapid stop to the negative effects of this directive?

Answer given by Ms Malmström on behalf of the Commission

(25 June 2014)

The ruling of the European Court of Justice of 8 April 2014 on Joined cases C-293/12 and C-594/12 generally confirmed the Commission Evaluation Report of 2011 on the implementation of the Data Retention Directive (27). At the same time, the Court considered that the data retention under the directive as such did not adversely affect the essence of fundamental rights, and it serves, under clear conditions, a legitimate and general interest, namely the fight against serious crime and terrorism. The Court decided in this respect that the Data Retention Directive does not meet the principle of proportionality and should have provided more safeguards.

The issues raised by the Court are very complex and require a careful assessment of their impacts. The Commission will consult in the framework of its assessment all relevant constituencies, and in a manner to take on board all legitimate interests involved. The Commission intends to take the necessary time to undertake this evaluation. On that basis, the Commission will be able to investigate in the coming months whether there is a need for a new legislative proposal.

(Versiunea în limba română)

Întrebarea cu solicitare de răspuns scris E-004614/14

adresată Comisiei

Elena Băsescu (PPE)

(11 aprilie 2014)

Subiect: Medicamente contrafăcute

Se remarcă în continuare tendința efectuării unui număr mare de transporturi de produse despre care se crede că încalcă drepturile de proprietate intelectuală. O mare parte dintre acestea prezintă riscuri grave la adresa sănătății umane. Ultimul exemplu în acest sens este captura-record din portul Le Havre din Normandia, unde vameșii francezi au confiscat un total de 2,4 milioane de medicamente chinezești contrafăcute.

Vestea vine la câteva zile după ce Uniunea Europeană a lansat un proiect prin care va sprijini lupta împotriva producerii de medicamente contrafăcute și a traficului cu astfel de produse în Camerun, Ghana, Iordania, Maroc și Senegal.

Care sunt măsurile pe care le are în vedere Comisia în ceea ce privește importul de produse farmaceutice contrafăcute? Cum intenționează Comisia să sprijine statele membre în detectarea și analizarea unor astfel de produse și, mai ales, cum se poate implica Comisia pentru a crește gradul de sensibilizare cu privire la riscurile legate de aceste produse contrafăcute?

Răspuns dat de dl Šemeta în numele Comisiei

(23 iunie 2014)

Recent, la nivel european s-a luat o serie de măsuri. Regulamentul (UE) nr. 608/2013 (28) stabilește condițiile și procedurile pentru intervenția autorităților vamale în cazul în care mărfuri suspectate de a încălca un drept de proprietate intelectuală (DPI) se află sub supraveghere vamală sau sub control vamal. Planul de acțiune vamală al UE pentru combaterea încălcărilor DPI pentru perioada 2013-2017 (29) solicită echiparea vămilor cu instrumentele necesare pentru abordarea principalelor tendințe în domeniul comerțului internațional cu mărfuri care încalcă drepturile de proprietate intelectuală. În 2013, Consiliul a desemnat de asemenea mărfurile contrafăcute ca fiind o prioritate în cadrul luptei împotriva formelor grave de criminalitate și a criminalității organizate pentru perioada 2014-2017.

În 2014, EFPIA (30) și GIRP (31) au devenit semnatare ale Memorandumului de înțelegere privind vânzarea pe internet a mărfurilor contrafăcute. Acest memorandum de înțelegere, încheiat sub auspiciile Comisiei, reunește titulari de drepturi și platforme pe internet importante din mai multe industrii, în lupta împotriva vânzării online de mărfuri contrafăcute.

În perioada 2012-2014, Observatorul (32) a organizat patru seminare de consolidare a cunoștințelor destinate agenților însărcinați cu aplicarea legii, pe diverse teme, inclusiv criminalitatea în domeniul farmaceutic (33). În 2014, cu sprijinul Comisiei, Observatorul va continua să dezvolte un set cuprinzător de programe de formare pentru autoritățile statelor membre în ceea ce privește asigurarea respectării DPI.

În următorii ani, Directiva privind medicamentele falsificate (34) va introduce măsuri care să permită verificarea autenticității medicamentelor și identificarea comercianților cu amănuntul de medicamente și a farmaciilor online care funcționează legal.

În fine, Comisia contribuie la finanțarea Rețelei europene a laboratoarelor oficiale pentru controlul medicamentelor, care permite statelor membre să testeze calitatea și autenticitatea medicamentelor de pe piața UE independent de producători.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004614/14

to the Commission

Elena Băsescu (PPE)

(11 April 2014)

Subject: Counterfeit medicines

Transport of products that are believed to infringe intellectual property rights continues to be common. A considerable portion of these products poses serious risks to human health. The latest example in this regard is the record seizure at Le Havre harbour in Normandy, where French customs officers confiscated a total amount of 2.4 million Chinese counterfeit medicines.

The news came a few days after the European Union launched a project to support the fight against the manufacture of counterfeit medicines and the trafficking of such products in Cameroon, Ghana, Jordan, Morocco and Senegal.

What measures does the Commission envisage regarding the import of counterfeit pharmaceuticals? How does the Commission intend to support Member States in detecting and analysing such products and, in particular, how can the Commission become involved in raising awareness with respect to the risks related to these counterfeit products?

Answer given by Mr Šemeta on behalf of the Commission

(23 June 2014)

A series of measures were taken recently at European level. Regulation (EU) No 608/2013 (35) sets out the conditions and procedures for action by customs where goods suspected of infringing an intellectual property right are under customs supervision or customs control. The EU Customs Action Plan to combat IPR infringements for the years 2013 to 2017 (36) calls for providing customs with the necessary tools to address major trends in the international trade of goods infringing intellectual property rights. In 2013, the Council also designated counterfeit goods as a priority for the fight against serious and organised crime for 2014-2017.

EFPIA (37) and GIRP (38) became in 2014 signatories of the memorandum of understanding on the Sale of Counterfeit Goods via the Internet. This MoU, concluded under the auspices of the Commission, brings together major Internet platforms and right holders from several industries in the fight against online sale of counterfeit goods.

In 2012 — 2014, the Observatory (39) held four knowledge-building seminars for enforcement officers on various issues, including on pharma crime (40). In 2014, with the support of the Commission, the Observatory will continue to develop a comprehensive set of sectoral IP enforcement training programmes for Member State authorities.

In the next years, the Falsified Medicines Directive (41) will introduce measures allowing the verification of medicine authenticity and the identification of legally operating online pharmacies and retailers of medicines.

Finally, the Commission contributes to funding the European Network of Official Medicine Control Laboratories, which allows Member States to test the quality and authenticity of medicines on the EU market independently from manufacturers.

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-004647/14

lill-Kummissjoni

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(14 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: Livelli ta' konċentrazzjoni tal-ożonu

Skont l-Aġenzija Ewropea għall-Ambjent, il-konċentrazzjonijiet tal-ożonu fil-livell tal-art qabżu l-limiti legali f'kull Stat Membru u f'bosta siti ta' kejl individwali fl-2013.

Il-Kummissjoni tista' tiddikjara kif dawn ir-riżultati jaffettwaw il-pakkett dwar il-Politika għall-Arja Nadifa introdott reċentement, biex jitnaqqsu l-emissjonijiet, inklużi dawk ta' prekursuri tal-ożonu?

Tweġiba mogħtija mis-Sur Potočnik f'isem il-Kummissjoni

(26 ta' Ġunju 2014)

Il-Kummissjoni tikkonferma l-ħtieġa għal azzjoni kkoordinata fil-livell tal-UE biex tindirizza eċċessi persistenti ta’ valuri fil-mira tal-UE għall-ożonu fil-livell tal-art tal-UE stabbiliti fid-Direttiva 2008/50/UE. (42)

Sabiex jintlaħqu l-valuri fil-mira stabbiliti għall-ożonu, l-emissjonijiet tal-komposti organiċi volatili prekursuri (VOC) u l-ossidi tan-nitroġenu (NOx) ikollhom jitnaqqsu fir-reġjun Ewropew kollu, kif ukoll ikollu jkun hemm tnaqqis qawwi ta’ emissjonijiet ta’ metan, prekursur qawwi tal-ożonu fuq skala emisferika li jikkontribwixxi bil-kbir għal livelli ta' bażi dejjem akbar ta' ożonu.

Il-Kummissjoni għalhekk inkludiet fil-Pakkett tal-Politika għall-Arja Nadifa (43) proposta biex tiġi rratifikata l-emenda tal— 2012 għall-Protokoll ta’ Gothenburg skont il-Konvenzjoni LRTAP li se torbot u timpenja lill-Partijiet tal-Konvenzjoni fir-reġjun EECCA. Il-pakkett jinkludi wkoll impenji ġodda għat-tnaqqis tal-emissjonijiet tal-prekursuri tal-ożonu i.e VOC b' 50 %, u NOx b’ 69 %, kif ukoll għall-metan b’ 33 % għall-2030 meta mqabbel mal-2005.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004647/14

to the Commission

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(14 April 2014)

Subject: Ozone concentration levels

Ground-level ozone concentrations exceeded legal limits in every Member State and at many individual measurement sites in 2013, according to the European Environment Agency.

Can the Commission state how these results affect the recently introduced Clean Air Policy package to reduce emissions, including those of ozone precursors?

Answer given by Mr Potočnik on behalf of the Commission

(26 June 2014)

The Commission confirms the need for EU-coordinated action to address the persistent exceedances of EU target values for ground-level ozone set out in Directive 2008/50/EU. (44)

In order to meet the set ozone target values the precursors volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions would have to be reduced in the entire European region, as well as deep emission cuts of methane emissions, a potent ozone precursor on the hemispheric scale largely contributing to increased background levels of ozone.

The Commission therefore included in the Clean Air Policy Package (45) a proposal to ratify the 2012 amendment to the Gothenburg Protocol under the LRTAP Convention which will engage and commit Convention Parties in the EECCA region. The package also includes new emission reduction commitments for the ozone precursors i.e. VOC by 50%, and NOx by 69%, as well as for methane by 33% for 2030 compared to 2005.

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-004684/14

lill-Kummissjoni

Marlene Mizzi (S&D)

(15 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: Politika aktar intelliġenti dwar il-viżi

Il-Kummissjoni tat bidu għal “politika aktar intelliġenti dwar il-viżi”, li definittivament se tgħin lis-settur tat-turiżmu.

Il-Kummissjoni għandha informazzjoni disponibbli dwar l-impatt pożittiv mistenni f'termini ta' ammont ta' turisti u ta' nfiq?

Tweġiba mogħtija mis-Sinjura Malmström f'isem il-Kummissjoni

(10 ta' Lulju 2014)

Il-Kummissjoni vvalutat l-impatti ekonomiċi tal-proposti fil-Pakkett dwar il-Viża riċenti u ssostanzjathom b’fatti u figuri. Studju kkummissjonat mill-Kummissjoni (46) (Studju tal-Impatt Ekonomiku) u r-rapport tal-Valutazzjoni tal-Impatt (47) mal-proposti (ara b’mod partikolari l-Anness VIII) jinkludu stimi rigward vjaġġaturi “addizzjonali” u nfiq relatat mal-faċilitazzjoni proċedurali tal-viża.

L-Istudju tal-Impatt Ekonomiku stima li fl-2012 numru totali ta’ 6.6 miljun vjaġġatur potenzjali mis-sitt swieq fil-mira (48) li eżamina setgħu kienu “mitlufa” minħabba l-proċeduri diffiċli tal-viżi. L-istudju juri wkoll li regoli tal-viża aktar flessibbli u aċċessibbli jistgħu jwasslu għal żieda fil-vjaġġi lejn iż-żona Schengen ta’ bejn 30% u 60% minn dawn is-sitt pajjiżi. Dan jista’ jfisser sa EUR 130 biljun fi nfiq totali dirett fuq ħames snin (fuq l-akkomodazzjoni, l-ikel u x-xorb, it-trasport, divertiment, xiri, eċċ.), li jistgħu jissarrfu f’madwar 1.3 miljun impjieg fit-turiżmu u setturi relatati.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004684/14

to the Commission

Marlene Mizzi (S&D)

(15 April 2014)

Subject: Smarter visa policy

The Commission has launched a ‘smarter visa policy’, which will definitely help the tourist sector.

Does the Commission have information available on the expected positive impact in terms of tourist numbers and spending?

Answer given by Ms Malmström on behalf of the Commission

(10 July 2014)

The Commission assessed the economic impacts of the proposals in the recent Visa Package and substantiated them with facts and figures. A study commissioned by the Commission (49) (Economic Impact Study) and the impact assessment report (50) accompanying the proposals (cf. Annex VIII in particular) contain estimates as regards ‘additional’ travellers and spending related to procedural visa facilitations.

The Economic Impact Study estimated that in 2012 a total number of 6.6 million potential travellers from the six target markets (51) which it examined may have been ‘lost’ due to cumbersome visa procedures. It also showed that more flexible and accessible visa rules could lead to an increase in trips to the Schengen area of between 30% and 60% from these six countries. This could mean up to EUR 130 billion in total direct spending over five years (in accommodation, food and drink, transport, entertainment, shopping, etc.), and could translate into some 1.3 million jobs in tourism and related sectors.

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-004701/14

lill-Kummissjoni

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(15 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: Iċ-ċiberkriminalità u t-tfal

L-internet u t-teknoloġiji onlajn kienu previsti u ddisinjati bħala għodod tal-komunikazzjoni għall-akkademiċi u r-riċerkaturi; madankollu, bħala riżultat tal-aċċess miżjud tagħhom — b'mod partikolari permezz tal-midja soċjali — fid-djar, l-iskejjel, in-negozji u l-amministrazzjonijiet pubbliċi, it-tfal qed isiru aktar u aktar utenti attivi ta' dawn it-teknoloġiji onlajn.

Fid-dawl tal-Konvenzjoni taċ-Ċiberkriminalità tal-Kunsill tal-Ewropa, x'inhi tagħmel il-Kummissjoni biex tarmonizza l-leġiżlazzjoni mal-Istati Membri?

Il-Kummissjoni qiegħda tippjana li żżid is-sensibilizzazzjoni fost iż-żgħażagħ rigward il-valur tal-privatezza?

Hemm xi pjanijiet futuri għall-Kummissjoni biex toħloq aktar programmi simili għal Internet Aktar Sikur għat-Tfal, li jħeġġu l-kooperazzjoni internazzjonali bħala parti integrali mit-trattament taċ-ċiberkriminalità u ż-żieda tas-sensibilizzazzjoni sabiex jiġu protetti t-tfal onlajn?

Tweġiba mogħtija mis-Sinjura Malmström f'isem il-Kummissjoni

(9 ta' Lulju 2014)

Biex tgħin fl-implimentazzjoni tal-Konvenzjoni dwar iċ-Ċiberkriminalità tal-Kunsill tal-Ewropa, il-Kummissjoni pproponiet leġiżlazzjoni li tinkludi bosta mir-regoli sostantivi tagħha, jiġifieri d-Direttiva 2013/40/UE dwar attakki kontra s-sistemi tal-informazzjoni (52) li ġiet adottata mill-Parlament Ewropew u mill-Kunsill f’Awwissu 2013. L-Istati Membri issa għandhom sentejn biex jimplimentaw id-dispożizzjonijiet fil-liġijiet nazzjonali tagħhom. Id-Direttiva tarmonizza l-leġiżlazzjoni kriminali fl-Istati Membri fil-qasam taċ-ċiberkriminalità, inkluż l-aċċess illegali għal sistemi tal-informazzjoni, l-interferenza illegali fis-sistema u d-dejta u l-interċettazzjoni illegali. Barra minn hekk, tippenalizza l-produzzjoni, il-bejgħ, l-akkwist għall-użu, l-importazzjoni u d-distribuzzjoni ta’ għodod użati biex jitwettqu dawn ir-reati, bħal “botnets”, netwerks ta’ kompjuters infettati użati miċ-ċiberkriminali biex jikkommettu attakki.

Barra minn hekk, il-Kummissjoni tippromwovi r-ratifika tal-Konvenzjoni kemm fi ħdan, kif ukoll barra mill-UE, bħal pereżempju fl-Istrateġija tagħha tas-Sigurtà Ċibernetika għall-Unjoni Ewropea 2013 (53).

Il-Programm Internet Iktar Sikur ġie integrat fil-Faċilità Nikkollegaw l-Ewropa fejn qed jitqies bħala “proġett ta’ interess komuni” fis-settur tat-telekomunikazzjonijiet (54). Il-ħolqien ta' sensibilizzazzjoni dwar kwistjonijiet bħall-valur tal-privatezza se jkompli jkun fil-qalba tal-istrateġija tal-protezzjoni u l-abilitazzjoni.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004701/14

to the Commission

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(15 April 2014)

Subject: Cybercrime and children

The Internet and online technologies were envisaged and designed as communication tools for academics and researchers; however, as a result of their increased access — in particular through social media — in homes, schools, businesses and public administrations, children are increasingly becoming active users of these online technologies.

In the light of the Council of Europe Cybercrime Convention, what is the Commission doing to harmonise legislation across the Member States?

Is the Commission planning to raise awareness among young people regarding the value of privacy?

Are there any future plans for the Commission to create further programmes similar to Safer Internet for Children, which encourage international cooperation as an integral part of dealing with cybercrime and raising awareness in order to protect children online?

Answer given by Ms Malmström on behalf of the Commission

(9 July 2014)

To help implement the Council of Europe Cybercrime Convention, the Commission has proposed legislation comprising many of its substantive rules, namely the directive 2013/40/EU on attacks against information systems (55) which was adopted by the European Parliament and the Council in August 2013. Member States now have two years to implement its provisions in their national legislation. The directive harmonises criminal legislation in the Member States in the area of cybercrime, including illegal access to information systems, illegal system and data interference and illegal interception. In addition, it penalises the production, sale, procurement for use, import and distribution of tools used for committing these offences, such as ‘botnets’, networks of infected computers used by cybercriminals to commit attacks.

Furthermore, the Commission promotes ratification of the Convention both within and outside the EU, as for example in its 2013 Cybersecurity Strategy for the European Union. (56)

The Safer Internet programme has been integrated into the Connecting Europe Facility where it is regarded as a ‘project of common interest’ in the telecommunications sector. (57) Raising awareness on issues such as the value of privacy will continue being at the heart of the protection and empowerment strategy.

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-004702/14

lill-Kummissjoni

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(15 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: Ismijiet ta' dominji

Intbagħtu bosta emails minn kumpaniji ta' pajjiżi terzi lil kumpaniji Ewropej fejn intqal li l-użu tal-ismijiet ta' dominji ta' dawn tal-aħħar kien imur kontra l-liġijiet u r-regolamenti tal-pajjiżi terzi.

Il-Kummissjoni għandha informazzjoni dwar kwalunkwe sistema disponibbli biex titratta sitwazzjonijiet simili?

Il-Kummissjoni qed tikkunsidra li tieħu azzjoni biex tipproteġi lil kumpaniji Ewropej kontra l-ksur ta' privattivi/dominju minn kumpaniji ta' pajjiżi terzi?

Il-Kummissjoni għandha informazzjoni dwar jekk Stati Membri oħrajn irrappurtawx sitwazzjonijiet simili għal dawn?

Tweġiba mogħtija mis-Sinjura Kroes f'isem il-Kummissjoni

(9 ta' Lulju 2014)

Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea ma tafx bil-messaġġi mingħand kumpaniji ta’ pajjiżi terzi lill-kumpaniji Ewropej imsemmija. Fil-każ li jqum tali tilwim, l-ewwel nett għandu jkun kwistjoni għall-kumpaniji nnifishom, u preżumibbilment jista’ jitressaq quddiem il-Qorti fil-każ li xi waħda mill-partijiet tħoss li qed isir ksur ta’ kwalunkwe liġi applikabbli.

B’mod ġenerali, l-użu abbużiv tal-ismijiet tad-dominju jista’ jammonta għal ksur tad-drittijiet tal-proprjetà intellettwali bħal marki kummerċjali jew indikazzjonijiet ġeografiċi, li s-sidien tad-drittijiet Ewropej jistgħu jevitaw abbażi tal-leġiżlazzjoni rilevanti tal-UE u/jew nazzjonali. Madankollu, mingħajr aktar informazzjoni, il-Kummissjoni ma tistax tikkummenta aktar.

Fir-rigward tal-protezzjoni tad-dominju u ta’ ksur li jaffettwa lill-kumpaniji Ewropej, il-Kummissjoni Ewropea u l-Istati Membri tal-UE jagħtu pariri u jinkoraġġixxu lill-Korporazzjoni tal-Internet dwar l-Ismijiet u n-Numri Assenjati (ICANN), u lir-reġistri u r-reġistraturi affiljati tagħha, sabiex jistabbilixxu mekkaniżmi li jevitaw l-użu abbużiv ta’ ismijiet tad-dominju. Dawn jinkludu mekkaniżmi alternattivi ta’ Riżoluzzjoni tat-Tilwim u straġudizzjarji u l-possibbiltà f’ċerti każijiet li d-detenturi tad-drittijiet jitolbu l-ismijiet tad-dominju qabel ma jirrikorru għas-suq ġenerali.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004702/14

to the Commission

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(15 April 2014)

Subject: Domain names

Several e-mails from third-country companies have been sent to European companies stating that their use of domain names is contrary to third-country laws and regulations.

Does the Commission have information on any systems available to deal with these situations?

Is the Commission considering taking action to protect European companies against patent/domain violations by third-country companies?

Does the Commission have information on whether other Member States have reported any similar situations?

Answer given by Ms Kroes on behalf of the Commission

(9 July 2014)

The European Commission is not aware of the messages from third country companies to European companies referred to. If such disputes arise, they would in the first instance be a matter for the companies themselves, and may presumably be brought to court should either party feel that any applicable law is being violated.

In general, abusive use of domain names can amount to violations of IP rights such as trade marks or geographical indications, which European right owners can prevent on the basis of the relevant EU and/or national legislation. Without more detailed information, however, the Commission cannot comment further.

As regards the protection of domain violations affecting the European companies, European Commission and the EU Member States advise and encourage the ‘Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers’ (ICANN), and its affiliated registries and registrars, to put in place mechanisms to prevent the abusive use of domain names. These include extra-judicial alternative Dispute Resolution mechanisms and the possibility in some case for rights holders to claim domain names before they go to the general market.

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-004707/14

lill-Kummissjoni

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(15 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: Il-fondi tal-UE għall-kunsilli lokali

Il-Kummissjoni tista' tagħti informazzjoni dwar il-programmi ta' finanzjament disponibbli għall-kunsilli lokali għall-perjodu ta' programmazzjoni 2104-2020?

Tweġiba mogħtija mis-Sur Hahn f'isem il-Kummissjoni

(4 ta' Lulju 2014)

Kif stipulat fir-Regolament (UE) Nru 1303/2013, li jistabbilixxi dispożizzjonijiet komuni dwar il-Fondi Ewropej Strutturali u ta' Investiment (58), il-Fond Ewropew għall-Iżvilupp Reġjonali, il-Fond Soċjali Ewropew, il-Fond ta’ Koeżjoni, il-Fond Agrikolu Ewropew għall-Iżvilupp Rurali u l-Fond Ewropew Marittimu u tas-Sajd kollha jistgħu jipprovdu sostenn fl-2014-2020 għal proġetti promossi mill-kunsilli lokali fil-qafas ta’ programmi f’livell nazzjonali jew reġjonali. Il-proġetti għandhom jagħtu kontribut lejn il-kontribuzzjoni tal-programmi għall-Istrateġija Ewropa 2020 għal tkabbir intelliġenti, sostenibbli u inklużiv. Attwalment qed issir diskussjoni dwar il-programmi bejn il-Kummissjoni u l-Istati Membri.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004707/14

to the Commission

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(15 April 2014)

Subject: EU funding for local councils

Can the Commission provide information on the funding programmes available for local councils under the 2014-2020 programming period?

Answer given by Mr Hahn on behalf of the Commission

(4 July 2014)

As provided for in Regulation (EU) 1303/2013, laying down common provisions on the European Structural and Investment Funds (59), the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund can all provide support in 2014-2020 to projects promoted by local councils in the framework of programmes at national or regional level. Projects should contribute towards programmes’ contribution to the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. The programmes are currently under discussion between the Commission and the Member States.

(Version française)

Question avec demande de réponse écrite E-004784/14

à la Commission

Gilles Pargneaux (S&D)

(15 avril 2014)

Objet: Cadre législatif pour améliorer la gestion des déchets dans l'Union européenne

L'Union européenne ambitionne de porter le taux de recyclage des déchets à 50 % d'ici 2020.

Malheureusement, le déficit en matière de gestion des déchets montre que dans nombre de régions européennes, l'ensevelissement des déchets et l'incinération sont encore des pratiques majoritaires. Ces dernières provoquent des rejets toxiques, la contamination des nappes phréatiques et de l'atmosphère. Les citoyens et les industries se retrouvent, en outre, à payer des sommes colossales pour un système qui ne fonctionne pas.

La Commission doit prochainement rendre une évaluation sur la législation européenne en matière de gestion des déchets. La Commission peut‐elle indiquer la date de publication de cette évaluation?

L'augmentation des pratiques frauduleuses dans le domaine de la gestion des déchets n'appelle‐t‐elle pas à l'adoption rapide d'un cadre législatif européen stable? Ce dernier n'est‐il pas le seul moyen de garantir une concurrence juste et non faussée, un contrôle efficace et les mêmes règles du jeu pour tous, grâce à une mise en œuvre réelle des mesures, y compris des sanctions?

Réponse commune donnée par M. Potočnik au nom de la Commission

(4 juillet 2014)

La Commission procède actuellement à un réexamen des objectifs contenus dans la législation européenne dans le domaine des déchets. Dans ce contexte, une analyse d'impact a été réalisée et sera publiée dès que la nouvelle proposition aura été adoptée par la Commission.

La révision devrait aboutir à des objectifs à moyen terme clairs et pérennes pour l'UE, afin d'assurer la stabilité du cadre législatif européen. Ces objectifs devraient être alignés sur la hiérarchie des déchets établie par l'UE et sur les objectifs définis dans le 7e programme d'action pour l'environnement, c'est-à-dire la priorité donnée à la prévention des déchets, puis à la réutilisation et au recyclage, et à la limitation de l'incinération aux déchets non recyclables ainsi qu'à la suppression progressive de la mise en décharge. La Commission présentera également dans la proposition envisagée des mesures contribuant à garantir la mise en œuvre complète des objectifs présents et futurs en matière de déchets.

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-004731/14

lill-Kummissjoni

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(15 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: Miri ta' riċiklaġġ

Il-Parlament minn dejjem talab b'mod insistenti biex l-UE tieħu azzjoni aktar stretta biex tnaqqas l-ammont tal-iskart tal-plastik fl-ambjent. L-Ewropa hija t-tieni l-akbar produttur tal-plastik fid-dinja, iżda kwart minnu biss jiġi riċiklat, il-bqija jiġi inċinerat jew jintrema fil-miżbliet jew fl-oċeani. Bħalissa l-Kummissjoni qed tagħmel rieżami tal-politika tagħha dwar l-iskart, jiġifieri d-Direttiva dwar ir-Rimi ta' Skart f’Terraferma, id-Direttiva dwar l-Imballaġġ u d-Direttiva Qafas dwar l-Iskart.

Għal dan l-għan, il-Kummissjoni qiegħda tipprevedi li r-rieżami attwali tal-politika dwar l-iskart se jinkludi miri ta' riċiklaġġ speċifiċi għal kull Stat Membru? Barra minn hekk, x'inhu l-pjan tal-Kummissjoni biex tiżgura li sal-2020 ma jintremix aktar skart żejjed fil-miżbliet, filwaqt li tiskoraġġixxi wkoll l-inċinerazzjoni tal-iskart?

Tweġiba konġunta mogħtija mis-Sur Potočnik f'isem il-Kummissjoni

(4 ta' Lulju 2014)

Il-Kummissjoni bħalissa qed twettaq reviżjoni tal-miri li jinsabu fil-leġiżlazzjoni tal-UE dwar l-iskart. F’dan il-kuntest, tħejjiet valutazzjoni tal-impatt li se tiġi ppubblikata malli l-Kummissjoni tadotta l-proposta ġdida.

Biex tiġi żgurata l-istabbiltà tal-qafas leġiżlattiv Ewropew, ir-reviżjoni għandha tirriżulta f’miri għaż-żmien medju ċari u stabbli għall-UE. Dawn il-miri għandhom ikunu allinjati mal-ġerarkija tal-iskart tal-UE u mal-objettivi definiti fis-seba' Programm ta’ Azzjoni Ambjentali, jiġifieri għandha tingħata prijorità lill-prevenzjoni tal-iskart, l-użu mill-ġdid u r-riċiklaġġ, u l-inċinerazzjoni għandha tkun limitata għal skart mhux riċiklabbli filwaqt li r-rimi fil-miżbliet jiġi eliminat gradwalment. Bħala parti mill-proposta ppjanata tagħha, il-Kummissjoni se tipproponi wkoll miżuri biex jgħinu jiżguraw l-implimentazzjoni sħiħa tal-miri għall-iskart eżistenti u futuri.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004731/14

to the Commission

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(15 April 2014)

Subject: Recycling targets

Parliament has always been vociferous in calling for much tougher action from the EU to reduce the amount of plastic waste in the environment. Europe is the world’s second-biggest producer of plastic, but only a quarter of it is recycled, the rest being incinerated or ending up in landfill sites or the oceans. The Commission is currently reviewing its policy on waste, namely the Landfill Directive, the Packaging Directive and the Waste Framework Directive.

To this end, does the Commission envisage that the current review of waste policy will include specific recycling targets for each Member State? Moreover, what is the Commission’s plan to ensure that by 2020 no more unnecessary waste is sent to landfill sites, while also discouraging the incineration of waste?

Question for written answer E-004784/14

to the Commission

Gilles Pargneaux (S&D)

(15 April 2014)

Subject: Legislative framework for improving waste management in the EU

The EU is aiming to increase the waste recycling rate to 50% by 2020.

Unfortunately, in many parts of Europe most waste is still buried or incinerated. This causes toxic discharges and contamination of groundwater and the atmosphere. Furthermore, individuals and industries are having to pay enormous sums of money for a system which does not work.

The Commission should shortly submit an assessment of European waste management legislation. When will that assessment be published?

Does the Commission not agree that the increase in fraudulent practices in waste management calls for a stable European legislative framework to be adopted without delay? Would that not be the only way of ensuring fair and undistorted competition, effective control and a level playing field for everyone through the proper implementation of the measures adopted, including sanctions?

Joint answer given by Mr Potočnik on behalf of the Commission

(4 July 2014)

The Commission is currently conducting a review of the targets contained in EU waste legislation. In that context, an impact assessment has been prepared and will be published as soon as the new proposal is adopted by the Commission.

To ensure the stability of the European legislative framework, the review should result in clear and stable midterm targets for the EU. These targets should be aligned with the EU waste hierarchy and to the objectives defined in the 7th Environment Action Programme, i.e. giving priority to waste prevention, then re-use and recycling, and limiting incineration to not recyclable waste while progressively phasing out landfilling. As part of its planned proposal, the Commission will also propose measures to help ensure full implementation of existing and future waste targets.

(българска версия)

Въпрос с искане за писмен отговор E-004776/14

до Комисията

Erik Bánki (PPE), Csaba Sógor (PPE), Petru Constantin Luhan (PPE), Teresa Riera Madurell (S&D), Oreste Rossi (PPE), Carl Schlyter (Verts/ALE), Nikos Chrysogelos (Verts/ALE), Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE), Monika Panayotova (PPE) и Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D)

(15 април 2014 г.)

Относно: Възпалително заболяване на червата

Възпалителното заболяване на червата е хронична болест, която засяга от 2,5 до 3 милиона души в Европа (5,5 до 7 милиона в целия свят), като се очаква броят им да продължи да нараства. Възпалителното заболяване на червата може да настъпи на всяка възраст, но често се диагностицира особено сред децата и младежите. Симптомите на болестта включват диария, ректално кървене, спазми, умора, загуба на тегло и, по-специално при децата, забавяне на растежа и на началото на пубертета. Симптомите често водят до хоспитализиране, като при 85 % от болните от възпалително заболяване на червата в Европа се е наложило специално лечение в болница през последните пет години. Освен това възпалителното заболяване на червата може да причини сериозни щети на храносмилателния тракт, като при поне от половината от всички болни се налага хирургична операция.

Въпреки тези тревожни факти равнището на осведоменост относно възпалителното заболяване на червата е доста ниско сред гражданите на ЕС, което допринася за социалната изолация, намаляване на посещаването на училище и намалено участие на пазара на труда сред болните от това заболяване.

Проучването IMPACT от 2010—2011 г. показа, че приблизително 25 % от страдащите от възпалително заболяване на червата в Европа са подложени на някакъв вид дискриминация. Друга тревожна констатация в проучването е равнището на участие на пазара на труда на страдащите от възпалително заболяване на червата, като резултатите показват, че болестта води до чести отсъствия от работа и че 44 % от участниците в него дори са загубили работата си или са били принудени да я напуснат поради заболяването. Освен че представлява проблем за болните от възпалително заболяване на червата и за техните семейства, слабото участие на пазара на труда и високите разходи за лечение също поставят значителна икономическа тежест върху европейското общество като цяло. С проучването, финансирано от Седмата рамкова програма и озаглавено „Естеството на възпалителното заболяване на червата“, беше установено, че общите годишни разходи за възпалителното заболяване на червата надхвърлят 25 милиарда евро само в Европа.

Отговор, даден от г-жа Мойра Гейгън-Куин от името на Комисията

(19 юни 2014 г.)

В рамките на Седмата рамкова програма (7РП) (60) са предвидени над 63 млн. евро за подпомагане на научните изследвания в областта на IBD. Наред с другото проектите са насочени към проучване на ролята на микрочревната флора за развитието на болестта и определяне на терапевтични цели.

Чрез своето обществено предизвикателство „Здравеопазване, демографски промени и благосъстояние“ Рамковата програма на ЕС за научни изследвания и иновации (2014—2020 г.) — „Хоризонт 2020“ (61), ще осигури допълнителни възможности за подпомагане на изследванията в областта на IBD. Информация за съществуващите възможности за финансиране е поместена в портала за участници в областта на научните изследвания и иновациите (62).

По отношение на образованието държавите членки носят пълна отговорност за съдържанието на учебния процес и организацията на образователните системи и тяхното културно и езиково разнообразие, включително за определянето на правила относно задължителното посещение на училище. В някои държави родителите имат право по закон да провеждат домашно обучение. Поради това ЕС не е в състояние да урежда тези въпроси.

(Versión española)

Pregunta con solicitud de respuesta escrita E-004776/14

a la Comisión

Erik Bánki (PPE), Csaba Sógor (PPE), Petru Constantin Luhan (PPE), Teresa Riera Madurell (S&D), Oreste Rossi (PPE), Carl Schlyter (Verts/ALE), Nikos Chrysogelos (Verts/ALE), Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE), Monika Panayotova (PPE) y Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D)

(15 de abril de 2014)

Asunto: Enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal

La enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) es una enfermedad crónica que, en Europa, afecta a entre 2,5 y 3 millones de personas (en todo el mundo, entre 5,5 y 7 millones), y se prevé que la cifra aumente. La EII puede darse a cualquier edad, pero se diagnostica con especial frecuencia en jóvenes adultos y niños. Los síntomas incluyen diarrea, sangrado rectal, calambres, fatiga, pérdida de peso y, en los niños en particular, retraso del crecimiento y del comienzo de la pubertad. A menudo, los síntomas conducen a la hospitalización, y en Europa un 85 % de los pacientes de EII han requerido tratamiento especial en hospital en los últimos cinco años. Además, la EII puede dañar gravemente el tracto intestinal, y como mínimo la mitad de los pacientes requiere cirugía.

A pesar de estos preocupantes datos, entre los ciudadanos de la UE se desconoce bastante la EII. Esto contribuye al aislamiento social, la baja tasa de asistencia escolar y la reducida participación en el mercado laboral de los pacientes de EII.

La encuesta IMPACT de 2010-2011 mostró que en Europa alrededor del 25 % de los pacientes de EII sufren alguna clase de discriminación. Otro hallazgo alarmante de la encuesta es el grado de participación de los pacientes de EII en el mercado laboral: los resultados indican que la EII lleva a una alta tasa de absentismo, y un 44 % de los encuestados incluso han perdido o se han visto forzados a dejar su trabajo a consecuencia de la EII. Además de la inconveniencia para los pacientes de EII y sus familias, la baja participación en el mercado laboral y los altos costes del tratamiento suponen también un considerable coste económico para el conjunto de la sociedad europea. El estudio titulado «IBD Character», financiado por el 7PM, determinó que, solo en Europa, los costes generales de la EII superan los 25 000 millones de euros.

Respuesta de la Sra. Geoghegan-Quinn en nombre de la Comisión

(19 de junio de 2014)

Como parte del Séptimo Programa Marco (66), la Comisión ha dedicado más de 63 millones de EUR a apoyar la investigación en la EII. Los proyectos han estudiado, entre otros temas, la función de la microbiota en el desarrollo de la enfermedad intestinal y la identificación de objetivos terapéuticos.

Horizonte 2020, el Programa Marco de Investigación e Innovación de la UE (2014-2020) (67), ofrecerá nuevas oportunidades para apoyar la investigación sobre la EII a través de su reto social «Salud, cambio demográfico y bienestar». En el Portal del Participante de Investigación e Innovación (68) puede obtenerse información sobre las oportunidades de financiación actuales.

En lo que se refiere a la educación, los Estados miembros tienen plenas competencias en lo que se refiere a los contenidos y a la organización de los sistemas de educación y su diversidad cultural y lingüística, incluida la definición de las normas relativas a la asistencia obligatoria. La educación en el hogar es una opción legal para los padres en algunos países. Por consiguiente, la UE no está en situación de regular estos asuntos.

(Ελληνική έκδοση)

Ερώτηση με αίτημα γραπτής απάντησης E-004776/14

προς την Επιτροπή

Erik Bánki (PPE), Csaba Sógor (PPE), Petru Constantin Luhan (PPE), Teresa Riera Madurell (S&D), Oreste Rossi (PPE), Carl Schlyter (Verts/ALE), Nikos Chrysogelos (Verts/ALE), Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE), Monika Panayotova (PPE) και Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D)

(15 Απριλίου 2014)

Θέμα: Φλεγμονώδης νόσος του εντέρου

Η φλεγμονώδης νόσος του εντέρου (inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)) είναι μια χρόνια ασθένεια που πλήττει από 2,5 έως 3 εκατομμύρια ανθρώπους στην Ευρώπη (5,5 έως 7 εκατομμύρια παγκοσμίως). Οι αριθμοί αυτοί αναμένεται να αυξηθούν περαιτέρω. Η IBD μπορεί να εμφανιστεί σε οποιαδήποτε ηλικία αλλά πλήττει με ιδιαίτερη συχνότητα παιδιά και νεαρούς ενήλικες. Τα συμπτώματα περιλαμβάνουν διάρροια, αιμορραγία από το ορθό, κράμπες, κόπωση, απώλεια βάρους και, ιδίως σε παιδιά, καθυστέρηση ως προς την ανάπτυξη και την έναρξη της εφηβείας. Τα συμπτώματα συχνά καθιστούν αναγκαία την εισαγωγή σε νοσοκομείο. Την τελευταία πενταετία, το 85% όσων πάσχουν από IBD στην Ευρώπη χρειάστηκε ειδική νοσηλεία σε νοσοκομείο. Επιπλέον, η IBD μπορεί να προκαλέσει σοβαρές βλάβες στον πεπτικό σωλήνα. Οι μισοί τουλάχιστον ασθενείς χρειάστηκαν εγχείριση.

Παρά τα ανησυχητικά αυτά στοιχεία, τα επίπεδα γνώσης και ευαισθητοποίησης σχετικά με την IBD παραμένουν χαμηλά μεταξύ των πολιτών της ΕΕ, γεγονός που συμβάλλει στην κοινωνική απομόνωση, στις αυξημένες απουσίες από το σχολείο και στα μειωμένα ποσοστά συμμετοχής στην αγορά εργασίας μεταξύ των ασθενών της IBD.

Η έρευνα για τον αντίκτυπο της IBD που πραγματοποιήθηκε το 2010-2011 έδειξε ότι γύρω στο 25% των πασχόντων στην Ευρώπη αντιμετωπίζουν κάποιας μορφής διάκριση. Ένα άλλο εύρημα της έρευνας που προξενεί ανησυχία αφορά τα ποσοστά συμμετοχής στην αγορά εργασίας των πασχόντων από IBD. Σύμφωνα με τα αποτελέσματα, η νόσος οδηγεί σε υψηλά επίπεδα απουσιών από την εργασία και το 44% όσων συμμετείχαν στην έρευνα είχαν χάσει τη δουλειά τους ή αναγκάστηκαν να παραιτηθούν εξαιτίας της IBD. Πέραν της ταλαιπωρίας των πασχόντων και των οικογενειών τους, η χαμηλή συμμετοχή στην αγορά εργασίας και το υψηλό κόστος της θεραπευτικής αγωγής συνιστούν σημαντική οικονομική επιβάρυνση για ολόκληρο το κοινωνικό σύνολο στην Ευρώπη. Σύμφωνα με την μελέτη «IBD Character», η οποία χρηματοδοτήθηκε από το Έβδομο Πρόγραμμα-Πλαίσιο, το σύνολο των ετήσιων δαπανών που οφείλονται στην IBD υπερέβη τα 25 δισεκατομμύρια ευρώ στην Ευρώπη μόνο.

Απάντηση της κ. Geoghegan-Quinn εξ ονόματος της Επιτροπής

(19 Ιουνίου 2014)

Στο πλαίσιο του ΠΠ7 (72), η Επιτροπή έχει διαθέσει περισσότερα από 63 εκατ. ευρώ για τη στήριξη της έρευνας σχετικά με την IBD. Τα ερευνητικά έργα αφορούσαν, μεταξύ άλλων, τον ρόλο της εντερικής μικροχλωρίδας στην εξέλιξη της ασθένειας και τον προσδιορισμό θεραπευτικών στόχων.

Το «Ορίζων 2020», πρόγραμμα-πλαίσιο της ΕΕ για την έρευνα και την καινοτομία (2014-2020) (73), θα προσφέρει περαιτέρω ευκαιρίες για τη στήριξη της έρευνας σχετικά με την IBD μέσω της κοινωνικής πρόκλησης «Υγεία, δημογραφική αλλαγή και ευημερία». Πληροφορίες σχετικά με τις τρέχουσες ευκαιρίες χρηματοδότησης παρέχονται στην πύλη συμμετεχόντων στην έρευνα και την καινοτομία (74).

Όσον αφορά την εκπαίδευση, τα κράτη μέλη έχουν πλήρη ευθύνη για το περιεχόμενο της διδασκαλίας και την οργάνωση του εκπαιδευτικού συστήματος, καθώς και την πολιτιστική και γλωσσική πολυμορφία τους, συμπεριλαμβανομένου του ορισμού των κανόνων σχετικά με την υποχρεωτική παρουσία. Η κατ' οίκον εκπαίδευση αποτελεί νομική δυνατότητα για τους γονείς σε ορισμένες χώρες. Η ΕΕ δεν είναι, συνεπώς, σε θέση να ρυθμίσει τα ζητήματα αυτά.

(Version française)

Question avec demande de réponse écrite E-004776/14

à la Commission

Erik Bánki (PPE), Csaba Sógor (PPE), Petru Constantin Luhan (PPE), Teresa Riera Madurell (S&D), Oreste Rossi (PPE), Carl Schlyter (Verts/ALE), Nikos Chrysogelos (Verts/ALE), Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE), Monika Panayotova (PPE) et Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D)

(15 avril 2014)

Objet: Maladie inflammatoire de l'intestin

La maladie inflammatoire de l'intestin (MII) est une maladie chronique qui touche plus de 2,5 à 3 millions de personnes en Europe (soit 5,5 à 7 millions de personnes dans le monde), et ces chiffres devraient encore augmenter. La MII peut se déclarer à tout âge, mais elle touche le plus souvent les jeunes adultes et les enfants. Elle se manifeste par une diarrhée, des saignements rectaux, des crampes, de la fatigue, une perte de poids et, en particulier, par un retard de croissance et de puberté chez les enfants. Les symptômes entraînent souvent l'hospitalisation et 85 % des patients européens souffrant de la MII ont eu besoin d'un traitement hospitalier spécifique ces cinq dernières années. En outre, la MII peut gravement endommager le tube digestif, et au moins la moitié des patients doivent subir une intervention chirurgicale.

Malgré ces données alarmantes, les citoyens de l'Union européenne ne connaissent pas vraiment la maladie inflammatoire de l'intestin. Cette méconnaissance contribue à l'isolement social, au recul de la fréquentation scolaire et à la baisse de la participation sur le marché du travail des patients qui en sont atteints.

L'étude IMPACT a démontré qu'environ 25 % des patients atteints de la MII en Europe sont victimes d'une quelconque forme de discrimination. Cette étude révèle une autre donnée alarmante, à savoir le taux de participation sur le marché du travail des patients souffrant de cette maladie: en effet, la MII est à l'origine d'un taux élevé d'absentéisme et 44 % des personnes interrogées ont même été contraintes de démissionner ou ont perdu leur emploi à cause de la maladie. En plus des inconvénients qu'implique la MII pour les patients et leurs familles, la faible participation au marché du travail et le coût élevé des soins représentent un fardeau économique lourd pour l'ensemble de la société européenne. L'étude intitulée «IBD Character», financée par le PC7, a révélé que les coûts annuels totaux engendrés par la MII sont supérieurs à 25 milliards d'euros rien qu'en Europe.

Réponse donnée par Mme Geoghegan-Quinn au nom de la Commission

(19 juin 2014)

Dans le cadre du 7PC (78), la Commission a consacré plus de 63 millions d'euros au soutien de la recherche sur les MII. Les projets concernés ont porté, entre autres problèmes, sur le rôle du microbiote intestinal dans le développement de la maladie et sur l'identification des cibles thérapeutiques.

Horizon 2020, — le Programme-cadre de l'UE pour la recherche et l'innovation (2014-2020) (79), offrira de nouvelles opportunités de soutenir la recherche sur les MII à travers son défi de société «santé, évolution démographique et bien-être». Des informations sur les possibilités de financement peuvent être obtenues sur le portail des participants aux travaux de recherche et d'innovation (80).

En ce qui concerne l'éducation, les États membres sont pleinement responsables du contenu de l'enseignement, de l'organisation et de la diversité culturelle et linguistique des systèmes éducatifs, de même que de la définition de règles sur l'obligation d'assister aux cours. L'enseignement à domicile est, dans certains pays, une option légale pour les parents. L'UE n'est donc pas en mesure de réglementer ces questions.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-004776/14

alla Commissione

Erik Bánki (PPE), Csaba Sógor (PPE), Petru Constantin Luhan (PPE), Teresa Riera Madurell (S&D), Oreste Rossi (PPE), Carl Schlyter (Verts/ALE), Nikos Chrysogelos (Verts/ALE), Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE), Monika Panayotova (PPE) e Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D)

(15 aprile 2014)

Oggetto: Malattia infiammatoria intestinale

La malattia infiammatoria intestinale (Inflammatory bowel disease o IBD) è una malattia cronica che colpisce dai 2,5 milioni ai 3 milioni di persone in Europa (dai 5,5 ai 7 milioni a livello mondiale), e le cifre sono previste al rialzo. L'IBD può manifestarsi a qualsiasi età, anche se viene diagnosticata con particolare frequenza nei bambini e nei giovani adulti. Tra i sintomi figurano diarrea, sanguinamento rettale, crampi, affaticamento, perdita di peso e, con particolare riferimento ai bambini, ritardi nella crescita e nell'inizio della pubertà. Spesso i sintomi conducono al ricovero ospedaliero e negli ultimi cinque anni l'85 % delle persone affette da IBD ha dovuto ricevere cure specialistiche in ospedale. L'IBD può inoltre causare gravi danni al tratto digerente e per almeno la metà delle persone affette è necessario ricorrere all'intervento chirurgico.

Nonostante tali preoccupanti aspetti, tra i cittadini dell'UE è piuttosto basso il livello di sensibilizzazione sull'IBD, la quale contribuisce all'isolamento sociale, a una minore frequenza scolastica e a una ridotta partecipazione al mercato del lavoro da parte delle persone affette.

L'indagine IMPACT del 2010-2011 ha evidenziato che in Europa circa il 25 % delle persone colpite da IBD ha subito forme di discriminazione. Un altro risultato allarmante scaturito dall'indagine riguarda il livello di partecipazione al mercato del lavoro da parte delle persone affette da IBD, infatti stando ai risultati la malattia conduce a elevati livelli di assenteismo e il 44 % dei rispondenti ha persino perso il posto di lavoro o è stato costretto a lasciarlo in conseguenza dell'IBD. Oltre a rappresentare un disagio per le persone affette da IBD e le loro famiglie, la bassa partecipazione al mercato del lavoro e i costi elevati delle cure costituiscono anche un significativo onere economico per l'intera società europea. Secondo lo studio finanziato dal 7° PQ e intitolato «IBD Character», i costi annuali aggregati dell'IBD superano nella sola Europa i 25 milioni di EUR.

Risposta di Máire Geoghegan-Quinn a nome della Commissione

(19 giugno 2014)

Nell’ambito del 7o PQ (84), la Commissione ha destinato oltre 63 milioni di euro alla ricerca sulla IBD. I progetti riguardavano, tra l’altro, il ruolo del microbiota intestinale nello sviluppo della malattia e l’individuazione degli obiettivi terapeutici.

Orizzonte 2020, il programma quadro dell’UE per la ricerca e l’innovazione (2014-2020) (85), offrirà ulteriori opportunità per sostenere la ricerca sull’IBD nell’ambito dell’obiettivo «Salute, cambiamento demografico e benessere», contenuto nella priorità «Sfide per la società». Le informazioni sulle attuali possibilità di finanziamento possono essere ottenute attraverso il portale UE dedicato alla ricerca e all’innovazione (86).

Per quanto riguarda l’istruzione, gli Stati membri hanno piena responsabilità per il contenuto dell’insegnamento, l’organizzazione dei sistemi di istruzione e delle loro diversità culturali e linguistiche, compresa la definizione di regole circa la partecipazione obbligatoria. In alcuni paesi l’istruzione a domicilio è un’opzione giuridica a disposizione dei genitori. L’UE, pertanto, non è in una posizione tale da disciplinare tali questioni.

(Magyar változat)

Írásbeli választ igénylő kérdés E-004776/14

a Bizottság számára

Bánki Erik (PPE), Sógor Csaba (PPE), Petru Constantin Luhan (PPE), Teresa Riera Madurell (S&D), Oreste Rossi (PPE), Carl Schlyter (Verts/ALE), Nikos Chrysogelos (Verts/ALE), Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE), Monika Panayotova (PPE) és Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D)

(2014. április 15.)

Tárgy: Gyulladásos bélbetegség

A gyulladásos bélbetegség (IBD) olyan krónikus betegség, amely Európában több mint 2,5‐3 millió embert érint (világszerte 5,5‐7 millió embert), és ez a szám várhatóan csak növekedni fog. Az IBD bármely életkorban előfordulhat, de gyermekek és fiatal felnőttek körében különösen gyakran diagnosztizálják. Tünetei többek között a hasmenés, végbél vérzés, görcsök, fáradtság, fogyás, és különösen gyermekek körében a növekedés visszamaradása és a késői serdülés. A tünetek gyakran kórházi kezeléshez vezetnek, Európában az IBD-ben szenvedők 85%-a szorult az elmúlt öt év során kórházi szakkezelésre. Ezenfelül az IBD súlyosan károsíthatja az emésztőrendszert, a betegek legalább fele műtétre szorul.

Ezen aggodalomra okot adó tények ellenére az IBD az uniós polgárok körében igen kevéssé ismert, ami hozzájárul az IBD-ben szenvedők szociális elszigetelődéséhez, az iskolalátogatás csökkenéséhez és az alacsonyabb munkaerő-piaci részvételhez.

A 2010–2011. évi IMPACT felmérés kimutatta, hogy Európában az IBD-ben szenvedők 25%-a tapasztal valamilyen fajta hátrányos megkülönböztetést. A felmérés egy másik riasztó eredménye az IBD-ben szenvedők munkaerő-piaci részvételének szintjére vonatkozik, amellyel kapcsolatban az eredmények azt mutatják, hogy a betegség a hiányzások magas szintjéhez vezet, továbbá hogy a válaszadók 44%-a az IBD következtében munkahelyét elvesztette, illetve annak elhagyására kényszerült. Az IBD-ben szenvedők és családjuk számára okozott kényelmetlenségen felül az alacsony munkaerő-piaci részvétel és a magas kezelési költségek az európai társadalom egészére nézve komoly gazdasági terhet jelentenek. A hetedik keretprogram által finanszírozott „IBD Character” című tanulmány szerint az IBD éves összesített költségei csak Európában meghaladják a 25 milliárd eurót.

Máire Geoghegan-Quinn válasza a Bizottság nevében

(2014. június 19.)

A hetedik keretprogram (90) részeként a Bizottság több mint 63 millió eurót fordított az IBD-kutatások támogatására. A projektek többek között a bélflórának a betegség kialakulásában betöltött szerepére, valamint a terápiás célok meghatározására irányultak.

A „Horizont 2020” uniós kutatási és innovációs keretprogram (2014–2020) (91) további lehetőségeket fog biztosítani az IBD-kutatások támogatására az „Egészségügy, demográfiai változások és jólét” elnevezésű társadalmi kihívásán keresztül. A jelenlegi finanszírozási lehetőségekről bővebb információt a kutatási és innovációs programokban részt vevők portálján (92) lehet beszerezni.

Az oktatás tekintetében kizárólag a tagállamok hatáskörébe tartozik az oktatás tartalma, az oktatási rendszerek szervezése, valamint azok kulturális és nyelvi sokszínűsége, ideértve a kötelező részvételre vonatkozó szabályokat. Bizonyos országokban a szülőknek jogilag lehetőségük van az otthoni iskolai oktatást választani. Az EU hatásköre ezért nem terjed ki ezen kérdések szabályozására.

(Nederlandse versie)

Vraag met verzoek om schriftelijk antwoord E-004776/14

aan de Commissie

Erik Bánki (PPE), Csaba Sógor (PPE), Petru Constantin Luhan (PPE), Teresa Riera Madurell (S&D), Oreste Rossi (PPE), Carl Schlyter (Verts/ALE), Nikos Chrysogelos (Verts/ALE), Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE), Monika Panayotova (PPE) en Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D)

(15 april 2014)

Betreft: Chronische darmontsteking (IBD = inflammatory bowel disease)

Chronische darmontsteking is een chronische ziekte waar in Europa 2,5 tot 3 miljoen mensen aan lijden (en in de hele wereld 5,5 tot 7 miljoen mensen), tendens stijgend. De ziekte kan op elke leeftijd de kop opsteken, maar de diagnose wordt vooral vaak gesteld bij kinderen en jongvolwassenen. Tot de symptomen behoren diarree, rectale bloedingen, kramp, vermoeidheid, gewichtsverlies en, met name bij kinderen, groeistoornissen en een vertraagde puberale ontwikkeling. In veel gevallen moeten patiënten met een chronische darmontsteking in het ziekenhuis worden opgenomen (de afgelopen vijf jaar moest 85 % van de patiënten met deze ziekte in Europa voor een specialistische behandeling worden gehospitaliseerd). Chronische darmontsteking kan ook ernstige schade aan het spijsverteringskanaal tot gevolg hebben (meer dan de helft van de patiënten moet worden geopereerd).

Ondanks deze zorgwekkende feiten — en het gegeven dat deze ziekte bijdraagt tot een sociaal isolement, schooluitval en een lagere arbeidsmarktparticipatie — weten de burgers van de EU maar weinig af van chronische darmontsteking.

De enquête IMPACT 2011-2012 heeft aan het licht gebracht dat ongeveer 25 % van alle patiënten met een chronische darmontsteking in Europa met één of andere vorm van discriminatie te maken krijgt. Een andere alarmerende bevinding van de enquête is dat chronische darmontsteking tot een hoog ziekteverzuim leidt en dat 44 % van de respondenten zelfs zijn baan had verloren of had moeten opgeven ten gevolg van de ziekte. Behalve dat de ziekte voor de patiënten en hun familie veel ongemak oplevert, resulteren een lage arbeidsmarktparticipatie en de hoge behandelingskosten ook in een zware financieel-economische last voor de Europese samenleving als zodanig. De door het zevende kaderprogramma gefinancierde studie „IBD Character” heeft berekend dat de jaarlijkse gecumuleerde kosten van chronische darmontsteking alleen in Europa al meer dan 25 miljard EUR bedragen.

Antwoord van mevrouw Geoghegan-Quinn namens de Commissie

(19 juni 2014)

Via Horizon 2020, het EU-kaderprogramma voor onderzoek en ontwikkeling (2014-2020) (97), kan onderzoek naar IBD verder worden ondersteund middels de maatschappelijke uitdaging „gezondheid, demogragische verandering en welzijn”. Informatie over de huidige financieringsmogelijkheden zijn beschikbaar op het Research and Innovation Participant Portal (98).

Wat betreft onderwijs hebben de lidstaten de volledige verantwoordelijkheid voor de inhoud van het lesprogramma en de organisatie van de onderwijssystemen en de culturele en linguïstische diversiteit daarvan, met inbegrip van de regels voor verplichte aanwezigheid. In sommige landen is thuisonderwijs is een wettelijke optie voor ouders. De EU heeft daarom geen wetgevende bevoegdheid op dit vlak.

(Versiunea în limba română)

Întrebarea cu solicitare de răspuns scris E-004776/14

adresată Comisiei

Erik Bánki (PPE), Csaba Sógor (PPE), Petru Constantin Luhan (PPE), Teresa Riera Madurell (S&D), Oreste Rossi (PPE), Carl Schlyter (Verts/ALE), Nikos Chrysogelos (Verts/ALE), Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE), Monika Panayotova (PPE) şi Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D)

(15 aprilie 2014)

Subiect: Boala inflamatorie cronică a intestinului

Boala inflamatorie cronică a intestinului (IBD) este o maladie cronică care afectează 2,5 până la 3 milioane de persoane în Europa (5,5 până la 7 milioane în întreaga lume), tendința anticipată fiind aceea ca numărul acestora să crească. IBD poate să apară la orice vârstă, dar este diagnosticată deosebit de frecvent la copii și adulții tineri. Printre simptome se numără diareea, sângerările rectale, crampele, oboseala, pierderea de greutate și, ca o particularitate la copii, întârzieri în creștere și la instalarea pubertății. Simptomele conduc adesea la spitalizare, 85 % dintre persoanele suferind de IBD din Europa având nevoie de tratament special în spital pe durata ultimilor cinci ani. Mai mult decât atât, IBD poate provoca deteriorarea gravă a tractului digestiv, cel puțin jumătate dintre persoanele afectate necesitând intervenții chirurgicale.

În ciuda acestor fapte îngrijorătoare, nivelul de conștientizare a IBD este destul de redus printre cetățenii UE, ceea ce contribuie la izolarea socială, la un nivel redus de școlarizare și la o participare scăzută la piața muncii printre persoanele suferind de IBD.

Studiul IMPACT 2010-2011 a arătat că aproximativ 25 % dintre persoanele care suferă de IBD din Europa întâmpină o oarecare formă de discriminare. O altă constatare alarmantă a studiului se referă la nivelul de participare la piața muncii a persoanelor suferind de IBD, rezultatele indicând că boala conduce la niveluri ridicate de absenteism și că 44 % dintre respondenți și-au pierdut chiar locul de muncă sau au fost obligați să renunțe la acesta ca urmare a IBD. Pe lângă inconvenientele pe care IBD le induce celor suferinzi și familiilor lor, nivelul redus de participare la piața muncii și costul ridicat al tratamentului constituie, de asemenea, o povară economică semnificativă asupra societății europene în întregul ei. Studiul finanțat de FP7 intitulat „IBD Character” a relevat faptul că costurile agregate aferente IBD depășesc 25 miliarde de euro doar în Europa.

Răspuns dat de dna Geoghegan-Quinn în numele Comisiei

(19 iunie 2014)

În cadrul PC 7 (102), Comisia a consacrat peste 63 milioane EUR pentru sprijinirea cercetării privind IBD. Proiectele au tratat, printre alte probleme, rolul microbiotei intestinale în evoluția bolii și identificarea obiectivelor terapeutice.

„Orizont 2020” — Programul-cadru al UE pentru cercetare și inovare (2014-2020) (103), va oferi noi oportunități pentru sprijinirea cercetării privind IBD prin obiectivul său „Sănătate, schimbări demografice și bunăstare” din cadrul priorității „Provocări societale”. Informații cu privire la posibilitățile de finanțare existente pot fi obținute pe site-ul portalului pentru participanții la programe de cercetare și inovare (104).

În ceea ce privește educația, statele membre sunt pe deplin responsabile de conținutul învățământului și de organizarea sistemului educațional, precum și diversitatea lor culturală și lingvistică, inclusiv definirea normelor privind prezența obligatorie. Școlarizarea la domiciliu este o opțiune legală a părinților în unele țări. UE, prin urmare, nu este în măsură să reglementeze cu privire la aceste aspecte.

(Svensk version)

Frågor för skriftligt besvarande E-004776/14

till kommissionen

Erik Bánki (PPE), Csaba Sógor (PPE), Petru Constantin Luhan (PPE), Teresa Riera Madurell (S&D), Oreste Rossi (PPE), Carl Schlyter (Verts/ALE), Nikos Chrysogelos (Verts/ALE), Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE), Monika Panayotova (PPE) och Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D)

(15 april 2014)

Angående: Inflammatorisk tarmsjukdom

Inflammatorisk tarmsjukdom är en kronisk sjukdom som drabbar över 2,5–3 miljoner personer i Europa (5,5–7 miljoner i hela världen). Dessa siffror förväntas öka ytterligare. Inflammatorisk tarmsjukdom kan inträffa vid vilken ålder som helst, men drabbar särskilt ofta barn och unga vuxna. Symptomen omfattar diarré, ändtarmsblödning, kramp, trötthet, viktnedgång och, när det rör barn, försenad tillväxt och pubertet. Symptomen leder ofta till sjukhusinläggning, och under de senaste fem åren har 85 % av de som har drabbats av inflammatorisk tarmsjukdom varit tvungna att få specialvård på sjukhus. Inflammatorisk tarmsjukdom kan dessutom orsaka allvarlig skada på matsmältningssystemet, och minst hälften av alla drabbade måste opereras.

Trots dessa oroande omständigheter är kännedomen om inflammatorisk tarmsjukdom ganska låg bland EU-medborgarna, vilket bidrar till social isolering, lägre skolnärvaro och minskat deltagande i arbetslivet bland de som har drabbats av sjukdomen.

2010–2011 års Impact Survey visar att omkring 25 % av de som har inflammatorisk tarmsjukdom i Europa har erfarit någon form av diskriminering. En annan oroväckande slutsats i undersökningen är graden av deltagande på arbetsmarknaden när det gäller personer som har inflammatorisk tarmsjukdom, i och med att resultaten visar att sjukdomen leder till en stor frånvaro och att 44 % av de svarande t.o.m. hade förlorat eller tvingats att sluta sina jobb på grund av sjukdomen. Förutom att vara en olägenhet för de som har inflammatorisk tarmsjukdom och deras familjer, skapar även det låga deltagandet på arbetsmarknaden och de höga vårdkostnaderna en betydande ekonomisk börda för det europeiska samhället som helhet. I studien med titeln ”IBD Character” (”kännetecken för inflammatorisk tarmsjukdom”) inom ramen för det sjunde ramprogrammet kom man fram till att de årliga aggregerade kostnaderna för sjukdomen översteg 25 miljarder euro bara i Europa.

Svar från Máire Geoghegan-Quinn på kommissionens vägnar

(19 juni 2014)

Som en del av sjunde ramprogrammet för forskning (108) har kommissionen anslagit över 63 miljoner euro till stöd för forskning kring inflammatorisk tarmsjukdom. Projekten syftar bland annat till att studera tarmflorans roll i sjukdomens utveckling och att identifiera terapeutiska mål.

Horisont 2020, EU:s ramprogram för forskning och innovation (2014–2020) (109), kommer att innebära ytterligare möjligheter att stödja forskning om inflammatorisk tarmsjukdom genom samhällsutmaningen ”Hälsa, demografiska förändringar och välbefinnande”. Information om gällande finansieringsmöjligheter hittas på Portalen för forskning och innovation (110).

När det gäller utbildning är det medlemsstaterna som har ansvar för undervisningens innehåll och utbildningssystemens organisation samt deras kulturella och språkliga mångfald, vilket även omfattar fastställande av bestämmelser om obligatorisk skolgång. Skolundervisning i hemmet är en rättslig möjlighet för föräldrar i vissa länder. EU kan därför inte reglera dessa frågor.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004776/14

to the Commission

Erik Bánki (PPE), Csaba Sógor (PPE), Petru Constantin Luhan (PPE), Teresa Riera Madurell (S&D), Oreste Rossi (PPE), Carl Schlyter (Verts/ALE), Nikos Chrysogelos (Verts/ALE), Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE), Monika Panayotova (PPE) and Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D)

(15 April 2014)

Subject: Inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease which affects over 2.5 to 3 million people in Europe (5.5 to 7 million worldwide), with numbers expected to increase further. IBD can occur at any age, but is diagnosed especially frequently among children and young adults. Symptoms include diarrhoea, rectal bleeding, cramps, fatigue, weight loss and, particular to children, delays in growth and the onset of puberty. Symptoms often lead to hospitalisation, with 85% of IBD sufferers in Europe having required special treatment in hospitals over the past five years. Furthermore, IBD can cause severe damage to the digestive tract, with at least half of all sufferers requiring surgery.

Despite these worrying facts, the level of awareness on IBD is rather low among EU citizens, which contributes to social isolation, reduced school attendance and reduced participation on the labour market among IBD sufferers.

The 2010-2011 Impact survey showed that around 25% of IBD sufferers in Europe experience some sort of discrimination. Another alarming finding in the survey is the level of participation on the labour market of those suffering from IBD, with the results showing that the disease leads to high levels of absenteeism and that 44% of respondents had even lost or been obliged to quit their jobs as a result of IBD. In addition to being an inconvenience for IBD sufferers and their families, low labour market participation and the high costs of treatment also place a significant economic burden on European society as a whole. The FP7‐funded study entitled ‘IBD Character’ found that the annual aggregate costs of IBD exceed EUR 25 billion in Europe alone.

Answer given by Ms Geoghegan-Quinn on behalf of the Commission

(19 June 2014)

As part of FP7 (114), the Commission has devoted over EUR 63 million to support research on IBD. The projects addressed, amongst other issues, the role of intestinal microbiota in the development of the disease and the identification of therapeutic targets.

Horizon 2020, — the EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) (115), will provide further opportunities to support research on IBD through its ‘Health, demographic change and wellbeing’ societal challenge. Information on current funding opportunities can be obtained at the Research and Innovation Participant Portal (116).

As regards education, Member States have full responsibility for the content of teaching and the organisation of education systems and their cultural and linguistic diversity, including the definition of rules about compulsory attendance. Home schooling is a legal option for parents in some countries. The EU is therefore not in a position to regulate on these issues.

(Version française)

Question avec demande de réponse écrite E-004823/14

à la Commission

Judith Sargentini (Verts/ALE), Jean Lambert (Verts/ALE) et Karima Delli (Verts/ALE)

(15 avril 2014)

Objet: Lutte contre l'esclavage moderne dans l'industrie du textile et du vêtement d'Inde du Sud

Réponse donnée par M. De Gucht au nom de la Commission

(9 juillet 2014)

La Commission renvoie aux réponses aux questions écrites E-001968/2014 et E-000021/2014 relatives au travail des enfants.

La Commission est consciente du fait que les conditions de travail dans l'industrie indienne du vêtement peuvent être particulièrement difficiles, notamment pour les groupes vulnérables. La ratification et la mise en œuvre effective des conventions fondamentales de l'Organisation internationale du travail, notamment sur l'âge minimum et sur les pires formes de travail des enfants, sont régulièrement évoquées lors du dialogue de haut niveau avec l'Inde. L'UE a fait savoir à plusieurs reprises que cette ratification constituerait un signal très important pour le monde, en conformité avec le statut de l'Inde en tant qu'acteur mondial majeur et partenaire stratégique de l'Europe. L'UE poursuit avec l'Inde un dialogue sur l'emploi et la politique sociale, qui porte également sur des sujets tels que la protection sociale et la santé et la sécurité au travail.

Aujourd'hui, dans l'UE, les entreprises peuvent adopter ou élaborer leurs propres codes de conduite concernant leurs pratiques d'achat et d'approvisionnement et le respect des normes internationales (notamment ISO 26000), sur une base volontaire. Comme indiqué dans le rapport (121) au Parlement européen et au Conseil du 25 septembre 2013, il ne semble pas nécessaire d'inclure des exigences de label social dans le règlement sur les produits textiles (122).

(Nederlandse versie)

Vraag met verzoek om schriftelijk antwoord E-004823/14

aan de Commissie

Judith Sargentini (Verts/ALE), Jean Lambert (Verts/ALE) en Karima Delli (Verts/ALE)

(15 april 2014)

Betreft: Moderne slavernij in de textiel‐ en kledingindustrie in Zuid-India

Antwoord van de heer De Gucht namens de Commissie

(9 juli 2014)

De Commissie verwijst naar haar antwoorden op de schriftelijke vragen E-001968/2014 en E-000021/2014 met betrekking tot kinderarbeid.

De Commissie is zich ervan bewust dat de werkomstandigheden in de Indiase kledingindustrie bijzonder hard kunnen zijn, met name voor kwetsbare groepen. De ratificatie en de daadwerkelijke uitvoering van de kernverdragen van de Internationale Arbeidsorganisatie, waaronder de verdragen betreffende de minumumleeftijd en de ergste vormen van kinderarbeid, worden regelmatig naar voren gebracht bij de dialoog op hoog niveau met India. De EU heeft meermaals laten weten dat dit een zeer belangrijk signaal zou geven aan de wereld dat zou aansluiten bij de status van India als wereldwijde speler en strategische partner van Europa. De EU onderhoudt een dialoog met India over werkgelegenheid en sociaal beleid, die ook onderwerpen bestrijkt zoals sociale zekerheid, gezondheid en veiligheid op het werk.

Vandaag kunnen ondernemingen in de EU zich op vrijwillige basis houden aan gedragscodes of deze zelf ontwikkelen op het  terrein van bedrijfsaankopen en gedragscodes en de naleving van internationale normen (voornamelijk ISO 26000). Zoals aangegeven in het verslag (124) aan het Europees Parlement en de Raad van 25 september 2013 wordt het in het kader van de textielverordening (125) niet nodig geacht om algemene etiketteringsvoorschriften op te nemen.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004823/14

to the Commission

Judith Sargentini (Verts/ALE), Jean Lambert (Verts/ALE) and Karima Delli (Verts/ALE)

(15 April 2014)

Subject: Tackling modern slavery in the South Indian textile and garment industry

Answer given by Mr De Gucht on behalf of the Commission

(9 July 2014)

The Commission refers to the replies to written questions E-001968/2014 and E-000021/2014 regarding child labour.

The Commission is aware that working conditions in Indian garment industry can be particularly difficult, especially for vulnerable groups. The ratification and effective implementation of the fundamental Conventions of the International Labour Organisation, including on minimum age and on the worst forms of child labour, is regularly brought up at the high level dialogue with India. The EU has repeatedly communicated that it would constitute a very important signal to the world in line with India's status of key global player and Europe's strategic partner. The EU maintains a dialogue with India on employment and social policy that also covers subjects such as social protection and health and safety at work.

Today, in the EU, enterprises can adhere to or develop their own codes of conduct, regarding corporate purchasing and sourcing practices, and compliance with international standards (notably ISO 26000), on a voluntary basis. As indicated in the report (127) to the European Parliament and the Council of 25 September 2013, there is no perceived need to include social labelling requirements in the framework of the Textile Regulation (128).

(Versão portuguesa)

Pergunta com pedido de resposta escrita E-004824/14

à Comissão (Vice-Presidente/Alta Representante)

Ana Gomes (S&D)

(15 de abril de 2014)

Assunto: VP/HR — Os processos de Bakhytzhan Kashkumbayev e de Aron Atabek no Cazaquistão

O pastor de sessenta e sete anos de idade Bakhytzhan Kashkumbayev, que tem problemas de saúde, esteve em prisão preventiva durante nove meses. O pastor foi acusado de extremismo, de incitação ao ódio religioso e de dirigir uma associação religiosa ilegal. Foi condenado a quatro anos de prisão com pena suspensa por ter infligido de forma intencional ofensas corporais graves. O pastor foi internado sob coação num hospital psiquiátrico, em que lhe restringiram o seu direito de defesa e a possibilidade de receber cuidados médicos em tempo útil. Algumas organizações de defesa dos direitos humanos reconheceram Bakhytzhan Kashkumbayev como sendo um preso político, tendo apelado para que a liberdade de consciência e de religião no Cazaquistão deixassem de ser limitadas.

Aron Atabek, célebre dissidente e poeta cazaque, bem como preso político, está preso já há mais de seis anos. Durante vários anos, esteve preso em regime de isolamento numa das prisões do regime mais rígidas do país. Embora estivesse preso, continuou a criticar, nas suas obras, o regime de Nursultan Nazarbayev, motivo pelo qual sofreu várias pressões e um duro tratamento por parte da administração. Em conformidade com a sentença do tribunal, o dissidente de sessenta e um anos de idade apenas será libertado em 2024.

Resposta dada pela Alta Representante/Vice-Presidente Catherine Ashton em nome da Comissão

(10 de julho de 2014)

A AR/VP acompanha de perto a situação dos direitos humanos no Cazaquistão e aborda regularmente questões de direitos humanos nos seus contactos com as autoridades cazaques a todos os níveis, incluindo nas reuniões anuais do diálogo UE-Cazaquistão sobre direitos humanos. A AR/VP segue igualmente de perto um certo número de casos individuais que suscitam preocupações no Cazaquistão, incluindo os casos dos Senhores Aron Atabek e Bakhytzhan Kashkumbayev.

A AR/VP foi informada de que o Senhor Atabek foi recentemente transferido para um estabelecimento prisional perto de Karaganda sem qualquer notificação à sua família e apesar de a sua família ter solicitado uma transferência para um estabelecimento nas proximidades da residência familiar em Almaty. A UE manifestou as suas preocupações relativamente ao tratamento reservado ao Senhor Atabek às autoridades do Cazaquistão, convidando-as a rever o seu estatuto.

A AR/VP, através da delegação da UE em Astana, tem vindo a acompanhar o caso do pastor Kashkumbayev desde a sua detenção, em maio de 2013, e os funcionários da delegação da UE assistiram regularmente às audiências em tribunal relativas ao seu caso durante cerca de três semanas em janeiro e fevereiro de 2014. Além disso, os representantes da delegação da UE reuniram-se com o advogado do referido pastor e com a sua mulher para debater o caso. A HR/VP informou as autoridades cazaques das suas preocupações relativas ao tratamento reservado ao pastor Kashkumbayev e solicitou que estas voltassem a examinar o seu caso.

A EU acompanha e continuará a acompanhar a evolução destes dois casos muito de perto e a encorajar as autoridades cazaques a reverem os casos de ambos, em consonância com os compromissos internacionais do Cazaquistão.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004824/14

to the Commission (Vice-President/High Representative)

Ana Gomes (S&D)

(15 April 2014)

Subject: VP/HR — Cases of Bakhytzhan Kashkumbayev and Aron Atabek in Kazakhstan

67-year-old pastor Bakhytzhan Kashkumbayev, who has health problems, was remanded in custody for nine months. The church minister faced charges of extremism, inciting religious hatred and leadership of an illegal religious association. He received a suspended sentence of four years’ imprisonment on charges of intentionally causing grievous bodily harm. The pastor was forcibly placed in a psychiatric hospital, while his right to a defence and ability to obtain timely medical care were restricted. Human rights organisations recognised Bakhytzhan Kashkumbayev as a political prisoner and are issuing calls to cease the restriction of freedom of conscience and religion in Kazakhstan.

Aron Atabek, well-known Kazakhstan dissident and poet, as well as political prisoner, has been behind bars for over six years now. For a number of years, he has been kept in a solitary confinement cell in one of the most rigid regime prisons of the country; despite his imprisonment, he has continued to criticise the regime of Nursultan Nazarbayev in his works, due to which he was subjected to various forms of pressure and harsh treatment from the administration. According to the court sentence, the 61-year-old dissident will only be allowed to walk free in 2024.

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(10 July 2014)

The HR/VP closely follows the human rights situation in Kazakhstan, and regularly raises human rights issues in its contacts with the Kazakh authorities at all levels, including in the annual meetings of the EU-Kazakhstan Human Rights Dialogue. The HR/VP also closely follows a number of individual cases of concern in Kazakhstan, including the cases of Mr Aron Atabek and Mr Bakhytzhan Kashkumbayev.

The HR/VP has been informed that Mr Atabek was recently transferred to a prison colony near Karaganda without any notification being given to his family, and despite his family enquiring about a transfer to a facility near the family home in Almaty. The EU has conveyed its concerns regarding the treatment of Mr Atabek to the Kazakh authorities, and encouraged them to review his status.

The HR/VP, through the EU Delegation in Astana, has been monitoring the case of Pastor Kashkumbayev since his arrest in May 2013, and EU Delegation officials attended the court hearings in his case on a regular basis for almost three weeks in January and February 2014. Moreover, EU Delegation representatives have met with the Pastor's lawyer and his wife to discuss the case.The HR/VP has informed the Kazakh authorities of its concerns regarding the treatment of Pastor Kashkumbayev and encouraged them to review his case.

The EU is and will continue to follow the developments in these two cases very closely and to encourage the Kazakh authorities to review the cases of both individuals, in line with the international commitments of Kazakhstan.

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-004827/14

lill-Kummissjoni

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(15 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: L-implimentazzjoni tal-Patt Fiskali

Il-Patt Fiskali jirrikjedi lill-Istati Membri tal-UE biex jgħaddu, fi żmien sena mid-dħul fis-seħħ għalihom tat-trattat, “liġi tal-implimentazzjoni” domestika li tistabbilixxi mekkaniżmu awtomatiku ta' korrezzjoni, ibbażat fuq ir-riżultati ta' sorveljanza li ssir kull xahar minn kunsill fiskali konsultattiv indipendenti, sabiex jiggarantixxu li l-baġit nazzjonali tagħhom ikun ibbilanċjat jew ikollu bilanċ pożittiv skont id-definizzjoni stabbilita fil-Patt.

Il-Kummissjoni għandha informazzjoni dwar il-miżuri meħuda mill-Istati Membri tal-UE kollha biex jittrasponi l-miżuri tal-Patt Fiskali fil-liġi domestika tiegħu?

Tweġiba mogħtija mis-Sur Kallas f'isem il-Kummissjoni

(10 ta' Lulju 2014)

Il-Kummissjoni bħalissa qiegħda tanalizza d-dispożizzjonijiet nazzjonali tal-Partijiet Kontraenti bl-għan li tivvaluta l-konformità tagħhom mal-Artikolu 3.2 tat-Trattat dwar l-Istabbiltà, il-Koordinazzjoni u l-Governanza (TSKG) fl-Unjoni Ekonomika u Monetarja, kif meħtieġ mill-Artikolu 8.1 tat-TSKG. L-analiżi ser isservi bħala bażi għal rapport li l-Kummissjoni se tippreżenta fi żmien xieraq, kif meħtieġ mill-Artikolu 8. 1 tat-TSKG.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004827/14

to the Commission

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(15 April 2014)

Subject: Fiscal Compact implementation

The Fiscal Compact requires the EU Member States to enact, within one year of the date the treaty enters into force for them, a domestic ‘implementation law’ establishing an automatic correction mechanism based on the results of monthly surveillance, which should be carried out by an independent fiscal advisory council, so as to guarantee that their national budget is balanced or in surplus in accordance with the definition set out in the Compact.

Does the Commission have information on the measures taken by all the EU Member States to transpose the measures of the Fiscal Compact into its domestic law?

Answer given by Mr Kallas on behalf of the Commission

(10 July 2014)

The Commission is currently in the process of analysing national provisions of Contracting Parties with a view to assessing their compliance with Article 3.2 of the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance (TSCG) in the Economic and Monetary Union, as requested by Article 8.1 of the TSCG. The analysis will serve as a basis for a report that the Commission will present in due time, as requested by Article 8.1 of the TSCG.

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-004882/14

lill-Kummissjoni

Marlene Mizzi (S&D)

(16 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: Il-Memorandum ta' Budapest tal-1994

Fl-1994 ir-Renju Unit, l-Istati Uniti u r-Russja wiegħdu solennement li jirrispettaw is-sovranità u l-fruntieri tal-Ukraina filwaqt li l-Ukraina tirrinunzja għall-armi nukleari. Għaliex dan il-memorandum mhux qed jissemma bħala preludju biex tonqos it-tensjoni fil-kriżi tal-Ukraina?

Tweġiba mogħtija mir-Rappreżentant Għoli/il-Viċi President Ashton f'isem il-Kummissjoni

(26 ta' Ġunju 2014)

Fil-konklużjonijiet tagħhom (129) tat-3 ta’ Marzu 2014, il-Ministri tal-Affarijiet Barranin tal-UE kkundannaw il-vjolazzjoni ċara tas-sovranità u l-integrità territorjali tal-Ukraina mill-forzi armati Russi kif ukoll l-awtorizzazzjoni mogħtija mill-Kunsill tal-Federazzjoni tar-Russja għall-użu tal-forzi armati fit-territorju tal-Ukraina. Dawn l-azzjonijiet fuq il-peniżola Krimea u fil-Lvant tal-Ukraina huma ksur ċar tal-Karta tan-Nazzjonijiet Uniti u l-Att Finali ta’ Ħelsinki tal-OSKE, kif ukoll l-impenji speċifiċi tar-Russja li tirrispetta s-sovranità u l-integrità territorjali tal-Ukraina skont il-Memorandum ta’ Budapest tal-1994 u t-Trattat bilaterali dwar il-Ħbiberija, Kooperazzjoni u Sħubija tal-1997. Huma wkoll ksur ċar tal-Kostituzzjoni tal-Ukraina, li speċifikament tirrikonoxxi l-integrità territorjali tal-pajjiż u tiddikkjara li r-Repubblika Awtonoma tal-Krimea tista’ biss torganizza referenda dwar kwistjonijiet lokali imma mhux dwar il-modifika tal-konfigurazzjoni territorjali tal-Ukraina. Il-Ministri tal-Affarijiet Barranin tal-UE sejħu lir-Russja sabiex tirtira minnufih il-forzi armati tagħha għaż-żoni ta’ stazzjonar permanenti tagħhom, skont il-Ftehim dwar l-Istatus u l-Kondizzjonijiet tal-Istazzjonar tal-Flotta tal-Baħar l-Iswed fit-territorju tal-Ukraina tal-1997. Huma appellaw ukoll lir-Russja biex taqbel mat-talba tal-Ukraina li jkun hemm konsultazzjonijiet, kif previst fit-Trattat bilaterali dwar il-Ħbiberija, Kooperazzjoni u Sħubija tal-1997, u biex tieħu sehem f’konsultazzjonijiet urġenti fost il-firmatarji kollha u dawk aderenti għall-Memorandum ta’ Budapest tal-1994.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004882/14

to the Commission

Marlene Mizzi (S&D)

(16 April 2014)

Subject: Budapest Memorandum of 1994

In 1994 the United Kingdom, the US and Russia solemnly promised to respect Ukraine’s sovereignty and borders in exchange for it giving up nuclear weapons. Why is this memorandum not being mentioned as a prelude to de-escalation of the Ukraine crisis?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(26 June 2014)

In their conclusions (130) of 3 March 2014, EU Foreign Ministers condemned the clear violation of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity by the Russian armed forces as well as the authorisation given by the Federation Council of Russia for the use of the armed forces on the territory of Ukraine. These actions on the Crimean peninsula and in Eastern Ukraine are in clear breach of the UN Charter and the OSCE Helsinki Final Act, as well as of Russia's specific commitments to respect Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity under the Budapest Memorandum of 1994 and the bilateral Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership of 1997. They are also a clear breach of the Ukrainian constitution, which specifically recognises the territorial integrity of the country and states that the Autonomous Republic of Crimea can only organise referenda on local matters but not on the modification of the territorial configuration of Ukraine. EU Foreign Ministers called on Russia to immediately withdraw its armed forces to the areas of their permanent stationing, in accordance with the Agreement on the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet stationing on the territory of Ukraine of 1997. They also called on Russia to agree to the request by Ukraine to hold consultations, as foreseen in the bilateral Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership of 1997, and to take part in urgent consultations among all signatories and adherents of the Budapest Memorandum of 1994.

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-004970/14

lill-Kunsill

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(16 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: Is-sikurezza tal-ikel fil-prodotti agrikoli

L-objettiv tal-UE fir-rigward tas-sikurezza tal-ikel huwa li tħares is-saħħa u l-interessi tal-konsumatur filwaqt li tiggarantixxi l-funzjonament bla xkiel tas-suq uniku.

Id-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 91/676/KEE għandha l-għan li tipproteġi l-ilma mit-tniġġis ikkawżat permezz ta' nitrati minn sorsi agrikoli permezz ta' għadd ta' miżuri li huma r-responsabbiltà tal-Istati Membri. Dawn il-miżuri jinvolvu l-monitoraġġ tal-ilmijiet tal-wiċċ u l-ilma ta' taħt l-art, l-identifikazzjoni ta' żoni vulnerabbli, l-introduzzjoni ta' kodiċi ta' prattiki agrikoli tajbin, l-adozzjoni ta' programmi ta' azzjoni u l-evalwazzjoni tal-azzjonijiet implimentati.

Jista' l-Kunsill jipprovdi informazzjoni dwar il-miżuri li ttieħdu mill-Istati Membri kollha tal-UE għall-implimentazzjoni tad-dispożizzjonijiet tad-direttiva, u jindika kif id-Direttiva qed tiġi mmonitorjata fl-Istati Membri kollha tal-UE?

Tweġiba

(8 ta' Lulju 2014)

Il-Kummissjoni, bħala l-għassies tat-Trattati, hija responsabbli għas-superviżjoni tal-applikazzjoni tad-dritt tal-Unjoni mill-Istati Membri. L-Onorevoli Membru hija għalhekk mistiedna tindirizza l-mistoqsija tagħha lill-Kummissjoni.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004970/14

to the Council

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(16 April 2014)

Subject: Food safety in agricultural products

The objective of EU food safety is to protect consumer health and interests while guaranteeing the smooth operation of the single market.

Council Directive 91/676/EEC aims to protect waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources through a number of measures incumbent on Member States. These measures involve monitoring surface waters and groundwater, designating vulnerable zones, introducing codes of good agricultural practice, adopting action programmes and evaluating the actions implemented.

Can the Council provide information on the measures that have been taken by all the EU Member States to implement the provisions of the directive, and indicate how the directive is being monitored in all the EU Member States?

Reply

(8 July 2014)

The Commission, as guardian of the Treaties, is responsible for overseeing Member States' application of Union law. The Honourable Member is therefore invited to address her question to the Commission.

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-004996/14

lill-Kummissjoni

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(16 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: Is-sikurezza tal-ikel fil-prodotti agrikoli

L-objettiv tal-UE fir-rigward tas-sikurezza tal-ikel huwa li tħares is-saħħa u l-interessi tal-konsumatur filwaqt li tiggarantixxi l-funzjonament bla xkiel tas-suq uniku.

Id-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 91/676/KEE għandha l-għan li tipproteġi l-ilma mit-tniġġis ikkawżat permezz ta' nitrati minn sorsi agrikoli permezz ta' għadd ta' miżuri li huma r-responsabbiltà tal-Istati Membri. Dawn il-miżuri jinvolvu l-monitoraġġ tal-ilmijiet tal-wiċċ u l-ilma ta' taħt l-art, l-identifikazzjoni ta' żoni vulnerabbli, l-introduzzjoni ta' kodiċi ta' prattiki agrikoli tajbin, l-adozzjoni ta' programmi ta' azzjoni u l-evalwazzjoni tal-azzjonijiet implimentati.

Tista' l-Kummissjoni tipprovdi informazzjoni dwar il-miżuri li ttieħdu mill-Istati Membri kollha tal-UE għall-implimentazzjoni tad-dispożizzjonijiet tad-direttiva, u tindika kif id-Direttiva qed tiġi mmonitorjata fl-Istati Membri kollha tal-UE?

Tweġiba mogħtija mis-Sur Potočnik f'isem il-Kummissjoni

(14 ta' Lulju 2014)

Il-Kummissjoni tissorvelja l-evoluzzjoni tat-tniġġis tal-ilma kkawżat min-nitrati abbażi tal-informazzjoni li waslet mill-Istati Membri skont l-Artikolu 10 tad-Direttiva. Ir-rapport adottat u ppubblikat kull erba’ snin mill-Kummissjoni skont l-Artikolu 11 tad-Direttiva jipprovdi ħarsa ġenerali lejn l-implimentazzjoni tad-Direttiva dwar in-Nitrati (131) fl-Istati Membri, inklużi l-miżuri meħuda u l-monitoraġġ. L-aktar wieħed reċenti ġie adottat f’Settembru 2013 u jkopri l-perjodu 2008-2011 (132).

(English version)

Question for written answer E-004996/14

to the Commission

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(16 April 2014)

Subject: Food safety in agricultural products

The objective of EU food safety is to protect consumer health and interests while guaranteeing the smooth operation of the single market.

Council Directive 91/676/EEC aims to protect waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources through a number of measures incumbent on Member States. These measures involve monitoring surface waters and groundwater, designating vulnerable zones, introducing codes of good agricultural practice, adopting action programmes and evaluating the actions implemented.

Can the Commission provide information on the measures that have been taken by all the EU Member States to implement the provisions of the directive, and indicate how the directive is being monitored in all the EU Member States?

Answer given by Mr Potočnik on behalf of the Commission

(14 July 2014)

The Commission monitors the evolution of water pollution with nitrates on the basis of the information received from Member States pursuant to Article 10 of the directive. An overview of the implementation of Nitrates Directive (133) in the Member States, including measures taken and monitoring, is provided by the report that the Commission adopts and makes public every four years pursuant to Article 11 of the directive. The most recent one was adopted in September 2013 and covers the period 2008‐2011 (134).

(Versiunea în limba română)

Întrebarea cu solicitare de răspuns scris E-005032/14

adresată Comisiei

Monica Luisa Macovei (PPE)

(16 aprilie 2014)

Subiect: Discriminarea femeilor în Irak

La 25 februarie 2014, Consiliul de Miniștri din Irak a aprobat un proiect de propunere legislativă care restricționează drepturile femeilor în materie de moștenire și drepturi părintești, precum și alte drepturi după divorț, proiect ce permite fetelor sa se căsătorească de la vârsta de nouă ani.

Proiectul de lege, numit Legea Jaafari privind Statutul personal, are la bază principiile școlii Jaafari în domeniul jurisprudenței religioase șiite care discriminează femeile și încalcă drepturile omului.

La 8 martie, Ziua Internațională a Femeii, Rețeaua femeilor irakiene, o asociație de grupuri pentru drepturile femeilor, a organizat proteste, declarând 8 martie zi de doliu în Irak.

Proiectul de lege urmează să fie votat de parlament în perioada următoare.

Având în vedere faptul că pentru perioada 2014-2020, UE a alocat 75 de milioane de euro pentru consolidarea drepturilor omului și a statului de drept în Irak, ce acțiuni poate să adopte și va adopta Comisia pentru a asigura protecția fetelor și a femeilor în cadrul legislativ irakian, în conformitate cu obligațiile sale internaționale?

Răspuns dat de dna Ashton, Înalt Reprezentant/Vicepreședinte în numele Comisiei

(11 iunie 2014)

UE este conștientă de relatările privind dezbaterile pe marginea proiectului de lege Jaafari privind statutul personal și urmărește îndeaproape această chestiune. Cu toate acestea, potrivit celor mai recente informații, pare foarte puțin probabil ca proiectul de lege să fie aprobat de Consiliul Reprezentanților, deoarece inițiativa pare să provină din partea unui grup restrâns și nu va obține majoritatea necesară de voturi în Parlament.

UE își exprimă, în mod sistematic, preocupările privind drepturile omului față de autoritățile irakiene, atât în mod public, cât și prin canale diplomatice. Drepturile omului, inclusiv drepturile femeilor și egalitatea de șanse între femei și bărbați sunt, de asemenea, discutate în contextul subcomitetului privind democrația și drepturile omului din cadrul Acordului de parteneriat și cooperare UE-Irak, a cărei primă reuniune, în noiembrie 2013, a suscitat preocupări specifice privind proiectul de lege Jaafari.

UE sprijină, de asemenea, Irakul în vederea îmbunătățirii egalității între femei și bărbați prin asistența pentru dezvoltare pe care o acordă. Programele actuale și viitoare abordează acest aspect în mod orizontal, iar egalitatea de șanse între femei și bărbați va continua să facă parte din activitățile în domeniul drepturilor omului și al statului de drept, al educației primare și secundare și al „energiei pentru toți”.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005032/14

to the Commission

Monica Luisa Macovei (PPE)

(16 April 2014)

Subject: Discrimination of women in Iraq

A draft legislation proposal restricting the rights of women in matters of inheritance, limiting their parental and other rights after divorce, and allowing girls to be married from the age of nine, was approved by the Iraqi Council of Ministers on 25 February 2014.

The draft law, called the Jaafari Personal Status Law, is based on the principles of the Jaafari school of Shia religious jurisprudence, which discriminates against women and violates human rights.

On 8 March 2014 — International Women’s Day — the Iraqi Women’s Network, an association of women’s rights groups, held protests, calling it a day of mourning in Iraq.

The Iraqi parliament is soon expected to vote on the draft legislation.

Taking into account the fact that, for the period 2014-2020, the EU has earmarked EUR 75 million to efforts to strengthen the situation for human rights and the rule of law in Iraq, what action can and will the Commission take to ensure that Iraq’s legal framework protects women and girls a manner that is in line with the country’s international obligations?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(11 June 2014)

The EU is well aware of the reported debates around the proposed Jaafari draft law on Personal Status and follows the issue closely. However, according to the latest information, it looks highly unlikely that the bill will be approved by the Council of Representatives, since the initiative seems to be coming from a small group and will not get the necessary majority of votes in the parliament.

The EU consistently voices its concerns on human rights to the Iraqi authorities, both publicly and through diplomatic channels. Human rights, including Women's rights and gender issues are also discussed in the context of the sub-committee on Democracy and Human Rights of the EU-Iraq Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA), the first meeting of which, in November 2013, raised specific concerns on the Jaafari draft law.

The EU is also supporting Iraq in enhancing gender equality through its development assistance. Current and future programmes are tackling this issue in a horizontal manner and gender equality will continue to be part of the activities in the fields of human rights and rule of law, primary and secondary education and ‘energy for all’.

(Versiunea în limba română)

Întrebarea cu solicitare de răspuns scris E-005033/14

adresată Comisiei

Monica Luisa Macovei (PPE)

(16 aprilie 2014)

Subiect: Căsătoria copiilor în Malawi

În martie 2014, Human Rights Watch a prezentat un raport detaliat cu privire la situația căsătoriilor copiilor în Malawi. Din cauza nivelului ridicat de sărăcie, fete minore sunt obligate de familiile lor să abandoneze studiile pentru a se căsători. În perioada 2010-2013, cel puțin 40 000 de fete aflate încă în ciclul primar, și 10 000 de fete din ciclul secundar au părăsit școala pentru a se căsători, în anumite cazuri, pentru că erau însărcinate. Multe dintre aceste fete sunt victime ale violenței conjugale sau contractează HIV.

Într-un comunicat de presă din martie 2013, Comisia a afirmat că în perioada 2008-2013 a investit suma de 146 de milioane EUR în programele de combatere a HIV/SIDA și de promovare a egalității de gen, printre alte obiective. Având în vedere acest context, ar putea Comisia să răspundă la următoarele întrebări:

Răspuns dat de dl Piebalgs în numele Comisiei

(13 iunie 2014)

Căsătoriile la o vârstă precoce reprezintă o problemă în Malawi, având consecințe care merg de la părăsirea timpurie a școlii de către fete până la expunerea acestora la acte de violență, infectarea cu HIV și sarcini precoce. UE abordează aceste aspecte prin diferite programe. Mai multe informații cu privire la acestea sunt disponibile în anexă.

UE contribuie la Fondul global (GFATM) de luptă împotriva HIV/SIDA, tuberculozei și malariei. GFATM finanțează, printre altele, achiziția de antiretrovirale și programele care se concentrează pe sexualitatea tinerilor și pe legătura dintre HIV/SIDA și drepturile la sănătate sexuală și reproductivă ca un instrument de emancipare a fetelor cu privire la HIV/SIDA.

La nivel subregional, UE colaborează cu Programul Comun al Națiunilor Unite pentru HIV/SIDA (UNAIDS) și cu Departamentul pentru nutriție și pentru combaterea HIV/SIDA din cadrul guvernului malawian cu scopul de a elabora un plan de consolidare a capacităților la nivel național pentru a combate HIV/SIDA și pentru a promova totodată egalitatea de gen. Un alt program regional include diverse acțiuni, printre care și sprijinul pentru integrarea drepturilor la sănătate sexuală și reproductivă și a drepturilor persoanelor infectate cu HIV în documentele de politică națională. Alte rezultate înregistrate până în prezent includ: reducerea numărului de persoane care întrerup tratamentul cu antiretrovirale, creșterea ratei de utilizare a serviciilor de planificare familială și creșterea gradului de sensibilizare a fetelor cu privire la legătura dintre HIV/SIDA și drepturile la sănătate sexuală și reproductivă.

În ceea ce privește, mai precis, întrebarea privind sprijinul pentru menținerea fetelor în școli, UE contribuie la Programul pentru egalitatea de șanse între femei și bărbați și emanciparea femeilor (GEWE) alături de Fondul ONU pentru Populație (UNFPA) și de Ministerul pentru Egalitate de Gen, Copii și Bunăstare Socială. Acțiunile întreprinse în cadrul acestui program includ sprijinirea finalizării legii privind căsătoria, divorțul și familia. De asemenea, UE ajută la menținerea fetelor în școli în anumite districte-țintă, de exemplu, prin acordarea de asistență în vederea readmiterii fetelor care au părăsit școala, prin furnizarea de materiale de învățare pentru fete, prin achitarea taxelor de școlarizare etc.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005033/14

to the Commission

Monica Luisa Macovei (PPE)

(16 April 2014)

Subject: Child marriage in Malawi

In March 2014, Human Rights Watch released a detailed report about the situation of child marriage in Malawi. Prompted by the high level of poverty, underage girls are forced by their families to abandon their education in order to marry. Between 2010 and 2013, at least 40 000 girls still in primary school, and 10 000 girls in secondary school, left school to be married, in some cases because they were pregnant. Many of these girls are subjected to violence in their marriages or end up contracting HIV.

The Commission stated in a press release in March 2013 that in the period 2008-2013 it invested EUR 146 million in programmes to fight HIV-AIDS and support gender promotion, among other aims. Against this background, could the Commission answer the following:

Answer given by Mr Piebalgs on behalf of the Commission

(13 June 2014)

Child marriage is an issue in Malawi with consequences ranging from taking girls out of school, exposure to violence and HIV and early pregnancy. These aspects are tackled by the EU through various programmes on which more information is provided in the annex.

The EU contributes to the Global Fund (GF) for HIV-AIDS and Malaria. The GF, inter alia, funds the procurement of Anti retrovirals (ART) and programmes with an emphasis on youth sexuality and linking HIV-AIDS to sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR/HIV) as a means of empowering the girl child on issues of HIV-AIDS.

At sub-regional level, the EU is working with UNAIDS and the Department of Nutrition and HIV-AIDS (DNHA), to develop a national capacity building plan to respond to HIV-AIDS, with links to gender promotion. Another regional programme includes various actions, among which upport for the integration of HIV and sexual and reproductive health rights in national policy documents. Other results include: reduction in defaulters in ARTs, increased utilisation of family planning services and increasing girls' awareness of SRHR/HIV.

Concerning more specifically the question on support to keeping girls in schools, the EU is contributing to the Gender and Women’s Empowerment Programme (GEWE) with the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the Ministry of Gender, Children and Social Welfare. Actions include supporting the finalisation of the Marriage, Divorce, and Family Bill. It is also providing assistance to keeping girls in schools in the target districts for instance by providing assistance to the readmission of drop out girls, supporting girls with learning materials and school fees, etc.

(Versiunea în limba română)

Întrebarea cu solicitare de răspuns scris E-005034/14

adresată Comisiei

Monica Luisa Macovei (PPE)

(16 aprilie 2014)

Subiect: Libertatea de exprimare în Iordania

În World Report 2014, organizația Human Rights Wach relatează că autoritățile iordaniene nu au reușit încă să actualizeze codul penal al țării în conformitate cu amendamentele constituționale din 2011, care asigură dreptul la libertatea de exprimare pentru toți cetățenii iordanieni. La 2 iunie 2013, autoritățile au fost în măsură să blocheze peste 260 de site-uri de știri care refuzaseră să se înregistreze în conformitate cu legislația actuală a țării. În temeiul codului penal actual, în vigoare din 1960, cetățenii care protestează pașnic împotriva autorităților sau a regelui, verbal sau în scris, pot fi urmăriți cu ușurință în justiție pentru „subminarea regimului politic”.

Într-un comunicat de presă din data de 21 noiembrie 2013, Comisia a menționat că Iordaniei urmează să-i fie alocată suma de 21 milioane euro, pentru un program din primăvara anului 2014, în sprijinul reformelor pe care țara este în curs să le introducă.

Răspuns dat de dl Füle în numele Comisiei

(3 iulie 2014)

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005034/14

to the Commission

Monica Luisa Macovei (PPE)

(16 April 2014)

Subject: Freedom of speech in Jordan

In World Report 2014, Human Rights Watch reports that the Jordanian authorities have not yet managed to update the country’s penal code in accordance with constitutional amendments from 2011 ensuring the right to freedom of speech to all Jordanian civilians. On 2 June 2013 the authorities were able to block over 260 news websites that refused to be registered in compliance with the country’s current law. Under the current penal code, in force since 1960, civilians protesting peacefully against the authorities or the King, whether in speech or in writing, can easily be prosecuted for ‘undermining the political regime’.

The Commission mentioned in a press release dated 21 November 2013 that EUR 21 million will be allocated to Jordan for a spring 2014 development programme in support of reforms that the country is currently undertaking.

Answer given by Mr Füle on behalf of the Commission

(3 July 2014)

(Versiunea în limba română)

Întrebarea cu solicitare de răspuns scris E-005035/14

adresată Comisiei

Monica Luisa Macovei (PPE)

(16 aprilie 2014)

Subiect: Situația drepturilor omului în Sri Lanka

În septembrie 2013, Organizația Națiunilor Unite a semnalat încălcări sistematice ale drepturilor omului comise de guvernul din Sri Lanka și de președintele acestei țări, Mahinda Rajapaksa. În 2014, numeroși activiști au fost în continuare supuși abuzurilor. La 17 martie 2014, doi dintre activiștii cei mai importanți au fost arestați de către autoritățile de poliție în temeiul legii anti-terorism.

Ca răspuns la întrebarea scrisă E-012893/2013, Vicepreședintele/Înaltul Reprezentant, Catherine Ashton a declarat, pe 17 ianuarie 2014, că „aspectele legate de drepturile omului au fost, de asemenea, în prim plan în dialogul UE cu autoritățile din Sri Lanka, la recenta reuniune a Comisiei mixte din 3 decembrie”.

Ținând seama de turnura negativă pe care au luat-o evenimentele din Sri Lanka, cum intenționează Comisia să reacționeze la abuzurile autorităților din Sri Lanka pentru ca situația să nu degenereze și mai mult?

Răspuns dat de Înaltul Reprezentant/doamna vicepreședinte Ashton în numele Comisiei

(20 iunie 2014)

Distinsa doamnă deputat este rugată să consulte următorul răspuns: E-005338/2014.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005035/14

to the Commission

Monica Luisa Macovei (PPE)

(16 April 2014)

Subject: Human rights issues in Sri Lanka

In September 2013 the United Nations reported on constant breaches of human rights committed by the Sri Lankan Government and by its President, Mahinda Rajapaksa. Numerous activists continue to be abused in 2014. On 17 March 2014 two of the most prominent activists were arrested by police authorities acting under the anti-terrorism law.

In answer to Written Question E-012893/2013, Vice-President/High Representative Catherine Ashton stated on 17 January 2014 that ‘human rights issues were also given prominence in EU dialogue with the Sri Lankan authorities at the recent Joint Commission meeting on 3 December’.

Taking into account the negative spin that is quickly being put on events in Sri Lanka, how does the Commission intend to react to the abuse of the Sri Lanka authorities so that the situation does not degenerate further?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(20 June 2014)

The Honourable Member is refered to the following reply: E-005338/2014.

(Versiunea în limba română)

Întrebarea cu solicitare de răspuns scris E-005037/14

adresată Comisiei

Monica Luisa Macovei (PPE)

(16 aprilie 2014)

Subiect: Incălcări ale drepturilor omului comise de poliția etiopiană

În octombrie 2013, organizația Human Rights Watch a semnalat încălcarea gravă a drepturilor omului, legată de tratamentul necorespunzător al activiștilor, jurnaliștilor și opozanților politici aflați în detenție în Etiopia. Un raport anual complet referitor la Etiopia, redactat la o dată ulterioară de aceeași organizație, a menționat faptul că situația din țară nu s-a schimbat în ceea ce privește abuzurile comise de autoritățile polițienești despre care s-a relatat.

La 8 ianuarie 2014, Vicepreședintele Comisiei/Înaltul Reprezentant al Uniunii pentru afaceri externe și politica de securitate, Catherine Ashton, a răspuns la întrebarea cu solicitare de răspuns scris E-012956/2013 privind utilitatea fondurilor oferite de Comisie pentru programele de dezvoltare din Etiopia, afirmând că asistența umanitară a UE se bazează pe principiile umanității, neutralității, imparțialității și independenței, iar intervențiile se bazează pe nevoi și se concentrează asupra populațiilor celor mai vulnerabile.

Răspuns dat de Înaltul Reprezentant/doamna vicepreședinte Ashton în numele Comisiei

(13 iunie 2014)

UE urmărește îndeaproape situația drepturilor omului în Etiopia, mai ales aspectele legate de spațiul politic și de libertatea de exprimare, de asociere și a presei.

În acest context, la 6 mai 2014, purtătorul de cuvânt al SEAE a emis o declarație în care își exprima îngrijorarea „cu privire la recenta arestare a unor bloggeri, jurnaliști și membri ai opoziției” și cerea autorităților „să se asigure că procedurile se desfășoară în conformitate cu legislația etiopiană, precum și cu normele internaționale și regionale”. De asemenea, declarația a reamintit „importanța protejării spațiului destinat dialogului politic veritabil și a creării unui mediu în care vocile divergente din toate categoriile societății își pot exprima liber punctele de vedere”.

În general, considerăm că cea mai bună modalitate de a îmbunătăți situația drepturilor omului în Etiopia este prin intermediul dialogului cu guvernul și prin acordarea de asistență direcționată pentru dezvoltare. UE îi împărtășește în mod repetat guvernului etiopian procupările pe care le are în acest sens, inclusiv la cel mai înalt nivel, îndeosebi în cadrul reuniunilor de dialog politic desfășurate în temeiul articolului 8. În plus, delegația UE monitorizează procesele intentate jurnaliștilor și membrilor opoziției. În ceea ce privește cooperarea pentru dezvoltare, UE utilizează o combinație de instrumente și de canale pentru a ajuta grupurile-țintă de populație. Acestea includ asigurarea sprijinului prin intermediul guvernului, de exemplu în ceea ce privește furnizarea de servicii sociale de bază, și prin intermediul unor organizații internaționale, a unor ONG-uri și a unor organizații ale societății civile (OSC). În plus, UE este copreședinte al grupului de lucru pentru societatea civilă și facilitează astfel dialogul între guvern și organizațiile societății civile. Fondul UE pentru societatea civilă sprijină OSC-urile care lucrează în vederea elaborării unor abordări bazate pe guvernanță și pe respectarea drepturilor omului.

UE va continua să urmărească îndeaproape situația drepturilor omului în Etiopia și să-și exprime preocupările în dialogurile cu guvernul etiopian la nivelul corespunzător.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005037/14

to the Commission

Monica Luisa Macovei (PPE)

(16 April 2014)

Subject: Human rights violations by the Ethiopian police

In October 2013 Human Rights Watch reported on the serious breach of human rights regarding the poor treatment of activists, journalists and political opponents detained in Ethiopia. Since then, a complete annual report on Ethiopia, written by the same organisation, has noted that the situation in the country regarding reported abuses by police authorities has not changed.

On 8 January 2014, the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Catherine Ashton, answered Written Question E-012956/2013 concerning the usefulness of the funds that the Commission is offering for development programmes in Ethiopia, stating that ‘EU humanitarian assistance is based on the principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence; interventions are need-based and target most vulnerable populations’.

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(13 June 2014)

The EU is following closely the human rights situation in Ethiopia, notably issues related to political space and freedoms of speech, association and press.

In this context, on 06 May 2014, the EEAS spokesperson issued a statement expressing concern ‘about the recent arrests of bloggers, journalists and opposition members’ and calling on the authorities ‘to ensure that proceedings are carried out according to Ethiopian law and respecting international and regional norms’. The statement also reiterated ‘the importance of protecting space for genuine political dialogue and creating an environment in which divergent voices from all parts of society can express their views freely’.

More generally, we believe that the best way to improve the human rights situation in Ethiopia is through dialogue with the Government and targeted development assistance. The EU repeatedly shares concerns with the Government, including at the highest levels, notably during Article 8 political dialogue meetings. The EU Delegation also monitors trials of journalists and opposition members. As regards development cooperation, the EU uses a mix of instruments and channels to reach target population groups. This includes support through Government, for instance on the provision of basic social services, and through international organisations, NGOs and civil society organisations (CSOs). Moreover, the EU is co-chairing the civil society working group, thereby facilitating dialogue between Government and CSOs. The EU Civil Society Fund supports CSOs working on governance and rights-based approaches.

The EU will continue to closely follow the human rights situation in Ethiopia and to raise its concerns with the Ethiopian Government at the appropriate level.

(Versiunea în limba română)

Întrebarea cu solicitare de răspuns scris E-005038/14

adresată Comisiei

Monica Luisa Macovei (PPE)

(16 aprilie 2014)

Subiect: Utilizarea ilegală a forței împotriva protestatarilor din Yemen

În 20 și 21 februarie 2014, cel puțin 100 de protestatari s-au adunat în Yemen pentru a demonstra împotriva deciziei finale a Dialogului național vizând crearea în această țară a unui sistem federal compus din șase state. Demonstrația, pașnică la început, s-a sfârșit cu moartea unui protestatar și rănirea altor cinci de către forțele de securitate, care au utilizat gaze lacrimogene și arme împotriva protestatarilor.

Potrivit Human Rights Watch, Yemenul trebuie să respecte reglementările Națiunilor Unite care limitează utilizarea forței doar la cazurile de amenințări iminente cu moartea. Orice încălcare a reglementărilor ar trebui urmărită în justiție de către autoritățile naționale. Cu toate acestea, în Yemen, multe anchete efectuate în ultimii trei ani și care vizează utilizarea ilegală a forței de către forțele de securitate nu au fost încă finalizate.

În lumina evenimentelor recente din februarie 2014, întrebăm Comisia care sunt măsurile pe care intenționează să le adopte, pentru a garanta că sistemul judiciar își desfășoară activitatea în mod independent și transparent, astfel încât să se facă dreptate în cazurile actuale și din trecut în care forța a fost utilizată în mod ilegal împotriva protestatarilor yemeniți?

Răspuns dat de Înaltul Reprezentant/doamna vicepreședinte Ashton în numele Comisiei

(18 iunie 2014)

Uniunea Europeană știe de existența valului de demonstrații care a urmat după încheierea Dialogului național, precum și a demonstrațiilor care au marcat aniversarea revoluției în toată țara, în luna februarie.

UE oferă în prezent sprijin prin proiecte menite să îmbunătățească situația deținuților și respectarea drepturilor omului în cadrul sistemului de justiție.

Ca parte a asistenței pe care o acordă în perioada 2014-2015 Yemenului, UE va oferi, de asemenea, un sprijin specific pentru reforma sectorului de securitate din Yemen, pe baza celor mai bune practici internaționale și în vederea asigurării respectării depline a drepturilor omului și a statului de drept. Asistența acordată de UE pentru reforma sectorului de securitate din Yemen va viza instituirea și consolidarea unor instituții din cadrul securității și al justiției legitime și orientate spre servicii. Scopul acestei inițiative este de a consolida integritatea lanțului securității și justiției în Yemen, în special prin instituirea unui sistem de justiție și a unei poliții orientate spre servicii și responsabile, care să asigure respectarea drepturilor omului și a standardelor internaționale.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005038/14

to the Commission

Monica Luisa Macovei (PPE)

(16 April 2014)

Subject: Illegal use of force against Yemeni protesters

On 20 and 21 February 2014, at least 100 protesters gathered in Yemen in order to demonstrate against the conclusion of the National Dialogue to create a federal system in Yemen made up of six states. What started as a peaceful demonstration resulted in the death of one protester and the injuring of another five by the security forces, which used tear gases and guns against the protesters.

According to Human Rights Watch, Yemen is supposed to abide by the United Nations regulations which restrict the use of force to cases of imminent threats of death. Any breach of the regulation should be prosecuted by the national authorities. However, in Yemen, many investigations from the past three years on illegal use of force by the security forces are still pending an answer.

In light of the recent events of February 2014, we ask the Commission how is it planning to ensure that the judiciary system works in an independent and transparent way, in order to bring justice in the present and past cases of illegal use of force against Yemeni protesters?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(18 June 2014)

The European Union is aware of the wave of demonstrations that has followed the conclusion of the National Dialogue as well as demonstrations that marked the anniversary of the revolution all over the country in February.

This EU is currently providing support through projects designed to improve the situation of detainees and respect for human rights in the justice system.

As part of its 2014-2015 assistance to Yemen, the EU will further provide dedicated support to the reform of Yemen's security sector along international best practices and with a view to full respect of human rights and the rule of law. EU assistance to Yemen's Security Sector Reform will aim to establish and strenghten legitimate and service-oriented security and justice institutions. The purpose of this is to reinforce the integrity of the security and justice chain in Yemen, in particular through the establishment of a service-oriented and accountable police and a justice system that ensures respect for human rights and international standards.

(Version française)

Question avec demande de réponse écrite E-005066/14

à la Commission

Marc Tarabella (S&D)

(17 avril 2014)

Objet: Sites de voyage et recours

L'Europe dresse un constat accablant. De nombreux sites qui proposent de réserver des voyages en ligne ne respectent pas certaines règles européennes. La France est même un mauvais élève puisque seulement 45 % des sites sont conformes.

La Commission a mené une enquête afin de savoir comment les sites de voyages informaient les internautes. Par le biais des autorités nationales chargées de la consommation, elle dresse un constat concernant ces plateformes dans l'ensemble des États membres de l'Union. Dans son rapport, elle indique ainsi avoir étudié pas moins de 552 sites.

Après avoir mené plusieurs actions, éventuellement répressives, l'organisme précise qu'en Europe, 38 % des sites informent désormais clairement les utilisateurs quant à leurs moyens de recours ou sur le prix total du service qu'ils devront régler. Précisément, la Commission s'est penchée sur quatre points majeurs et a mis en lumière plusieurs types d'absences ou de mentions au sein de ces plateformes.

Au premier pointage réalisé en 2013, aucun des 33 sites en France ne respectaient ces obligations. Désormais, 15 d'entre eux présentent des règles conformes aux dispositions et 18 sont encore sous le coup d'une procédure. 45 % des sites étudiés sont donc conformes en France, un taux plutôt faible au regard de la moyenne européenne (62 %).

Que compte faire la Commission à propos des 209 sites qui ne se sont toujours pas mis en conformité?

De quel arsenal de sanctions administratives et juridiques disposent les autorités nationales?

Réponse donnée par M. Mimica au nom de la Commission

(14 juillet 2014)

Les autorités nationales chargées de la protection des consommateurs procèdent chaque année à une opération «coup de balai» qui porte sur des sites web d'un secteur donné et qui est coordonnée par la Commission européenne. Ce genre d'opération permet de relever les infractions à la législation relative aux consommateurs, lesquelles doivent conduire lesdites autorités à prendre les mesures d'exécution requises et à infliger aux opérateurs concernés les sanctions qui s'imposent.

Les résultats publiés le 14 avril 2014 montrent l'état d'avancement des mesures d'exécution appliquées dans les États membres pendant les six mois qui ont suivi le «coup de balai» visant des sites web de voyages. Il incombe aux autorités nationales de vérifier que les entreprises respectent les règles de l'UE et de prier les opérateurs des sites qui ne le font pas encore de modifier leurs sites en conséquence, faute de quoi ces opérateurs peuvent, en fonction des dispositions juridiques nationales, faire l'objet d'une action en justice, recevoir une amende ou être poursuivis. La résolution des problèmes transfrontaliers — c'est-à-dire, lorsque l'opérateur est établi dans un autre État membre — prend plus de temps. Sur les 552 sites visés par le «coup de balai», 66 posaient des problèmes de cet ordre.

La Commission invitera les États membres à lui faire rapport sur les affaires pendantes à l'automne prochain.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005066/14

to the Commission

Marc Tarabella (S&D)

(17 April 2014)

Subject: Travel websites and redress

Europe paints a shocking picture. Many websites which offer online travel reservations are not complying with some European regulations. France is itself a bad boy, since only 45% of sites comply.

The Commission has held an enquiry to find out how travel sites keep their users informed. It has drawn up a report into these platforms via the national consumer authorities in all the Member States of the Union. It indicates in its report that it has studied no fewer than 552 sites.

Having taken a number of actions which may even have been repressive, the organisation states that in Europe, 38% of sites provide users with clear information regarding their means of redress or the total price that they must pay for the service. The Commission has specifically focused on four major points and highlighted several elements which are or are not mentioned in these platforms.

In the first check in 2013, none of the 33 sites in France were complying with these obligations. Fifteen of them now have rules which comply with the provisions, while 18 are still facing disciplinary proceedings. 45% of the sites studied in France are therefore compliant, which is a fairly low rate compared to the European average of 62%.

What does the Commission intend to do regarding the 209 sites which are not yet compliant?

What range of administrative and legal sanctions do national authorities have at their disposal?

Answer given by Mr Mimica on behalf of the Commission

(14 July 2014)

National enforcement authorities for consumer protection carry out every year a screening of websites (known as ‘sweep’) in a given sector, which is coordinated by the European Commission. The sweep allows identifying breaches of consumer law, on which national authorities should take the appropriate enforcement measures towards the traders concerned.

The sweep results published on 14 April 2014 show the outcome of national enforcement actions carried out by the authorities during the six months after the screening of websites offering travel services. It is their responsibility to verify companies' compliance with the EU rules. The national authorities are expected to ask the traders of the remaining non-compliant sites to correct them. Otherwise, they can take legal action against the traders, fine them or take them to court, depending on the national legal provisions. Problems found on cross-border cases (where the trader is located in another Member State) normally take longer to be solved. 66 out of the 552 websites screened were cross-border cases.

The Commission will ask the Member States to report on the pending cases next Autumn.

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-005109/14

lill-Kunsill

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(17 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: Il-persuni b'diżabilità — impjiegi fl-istituzzjonijiet tal-UE

Ħafna Stati Membri għandhom politika tal-impjiegi bbażata fuq kwota obbligatorja ta’ impjiegi li s-soltu tkun stabbilita f’leġiżlazzjoni speċifika dwar it-tħaddim jew il-promozzjoni tat-tħaddim ta’ persuni b’diżabilità. Skont tali leġiżlazzjoni, l-impjegaturi huma obbligati jkollhom ċertu proporzjon ta’ persuni b’diżabilità fost il-persunal tagħhom u huma biss dawk il-persuni b'diżabilità li jkunu rreġistrati u li jissodisfaw il-kriterji tal-eliġibilità li jistgħu jgħoddu bħala parti minn din il-kwota. Dan jiżgura r-rieda ta' pajjiżi li jintegraw u jipprovdu opportunitajiet indaqs għall-persuni b’diżabilità.

Il-Kunsill għandu xi statistika dwar l-għadd totali u l-persentaġġ ta’ persuni b’diżabilità impjegati fil-Kunsill?

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-005110/14

lill-Kunsill

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(17 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: Il-persuni b'diżabilità — impjiegi fl-istituzzjonijiet tal-UE

Ħafna Stati Membri għandhom politika tal-impjiegi bbażata fuq kwota obbligatorja ta’ impjiegi li s-soltu tkun stabbilita f’leġiżlazzjoni speċifika dwar it-tħaddim jew il-promozzjoni tat-tħaddim ta’ persuni b’diżabilità. Skont tali leġiżlazzjoni, l-impjegaturi huma obbligati jkollhom ċertu proporzjon ta’ persuni b’diżabilità fost il-persunal tagħhom u huma biss dawk il-persuni b'diżabilità li jkunu rreġistrati u li jissodisfaw il-kriterji tal-eliġibilità li jistgħu jgħoddu bħala parti minn din il-kwota. Dan jiżgura r-rieda ta' pajjiżi li jintegraw u jipprovdu opportunitajiet indaqs għall-persuni b’diżabilità.

Il-Kunsill għandu politika ta' kwota simili fis-seħħ għall-impjieg ta' persuni b’diżabilità? Jekk le, jipprevedi l-implimentazzjoni ta' tali politika ta' reklutaġġ?

Tweġiba konġunta

(30 ta' Ġunju 2014)

Ir-Regolamenti tal-Persunal (135), adottati mill-Parlament Ewropew u l-Kunsill, jipprojbixxu d-diskriminazzjoni minħabba diżabilità. Madankollu, dawn ma jipprevedu l-ebda obbligu ġenerali li jkun hemm ċertu proporzjon ta' persuni b'diżabilità fost il-persunal tal-istituzzjonijiet tal-UE.

Il-Konvenzjoni tan-NU dwar id-Drittijiet ta' Persuni b'Diżabilità ilha tapplika għall-istituzzjonijiet tal-UE minn Jannar 2011. Konsegwentement, is-Segretarjat Ġenerali tal-Kunsill huwa involut fil-ġbir ta' data bl-għan li tiġi sorveljata s-sitwazzjoni tal-persuni b'diżabilità impjegati mill-Kunsill. Madankollu, f'dan l-istadju huwa m'għandux statistika komprensiva dwar in-numri totali u l-perċentwali ta' persunal b'diżabilitajiet.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005109/14

to the Council

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(17 April 2014)

Subject: People with disabilities — employment in EU institutions

Many Member States have an employment policy based on a mandatory employment quota, usually set out in specific legislation on employing or promoting the employment of people with disabilities. According to such legislation, employers are obliged to have a certain proportion of people with disabilities among their staff and only registered people with disabilities fulfilling the eligibility criteria can count towards this quota. This ensures the willingness of countries to integrate and provide equal opportunities for people with disabilities.

Does the Council have any statistics on the total number and percentage of people with disabilities who are employed in the Council?

Question for written answer E-005110/14

to the Council

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(17 April 2014)

Subject: People with disabilities — employment in EU institutions

Many Member States have an employment policy based on a mandatory employment quota, usually set out in specific legislation on employing or promoting the employment of people with disabilities. According to such legislation, employers are obliged to have a certain proportion of people with disabilities among their staff and only registered people with disabilities fulfilling the eligibility criteria can count towards this quota. This ensures the willingness of countries to integrate and provide equal opportunities for people with disabilities.

Does the Council have a similar quota policy in place for the employment of people with disabilities? If not, does it envisage implementing such a recruitment policy?

Joint reply

(30 June 2014)

The Staff Regulations (136), adopted by the European Parliament and the Council, prohibit discrimination on grounds of disability. However, they do not provide for any general obligation to have a certain proportion of persons with disabilities among the staff of the EU institutions.

The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has applied to the EU institutions since January 2011. Consequently, the General Secretariat of the Council is engaged in the collection of data with a view to monitoring the situation of persons with disabilities employed by the Council. However, at this stage it does not have comprehensive statistics on the total numbers and percentage of staff with disabilities.

(Magyar változat)

Írásbeli választ igénylő kérdés E-005161/14

a Bizottság számára

Kovács Béla (NI)

(2014. április 17.)

Tárgy: Szén-dioxid helyett jöjjön a rákkeltő korom

Az EU folyamatosan szigorítja a gépjárműmotorokra vonatkozó környezetvédelmi határértékeket. Így ezek a motorok egyre kevesebb szén-dioxidot bocsájtanak ki. Csakhogy megjelent a kipufogógázokban a mikroszemcsés korom (PM2,5–PM10), amit a hagyományos régi motorok egyáltalán nem bocsájtottak ki.

Tudományos vizsgálatok igazolják, hogy a mikroszemcsés korom rákkeltő, felelős a stroke, tüdőbetegségek, COPD kialakulásáért. Ugyanakkor a szén-dioxid lényegében ártalmatlan, a növények növekedését elősegítő gáz, melynek minimális üvegház-hatása is vitatott.

Miért kellett egy ártalmatlan anyag kibocsájtásának csökkentése érdekében egy súlyosan ártalmas mesterséges anyagot rászabadítani az európai polgárokra?

Az egészséghez és egészséges környezethez való jog okán tájékoztatják-e az uniós polgárokat arról, hogy minden korszerűnek és környezetbarátnak titulált autó megvásárlásával a maguk és szeretteik halálát is siettetik?

Ha a Bizottság a cigaretták esetében előírta a feliratozási kötelezettséget, úgy az autókon, illetve azok műszaki dokumentációin miért nem kell feltüntetni, hogy milyen nem várt ártalmakat okoznak?

Janez Potočnik válasza a Bizottság nevében

(2014. július 7.)

A Bizottság tudatában van a szálló por egészségügyi hatásainak. Ezzel szemben nincs tudomása annak bizonyítékáról, hogy a motor által kibocsátott részecskék (PM2,5 és PM10) tömege növekedett volna amiatt, hogy a közúti járművek motorjait módosították a CO2-kibocsátás csökkentésére vonatkozó követelményeknek való megfelelés érdekében. A hagyományos szennyezőanyagok legutóbbi ellenőrzése nyomán (Euro 5 kibocsátási szabvány [könnyűgépjárművek, pl. személygépkocsik számára] (137) és EURO V kibocsátási szabvány [nehézgépjárművek, pl. tehergépkocsik számára] (138)) a megengedett porkibocsátás egy 30-as faktorral (vagyis 97%-kal) csökkent az 1990. évi dízelüzemű modellekhez viszonyítva. Az Euro 5 benzinüzemű személygépkocsiknak ugyanazon porkibocsátási határértékeknek kell megfelelniük, mint a dízelüzeműeknek.

A dízelüzemű személygépkocsikkal kapcsolatos legfőbb megoldatlan probléma a könnyűgépjárművek nitrogén-oxid (NOx) kibocsátása, ahol a valódi üzem értékei sokkal rosszabbak a laboratóriumi méréseken alapuló típus-jóváhagyási vizsgálat mutatóinál. A CARS 2020 közleményben (139) és a Tiszta levegőt Európának programban (140) a Bizottság elkötelezte magát a kérdés megoldására azáltal, hogy az Euro 6 szabvány végrehajtásához új vizsgálati ciklust vezet be.

A Tiszta levegőt Európának programban az is szerepel, hogy a járművek környezetszennyezési értékeik alapján történő megjelölésének lehetőségeit is megvizsgálják.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005161/14

to the Commission

Béla Kovács (NI)

(17 April 2014)

Subject: A welcome for carcinogenic soot, to take the place of carbon dioxide

The EU constantly adopts more stringent environmental limit values applicable to the engines of motor vehicles. As a result, engines emit less and less carbon dioxide. There is a catch, however: particulates (PM2.5-PM10) have appeared in exhaust gases which the old, traditional engines did not generally emit.

Scientific research shows these soot particulates to be carcinogenic and to be responsible for strokes and the development of lung diseases and COPD. On the other hand, carbon dioxide is a basically harmless gas which promotes plant growth and whose minimal greenhouse gas effect is also controversial.

Why, in order to reduce emissions of a harmless substance, has it been necessary to let loose upon European citizens a seriously harmful artificial substance?

In view of the right to health and a healthy environment, are European citizens informed that every car that is bought which is described as up-to-date and environmentally sound accelerates their death and that of their loved ones?

If, in the case of cigarettes, the Commission imposed a labelling requirement, why is it not necessary to indicate on cars or in their technical documentation what unexpected harm they cause?

Answer given by Mr Potočnik on behalf of the Commission

(7 July 2014)

The Commission is indeed aware of the health implications of particulate matter. However, it is not aware of evidence that engine modifications to comply with requirements to reduce CO2 emissions from motor vehicles have resulted in higher engine emissions of particulate mass (PM2.5 and PM10). The latest controls on conventional pollutants (emission standards Euro 5 (for light duty vehicles like cars) (141) and EURO V (for heavy duty vehicles like trucks) (142)) have reduced the allowed emission of particulate matter by a factor of 30 (i.e. by 97%) compared to 1990 diesel models. Euro 5 gasoline cars must comply with the same PM emission limit as diesels.

The main outstanding pollution problem related to diesels concerns emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) from light-duty vehicles, where the real-life performance is much worse than the indications from the laboratory-based type-approval test. In the Cars 2020 Communication (143) and the Clean Air Programme for Europe (144), the Commission has committed to resolving this problem by introducing a new test cycle for the implementation of Euro 6.

The Clean Air Programme for Europe indeed states that options for labelling vehicles according to their pollution performance will be explored.

(Ελληνική έκδοση)

Ερώτηση με αίτημα γραπτής απάντησης E-005216/14

προς την Επιτροπή

Theodoros Skylakakis (ALDE)

(23 Απριλίου 2014)

Θέμα: Τροπολογία σχετικά με την χορήγηση δανείων στα ελληνικά κόμματα

Από τον ισολογισμό του κόμματος της Νέας Δημοκρατίας του έτους 2013 προκύπτει ότι το κόμμα αυτό — που έχει ως πρόεδρο τον νυν πρωθυπουργό της Ελλάδος κ. Σαμαρά — έλαβε το 2013 νέα δάνεια ύψους 14 εκατ. ευρώ, με αποτέλεσμα τα συνολικά του δάνεια να φθάσουν τα 160 εκ. ευρώ. Τα νέα αυτά δάνεια είναι βέβαιο ότι δεν μπορούν να εξυπηρετηθούν, όπως προκύπτει από απάντηση του Επιτρόπου κ. Αλμούνια σε ερώτησή μου αλλά έχει ομολογήσει και το ίδιο το κόμμα της Νέας Δημοκρατίας στην εισηγητική έκθεση τροπολογίας που είχε καταθέσει ο τότε Γενικός της Γραμματέας το 2012, στην οποία ζητούσε ρύθμιση των σχετικών δανείων δια νόμου. Παράλληλα τον Απρίλιο του 2013 η κυβέρνηση πέρασε ειδική τροπολογία με την οποία δεν θεωρείται απιστία η χορήγηση δανείων στα κόμματα, ακόμα και αν αυτά είναι δεδομένο ότι δεν μπορούν να εξυπηρετηθούν. Χορηγήθηκε δηλαδή εμμέσως αμνηστία στους τραπεζίτες που έδωσαν τα σχετικά δάνεια και στους ηθικούς αυτουργούς των δανείων αυτών. Ερωτάται η Επιτροπή, με την ιδιότητά της ως μέρους της τρόικας:

Πότε πληροφορήθηκε με οποιονδήποτε τρόπο την ύπαρξη της τροπολογίας αυτής του Απριλίου του 2013;

Συμφωνεί με το περιεχόμενό της, με δεδομένες τις διαβεβαιώσεις που έχει δώσει ο Επίτροπος κ. Ρεν από το 2011 σε απάντηση της ερώτησής μου (E-011048/2011), σύμφωνα με τις οποίες για να αποτραπεί κάθε ενδεχόμενο ηθικού κινδύνου που σχετίζεται με το πρόγραμμα για την Ελλάδα και την ανακεφαλαιοποίηση των ελληνικών τραπεζών, θα ληφθούν μέτρα για να διασφαλιστεί η τήρηση των αρχών της δίκαιης μεταχείρισης, της αμεροληψίας και της ανεξαρτησίας από πολιτικές επιρροές;

Απάντηση του κ. Kallas εξ ονόματος της Επιτροπής

(10 Ιουλίου 2014)

Η Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή θα ήθελε να επιστήσει την προσοχή του κ. βουλευτή στο γεγονός ότι, στο πλαίσιο της πρώτης αναθεώρησης του δεύτερου προγράμματος οικονομικής προσαρμογής για την Ελλάδα, τοποθετήθηκαν εντολοδόχοι παρακολούθησης στις τέσσερις κεντρικές ελληνικές τράπεζες. Ειδικότερα, οι εντολοδόχοι παρακολούθησης για την Τράπεζα Πειραιώς, την Alpha Bank και την Εθνική Τράπεζα της Ελλάδος διορίστηκαν στις 16 Ιανουαρίου 2013. Ο εντολοδόχος παρακολούθησης για τη Eurobank διορίστηκε στις 22 Φεβρουαρίου 2013. Οι εντολοδόχοι παρακολούθησης αμείβονται από την τράπεζα, με την οποία έχουν υπογράψει επίσημα σύμβαση, αλλά εργάζονται για την Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή. Τα καθήκοντα των εντολοδόχων παρακολούθησης είναι να παρακολουθούν την αναδιάρθρωση και την εταιρική διακυβέρνηση των τραπεζών, να εποπτεύουν τις πολιτικές και τις πρακτικές δανειοδότησης των τραπεζών, συμπεριλαμβανομένων των συναλλαγών με τα συνδεδεμένα μέρη και τα πολιτικά κόμματα, και να υποβάλλουν εκθέσεις σχετικά με κάθε δραστηριότητα η οποία δεν είναι σύμφωνη με τους όρους της αγοράς. Στο πλαίσιο αυτό, οι τράπεζες υποχρεούνται να χορηγούν δάνεια σε εμπορική βάση και υπό συνθήκες ανταγωνισμού. Η Επιτροπή επιβεβαιώνει ότι, σύμφωνα με τις διαθέσιμες πληροφορίες, καμία από τις τέσσερις κεντρικές τράπεζες δεν έχει χορηγήσει νέο δάνειο σε πολιτικά κόμματα από τη στιγμή που ανέλαβαν τα καθήκοντά τους οι εντολοδόχοι παρακολούθησης. Οι ανωτέρω ρυθμίσεις συνάδουν με την απάντηση του Αντιπροέδρου Rehn στην οποία αναφέρεστε.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005216/14

to the Commission

Theodoros Skylakakis (ALDE)

(23 April 2014)

Subject: Amendment on the granting of loans to Greek political parties

New Democracy’s balance sheets for 2013 show that in 2013 this party — whose President is the current Prime Minister of Greece, Mr Samaras — received new loans totalling EUR 14 million; this means that it now has total loans of EUR 160 million. These new loans can certainly not be serviced, as is clear from the reply given by Commissioner Almunia to a question I had tabled, and the New Democracy party admitted as much in the explanatory statement to an amendment tabled by its then General Secretary in 2012 in which he calls for the loans to be settled by law.

Then, in April 2013, the government adopted a special amendment proposing that lending to parties, even where it is certain that they will be unable to service them, should not be regarded as fraud. In other words, the bankers who granted the loans and the instigators of these loans have indirectly been granted an amnesty.

In view of the above, will the Commission, in its capacity as part of the Troika, state:

When was it informed — by any means — of the existence of this amendment of April 2013?

Does it agree with its content, in view of the assurances given to me by Commissioner Rehn in 2011 in answer to my question (E-011048/2011) stating that, in order to prevent any possibility of moral hazard associated with the programme for Greece and the recapitalisation of Greek banks, measures would be taken to ensure that the principles of fairness, impartiality and independence from political influence were observed?

Answer given by Mr Kallas on behalf of the Commission

(10 July 2014)

The European Commission would like to draw the attention of the honourable Member of the European Parliament to the fact that in the context of the first review under the second economic adjustment programme for Greece monitoring trustees were placed in the four core Greek banks. In particular, the monitoring trustees for Piraeus, Alpha and National Bank of Greece were appointed on 16 January 2013. The monitoring trustee for Eurobank was appointed on 22 February 2013. Monitoring trustees are paid by the bank and have formally a contract with the bank but they work for the EC. The tasks of the monitoring trustees are to monitor the restructuring and the corporate governance of banks, oversee the lending policies and practices of the banks including the transactions with the related parties and the political parties and report about any activity which is not in line with market terms and conditions. In this context, the banks are required to grant loans on a commercial and arm's length basis. The Commission confirms that, according to the information available, there has been no new loan granted to political parties by the four core banks since the monitoring trustees took up their duties. The above arrangements are consistent with the response of Vice-President Rehn that you refer to.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005234/14

to the Council

Charles Tannock (ECR)

(23 April 2014)

Subject: Blood minerals in North Korea

Although the appalling state of human rights in the DPRK, or North Korea, is notorious throughout the world, the recent UN Commission of Inquiry (COI) report highlighted one particularly egregious phenomenon: the existence of slave labour in prison camps, which are thought to house up to 200 000 inmates, among them thousands of children. The report states that in the prison camps ‘all inmates are subjected to forced labour’ for over twelve hours a day, regardless of their physical or emotional well-being, and that ‘deadly work accidents frequently occur as a result of the combination of the prisoners’ dire physical condition and the lack of safety measures’. The report further states that the actions of the state in the political prison camps, which include extermination, enslavement, torture, rape and religious and gender-based persecution, constitute crimes against humanity.

A less well-known aspect of the camps is that many of them host mines which produce coal, magnetite and other minerals. Given the overwhelming evidence that such mines are operated using slave labour, and that the inmates are subject to appalling conditions frequently resulting in severe injury or death, it comes as a surprise to many that importing such minerals from North Korea is technically not forbidden under the existing sanctions regime. It can be argued that EU policy is therefore tacitly supporting the trade of ‘blood minerals’, which should be treated in the same way as ‘blood diamonds’ in West Africa. Banning their trade would also cut off a valuable source of revenue to the government and its nuclear weapons programme.

Reply

(8 July 2014)

The Council is aware of the report by the UN Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), including the parts related to prison camps. In fact, the EU co-initiated the UN Human Rights Council Resolution that, in March 2013, established the said Commission to investigate the systematic, widespread and grave violations of human rights in the DPRK, including the violations associated with prison camps.

The EU currently has a regime of restrictive measures in place with respect to the DPRK that implements the sanctions imposed by the United Nations in response to the DPRK’s weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programmes and includes additional restrictive measures reinforcing the UN measures. In February 2013, the Council imposed a ban on trade in gold, precious metals and diamonds with the Government of the DPRK, its public bodies and the Central Bank of the DPRK, or persons or entities acting on their behalf or under their direction. New EU restrictive measures are currently not under consideration.

(Deutsche Fassung)

Anfrage zur schriftlichen Beantwortung P-005254/14

an die Kommission

Eva Lichtenberger (Verts/ALE)

(23. April 2014)

Betrifft: Urteil des Gerichtshofs zur Richtlinie über die Vorratsdatenspeicherung/Artikel 15 der Richtlinie über den Schutz der Privatsphäre in der elektronischen Kommunikation

Teilt die Kommission die Auffassung, dass alle Rechtsvorschriften der Mitgliedstaaten über Datenspeicherung Artikel 15 der Richtlinie über den Schutz der Privatsphäre in der elektronischen Kommunikation (2002/58/EG, zuletzt im Jahr 2009 geändert) berücksichtigen müssen, entsprechend dem Urteil des Gerichtshofs zur Vorratsdatenspeicherung?

Teilt die Kommission daher die Auffassung, dass alle nationalen Rechtsvorschriften über Datenspeicherung nicht verhältnismäßig sind und daher aufgehoben werden müssen?

Antwort von Frau Malmström im Namen der Kommission

(17. Juli 2014)

Die nationalen Rechtsvorschriften der Mitgliedstaaten werden durch das Urteil des Gerichtshofs der Europäischen Union (EuGH) in den verbundenen Rechtssachen C-293/12 und C-594/12, in dem die Richtlinie zur Vorratsdatenspeicherung für ungültig erklärt wird, nicht unmittelbar betroffen.

Nach EU-Recht können die Mitgliedstaaten in Ermangelung einer Richtlinie zur Vorratsdatenspeicherung gemäß Artikel 15 Absatz 1 der Datenschutzrichtlinie für elektronische Kommunikation (145) ihre Regelungen zur Vorratsdatenspeicherung beibehalten oder neue derartige Regelungen einführen. Artikel 15 Absatz 1 der Datenschutzrichtlinie für elektronische Kommunikation ermöglicht es den Mitgliedstaaten, durch Rechtsvorschriften vorzusehen, dass Daten unter anderem zur Verhütung, Ermittlung, Feststellung und Verfolgung von Straftaten während einer begrenzten Zeit aufbewahrt werden, sofern eine solche Beschränkung in einer demokratischen Gesellschaft notwendig, angemessen und verhältnismäßig ist. Derartige Maßnahmen müssen mit den allgemeinen Grundsätzen des Unionsrechts, einschließlich der Grundrechte, vereinbar sein. Solange diese Kriterien erfüllt sind, stehen die nationalen Rechtsvorschriften der Mitgliedstaaten über die Vorratsdatenspeicherung mit dem EU-Recht in Einklang. Jeder Mitgliedstaat muss sorgfältig prüfen, ob eine Änderung der nationalen Rechtsvorschriften notwendig ist.

(English version)

Question for written answer P-005254/14

to the Commission

Eva Lichtenberger (Verts/ALE)

(23 April 2014)

Subject: Decision of the Court of Justice on the Data Retention Directive/Article 15 of the directive on privacy and electronic communications

Does the Commission agree that all Member State laws on data retention have to reflect Article 15 of the directive on privacy and electronic communications (2002/58/EC, last amended in 2009), in line with the ruling of the Court of Justice on the Data Retention Directive?

Does the Commission agree, therefore, that any national data retention laws are not proportionate and must be repealed?

Answer given by Ms Malmström on behalf of the Commission

(17 July 2014)

Member States' national legislation is not directly concerned by the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Joined Cases C-293/12 and C-594/12 invalidating the Data Retention Directive.

Under EC law, in the absence of an EU Data Retention Directive, Member States may still maintain or set up new data retention schemes, under the conditions of Article 15(1) of the e-privacy Directive (146). Article 15(1) of the e-Privacy Directive allows Member States to adopt legislative measures providing for the retention of data for a limited period justified on the grounds including prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, provided that such a restriction is a necessary, appropriate and proportionate measure within a democratic society. Such measures must be in accordance with the general principles of Union law, including fundamental rights. Member States' national legislation on data retention remains compatible with EC law to the extent that it complies with these criteria. Each Member State has to carefully assess whether there is a need to change its national legislation.

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-005284/14

lill-Kummissjoni

Claudette Abela Baldacchino (S&D)

(23 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: Il-ġeneru u l-intrapriżi ta' daqs żgħir u medju (SMEs)

Hemm 20.7 miljun SME fl-UE, li jimpjegaw iktar minn 65 % tal-forza tax-xogħol eżistenti tas-settur privat, u l-SMEs huma l-iktar intrapriżi innovattivi bl-aħjar rendiment f'termini ta' ħolqien ta' impjiegi u tkabbir ekonomiku. L-SMEs jeħtieġu mhux biex is-simplifikazzjoni amministrattivi, imma wkoll aċċess aħjar għall-finanzi, aċċess għall-informazzjoni, ħiliet u għarfien, u appoġġ għall-isforzi innovattivi tagħhom.

Tweġiba mogħtija mis-Sur Tajani f'isem il-Kummissjoni

(27 ta' Ġunju 2014)

Il-Kummissjoni tirreferi lill-Onorevoli Membru għat-tweġiba tagħha għall-mistoqsija E-4603/2012 dwar dejta dwar in-nisa u l-intraprenditorija.

Barra minn hekk, studju li l-għan tiegħu parzjalment kien li tinkiseb dejta statistika dwar l-intraprendituri nisa għal pajjiżi parteċipanti kollha tal-COSME (147) jinsab għaddej bħalissa. Ir-riżultati se jkunu lesti fil-ħarifa tal-2014.

Fir-rigward ta’ programmi speċifiċi biex jiżdiedu u jiġu appoġġjati l-intraprendituri nisa, il-Kummissjoni tirreferi lill-Onorevoli Membru għat-tweġiba tagħha għall-mistoqsija E-2616/2014.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005284/14

to the Commission

Claudette Abela Baldacchino (S&D)

(23 April 2014)

Subject: Gender and SMEs

There are 20.7 million SMEs in the EU, which employ over 65% of the existing private-sector workforce, and SMEs are among the most innovatory enterprises, with the best performance in terms of job creation and economic growth. SMEs need not just administrative simplification, but also better access to finance, access to information, skills and knowledge, and support for their innovative efforts.

Answer given by Mr Tajani on behalf of the Commission

(27 June 2014)

The Commission would refer the Honourable Member to its reply to Question E-4603/2012 on data on women in entrepreneurship.

In addition, a study aimed in part at obtaining statistical data on women entrepreneurs for all COSME (148) participating countries is currently underway. The results will be ready in autumn 2014.

With respect to specific programmes to increase and support women entrepreneurs, the Commission would refer the Honourable Member to its reply given to Question E-2616/2014.

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-005285/14

lill-Kummissjoni

Claudette Abela Baldacchino (S&D)

(23 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: Il-miri tal-iskart ta' tagħmir elettriku u elettroniku domestiku

It-Times of Malta fis-17 ta' April 2014 irrappurtat li “Malta hi waħda mill-10 pajjiżi fiż-Żona Ekonomika Ewropea li naqset milli tilħaq mira tal-UE dwar il-ġbir ta' skart ta’ tagħmir elettriku u elettroniku. Id-Direttiva tal-UE tistabbilixxi mira ta' ġbir ta' mill-inqas 4 kg ta' skart ta' tagħmir elettriku u elettroniku mid-djar għal kull abitant li kellha tintlaħaq mill-pajjiżi kollha sa mhux aktar tard mill-2009. L-Eurostat din il-ġimgħa rrappurtat li, b'kollox, 10 pajjiżi naqsu milli jilħqu l-mira ta' ġbir ta' 4 kg għal kull abitant (il-Greċja, Spanja, Ċipru, il-Latvja, il-Litwanja, l-Ungerija, Malta, il-Polonja, ir-Rumanija, is-Slovakkja), li minnhom tliet pajjiżi (il-Greċja, is-Slovakkja, l-Ungerija) kienu ferm viċin li jilħqu l-mira (b'3.9 kg għal kull abitant)”. X'inhuma l-fehmiet tal-Kummissjoni dwar dan ir-rapport?

Tweġiba mogħtija mis-Sur Potočnik f'isem il-Kummissjoni

(14 ta' Lulju 2014)

Ir-rapport imsemmi mill-Onorevoli Membru huwa bbażat fuq il-ġbir ta' dejta tal-WEEE li l-Istati Membri rrappurtaw lill-Kummissjoni għas-snin 2007, 2008, 2009 u 2010 abbażi tad-Deċiżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 2004/249/KE (149). Ir-rapport sħiħ huwa disponibbli fil-websajt tal-Eurostat (150). Ir-raġunijiet għall-prestazzjoni differenti tal-Istati Membri jvarjaw u jirriflettu differenzi fil-livelli ta' konsum tal-EEE kif ukoll prestazzjoni differenti tal-iskemi għall-ġbir tal-WEEE li hemm fis-seħħ. Fejn meħtieġ, il-Kummissjoni tindirizza l-Istati Membri individwalment u titlobhom jagħtu spjegazzjonijiet għala naqsu milli jikkonformaw mal-miri jew rekwiżiti oħra fil-liġi tal-UE.

Ir-reviżjoni tad-Direttiva WEEE (151) stabbilixxiet miri għall-ġbir abbażi tal-perċentwali ta’ EEE li jitqiegħed fis-suq minflok ċifra bbażata fuq massa unika. Il-metalli prezzjużi u l-elementi terrestri rari li jinsabu fil-WEEE jagħmlu r-riċiklaġġ tiegħu dejjem aktar vallapena minn alternattivi oħra inqas favorevoli għall-ambjent.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005285/14

to the Commission

Claudette Abela Baldacchino (S&D)

(23 April 2014)

Subject: Household WEEE targets

The Times of Malta reported on 17 April 2014 that ‘Malta is one of 10 countries in the European Economic Area which failed to meet an EU target for the collection of electrical and electronic waste (WEEE). The EU Directive set a collection target of a minimum of 4 kg per inhabitant of WEEE from households to be achieved by all countries in 2009 at the latest. Altogether, 10 countries failed to meet the collection target of 4 kg per inhabitant (Greece, Spain, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia), of which three countries (Greece, Slovakia, Hungary) were very close to the target (with 3.9 kg/inhabitant), Eurostat reported this week.’

What are the Commission’s views on this report?

Answer given by Mr Potočnik on behalf of the Commission

(14 July 2014)

The report referred to by the Honourable Member is based on the WEEE collection data that Member States reported to the Commission for the years 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 on the basis of Commission Decision 2004/249/EC (152). The full report is available on the Eurostat website (153). The reasons for the different performance of Member States vary, reflecting differences in EEE consumption levels as well as different performance of the WEEE collection schemes in place. Where necessary, the Commission approaches individual Member States asking them to give explanations for failing to achieve compliance with targets or other requirements in EC law.

The revision of the WEEE Directive (154) has now established collection targets based on the percentage of EEE put on the market rather than a single weight based figure. The valuable metals and rare earths contained in WEEE make it increasingly profitable to recycle rather than disposing of in less environmentally optimal ways.

(Version française)

Question avec demande de réponse écrite E-005304/14

à la Commission

Gilles Pargneaux (S&D)

(23 avril 2014)

Objet: Plan d'action européen contre l'obsolescence programmée des produits

Le Comité économique et social européen a adopté, le 17 octobre 2013, un avis intitulé «Pour une consommation plus durable: la vie des produits de l'industrie et l'information du consommateur pour une confiance renouvelée».

Alors que l'Union devrait défendre le principe de l'écoconception des produits pour favoriser leur durabilité et combattre leur obsolescence, quelles actions la Commission compte-t-elle mettre en œuvre pour lutter contre l'obsolescence programmée des produits?

Réponse donnée par M. Barnier au nom de la Commission

(2 juillet 2014)

L'auteur de la question est invité à consulter les précédentes réponses aux questions parlementaires dans le domaine de l'obsolescence programmée, notamment les réponses P-5252/14, E-3441/13 et E-6339/13.

La Commission lutte actuellement contre les pratiques dites d'obsolescence programmée via la directive sur l'écoconception (155), qui permet d'établir des dispositions en faveur de la réparabilité et l'allongement de la durée de vie des produits et équipements et de fixer des exigences d'écoconception contraignantes dès que les répercussions sur l'environnement s'avèrent marquées (156). Des exigences en matière de conception des produits ont également été intégrées dans la refonte de la directive relative aux déchets d'équipements électriques et électroniques (DEEE) (157).

Plus généralement, la directive 1999/44/CE (158) donne en outre aux consommateurs le droit à une garantie de deux ans minimum. Si un article se révèle défectueux ou s'il ne fonctionne pas comme annoncé, le vendeur doit le réparer ou le remplacer sans frais. Les pratiques commerciales consistant à ne pas informer un consommateur que le produit qu'il a acheté est reconnu comme ayant été conçu avec une durée de vie limitée pourraient être considérées comme déloyales, au sens de la directive 2005/29/CE (159).

Les labels écologiques et d'autres mesures volontaires liées aux produits peuvent aussi jouer un rôle plus important dans la prise en compte des exigences environnementales sur l'ensemble du cycle de vie des produits, des processus et des services.

Afin de favoriser une consommation plus pérenne, la Commission a déclaré qu'elle allait réfléchir à des mesures augmentant la longévité des biens de consommation, notamment une aide aux services de réparation et de maintenance (160). Plus récemment, des actions ont été réalisées dans ce domaine, comme l'examen de l'efficacité des matières premières pour l'écoconception, au cours duquel la durée de vie du produit a été analysée (161). La Commission a également lancé une étude sur la durabilité des produits (162) en vue d'élaborer des exigences de durabilité.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005304/14

to the Commission

Gilles Pargneaux (S&D)

(23 April 2014)

Subject: European action plan against the planned obsolescence of products

On 17 October 2013 the European Economic and Social Committee adopted an opinion entitled ‘Towards more sustainable consumption: industrial product lifetimes and restoring trust through consumer information.’

Given that the EU should uphold the principle of eco-designed products to promote their sustainability and combat their obsolescence, what measures does the Commission intend to take to combat the planned obsolescence of products?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(2 July 2014)

The Honourable Member is invited to consult previous answers to parliamentary questions concerning the area of planned obsolescence, inter alia P-5252/14, E-3441/13 and E-6339/13.

The Commission is already combating such planned obsolescence practices via the Ecodesign Directive (163), which enables requirements to be made for reparability and the life-time extension of products and equipment, and enables mandatory ecodesign requirements to be set whenever environmental impacts are found to be significant (164). Product design requirements are also included in the recast WEEE Directive (165).

In addition, overall, Directive 1999/44/EC (166) gives consumers the right to a minimum two-year guarantee. Where an item turns out to be faulty or does not function as advertised, the seller must repair or replace it free of charge. If a product is proven to have been designed with a limited lifetime and the consumer is not informed about this fact, it could be considered as an unfair commercial practice under Directive 2005/29/EC (167).

Ecolabels and other voluntary product-related voluntary measures may also have the potential to play a more important role, to enable environmental requirements to be taken into account over the whole life cycle of products, processes and services.

To promote more sustainable consumption, the Commission has stated that it will consider taking measures to make consumer goods more durable, including support for repair and maintenance services (168). More recently, related activities include an examination of material efficiency for ecodesign where product lifetime was one area analysed (169). The Commission also recently launched a product durability study (170) to develop durability requirements.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005324/14

to the Commission

Emer Costello (S&D)

(23 April 2014)

Subject: Natural catastrophe insurance markets and homes at risk of flooding and storm damage

Further to its answer of 17 January 2013 to my Question P-011023/2012, what action is the Commission now considering taking on foot of the public consultation on the Green Paper on the prevention and insurance of natural and man-made disasters, most notably to address the situation of homes at risk of flooding and storm damage?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(14 July 2014)

The Commission set out its overall strategy for disaster risk reduction in the Commission’s Communication of 8 April 2014 on the post 2015 Hyogo framework for action: managing risks to achieve resilience (171). The Commission is still analysing possible follow-up actions on the Green Paper on the insurance of natural and man-made disasters (172). In doing so, the Commission will carefully consider the views expressed by Honourable Members in the European Parliament’s Resolution of 5 February 2014 on the insurance of natural and man-made disasters (173).

(Versiunea în limba română)

Întrebarea cu solicitare de răspuns scris E-005355/14

adresată Comisiei

Vasilica Viorica Dăncilă (S&D)

(23 aprilie 2014)

Subiect: Jocurile de noroc online

Pe piața internă a Uniunii Europene s-au dezvoltat noi tehnologii ale informației, precum și activități economice nereglementate corespunzător. Popularitatea jocurilor de noroc online a crescut exponențial în ultimii ani.

Acest sector este caracterizat în prezent prin existența unei importante piețe negre, estimându-se că un procentaj destul de mare dintre site-urile care promovează online jocuri de noroc nu dețin licențe.

Jocurile de noroc online ar putea avea drept consecințe nu numai lipsa protecției consumatorilor, ci și fraude foarte mari.

În acest sens, ar fi Comisia de acord cu ideea că este necesar să se ia în acest sector măsuri care să ducă la eliminarea produselor sau serviciilor ilegale sau neautorizate și, în același timp, să protejeze consumatorii?

Răspuns dat de dl Barnier în numele Comisiei

(17 iunie 2014)

Comisia împărtășește preocupările distinsei membre cu privire la proliferarea serviciilor ilegale de jocuri de noroc online. În conformitate cu jurisprudența Curții de Justiție, având în vedere lipsa unei armonizări, statele membre sunt libere să își stabilească propriile obiective de politică în materie de jocuri de noroc. Cu toate acestea, Comisia se angajează să sprijine eforturile statelor membre de a asigura un nivel ridicat de protecție a consumatorilor împotriva site-urilor internet ilegale. În 2012, Comisia a instituit un grup de experți privind serviciile de jocuri de noroc, care reunește autoritățile de reglementare din toate statele membre, în scopul de a spori cooperarea dintre ele și a stimula schimbul de bune practici în privința combaterii ofertelor de jocuri de noroc ilegale.

De asemenea, Comisia este conștientă de riscurile deosebite legate de protejarea drepturilor consumatorilor și de fraudă care sunt asociate cu jocurile de noroc online, în special când acestea nu sunt reglementate în mod corespunzător. Comisia ia măsuri pentru a aborda aceste riscuri, în conformitate cu comunicarea sa din 2012 intitulată „Către un cadru european global pentru jocurile de noroc online”. În vederea consolidării protecției consumatorilor, mai târziu în cursul acestui an, Comisia va prezenta două recomandări: una privind protecția consumatorilor de jocuri de noroc online și alta privind publicitatea responsabilă a serviciilor de jocuri de noroc. În ceea ce privește combaterea activităților frauduloase, Comisia a propus extinderea normelor UE de combatere a spălării banilor (care în prezent se aplică, în conformitate cu legislația UE, numai cazinourilor) pentru a cuprinde toate formele de jocuri de noroc. În plus, Comisia a avut un rol activ, în numele UE, în cadrul negocierilor privind proiectul de convenție a Consiliului Europei privind manipularea competițiilor sportive și pregătește, de asemenea, o inițiativă proprie în acest domeniu.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005355/14

to the Commission

Vasilica Viorica Dăncilă (S&D)

(23 April 2014)

Subject: Online gaming

The development of new information technologies, accompanied by unregulated economic activities on the EU internal market, has in recent years led to a massive increase in the popularity of online gaming.

Much of this activity is being carried out on an unauthorised basis and it is estimated that a substantial percentage of online gaming sites are unlicensed.

This could have serious consequences, including not only inadequate consumer protection but also massive fraud.

Would the Commission agree that it is therefore necessary to take action to remove illegal or unauthorised products or services from this sector and at the same time protect consumers?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(17 June 2014)

The Commission shares the Honourable Member's concerns about the proliferation of illegal online gambling services. In accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice, given the absence of harmonisation, Member States are free to set their own gambling policy objectives. Nevertheless, the Commission is committed to supporting their efforts to ensure a high level of consumer protection against illegal websites. In 2012, the Commission established an Expert Group on Gambling Services which brings together regulators from all Member States to enhance their cooperation and stimulate an exchange of best practice in combatting illegal gambling offers.

The Commission is also aware of the particular risks related to the safeguarding of consumers' rights and to fraud which are associated with online gambling, in particular where it is not adequately regulated. The Commission is taking measures to address these risks, in accordance with its 2012 Communication ‘Towards a comprehensive European framework on online gambling’. In order to enhance consumer protection, later this year, the Commission will issue two Recommendations: on the protection of consumers of online gambling and on responsible advertising of gambling services. With reference to the fight against fraudulent activities, the Commission has proposed to extend the EU anti-money laundering rules — currently only applicable under EC law to casinos — to all forms of gambling. In addition, the Commission took active part, on behalf of the EU, in the negotiation of the draft Council of Europe Convention on the Manipulation of Sports Competitions and is also preparing its own initiative in this area.

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-005357/14

lill-Kunsill

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(23 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: Traffikar tal-bnedmin

It-traffikar tal-bnedmin huwa reat u ksur serju tad-drittijiet tal-bniedem. Spiss huwa marbut mal-kriminalità organizzata u huwa meqjus bħala waħda mill-aktar attivitajiet kriminali fid-dinja li minnha jiġi ġġenerat il-profitt. Il-Kummissjoni tikkalkula li l-għadd ta' persuni traffikati lejn jew fi ħdan l-UE jammonta għal bosta mijiet ta' eluf kull sena. L-approċċ tal-Kummissjoni lejn it-traffikar jiffoka fuq il-prevenzjoni, il-prosekuzzjoni tal-kriminali u l-protezzjoni tal-vittmi. Dan jirrifletti fid-direttiva l-ġdida dwar it-traffikar tal-bnedmin, li ġiet adottata fil-21 ta' Marzu 2011. Din tistabbilixxi dispożizzjonijiet robusti dwar il-protezzjoni tal-vittmi u tappoġġja l-prinċipji li ma jingħatawx pieni għal reati żgħar u li tingħata assistenza mingħajr kundizzjonijiet.

Ir-Rapport intitolat “It-Traffikar tal-Persuni (TiP)” jiġi ppubblikat mill-Istati Uniti tal-Amerika kull sena. Il-pajjiżi kollha huma miġbura fi gradi differenti, bl-ewwel grad jinkludi dawk il-pajjiżi li l-gvernijiet tagħhom huma kompletament konformi mal-istandards mininimi fir-rigward tat-traffikar tal-bnedmin. Madankollu, hemm Stati Membri tal-UE li tpoġġew fit-tieni grad.

Il-Kunsill għandu xi pjanijiet biex tħejji rapport TiP proprja tagħha? Fir-rigward ta' din il-kwestjon, il-Kunsill iqis li għandu rwol proprju tiegħu fl-iffaċilitar u l-iskambju tal-aħjar prattiki bejn l-Istati Membri?

Tweġiba

(30 ta' Ġunju 2014)

Fil-laqgħat tal-Ministri u l-Uffiċjali Għolja l-Istati Uniti u l-Unjoni Ewropea jiddiskutu regolarment l-iżviluppi rigward il-ġlieda kontra t-traffikar tal-bnedmin. Ir-rapport annwali US TIP (Traffikar tal-Persuni) huwa kkunsidrat bħala sors ta' informazzjoni utli u ta' valur. Il-Kunsill qatt ma ddiskuta dwar pjani biex jitħejja r-rapport TIP tiegħu.

Fl-2009, il-Kunsill qabel li jistabbilixxi Netwerk Informali tal-UE ta' Relaturi Nazzjonali jew Mekkaniżmi Ekwivalenti dwar it-Traffikar tal-Bnedmin sabiex jiġi ffaċilitat l-iskambju tal-aħjar prattiki fir-rigward tal-ġlieda kontra t-traffikar tal-bnedmin. L-għan ewlieni ta' dan in-Netwerk huwa li jtejjeb il-fehim tal-fenomenu tat-traffikar tal-bnedmin u li l-Unjoni u l-Istati Membri tagħha jingħataw informazzjoni strateġika oġġettiva, affidabbli, komparabbli u aġġornata. In-Netwerk huwa miftuħ għall-istituzzjonijiet u l-aġenziji tal-UE kif ukoll għal istituzzjonijiet internazzjonali rilevanti bħan-NU.

F'konformità mal-Artikolu 19 tad-Direttiva 2011/36/UE tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-5 ta' April 2011 dwar il-prevenzjoni u l-ġlieda kontra t-traffikar tal-bnedmin u l-protezzjoni tal-vittmi tiegħu (174), Relaturi nazzjonali jew mekkaniżmi ekwivalenti huma responsabbli għall-monitoraġġ tal-implimentazzjoni ta' politika kontra t-traffikar fil-livell nazzjonali u għandhom rwol ewlieni fil-ġbir ta' data dwar it-traffikar kemm fil-livell nazzjonali u dak tal-UE. Il-kompiti ta' tali mekkaniżmi għandhom jinkludu t-twettiq ta' valutazzjonijiet dwar it-tendenzi tat-traffikar tal-bnedmin, it-tkejjil tar-riżultati tal-azzjonijiet ta' kontra t-traffikar, inkluż il-ġbir tal-istatistika b’kooperazzjoni mill-qrib mal-organizzazzjonijiet rilevanti tas-soċjetà ċivili attivi f’dan il-qasam, u r-rappurtaġġ. Il-Presidenza, b'kooperazzjoni mal-Kummissjoni, tikkoordina l-attivitajiet tan-netwerk u tippresjedi l-laqgħat. In-netwerk jiltaqa' bejn wieħed u ieħor kull sitt xhur, u l-Parlament Ewropew huwa mistieden jattendi dawn il-laqgħat.

Sabiex l-Istati Membri jikkontribwixxu għal strateġija tal-Unjoni kkoordinata u kkonsolidata f'dan il-qasam, huma jiffaċilitaw ukoll il-kompiti tal-koordinatur ta' kontra t-traffikar (ATC) billi jibagħtu informazzjoni rilevanti li abbażi tagħha l-ATC jikkontribwixxi għar-rappurtar li jsir mill-Kummissjoni kull sentejn dwar il-progress li jkun sar fil-ġlieda kontra t-traffikar tal-bnedmin.

Fl-aħħar nett, “L-Istrateġija tal-UE lejn il-Qerda tat-Traffikar tal-Bnedmin (2012‐2016) (175)”, segwita mill-Konklużjonijiet tal-Kunsill, adottati f'Ottubru 2012, tiffoka fuq miżuri speċifiċi li jappoġġaw u jikkomplementaw l-implimentazzjoni tal-leġislazzjoni tal-UE dwar it-traffikar tal-bnedmin.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005357/14

to the Council

Roberta Metsola (PPE)

(23 April 2014)

Subject: Trafficking in human beings

Trafficking in human beings is a serious crime and a gross violation of human rights. It is very often linked with organised crime and is considered as one of the most profitable criminal activities worldwide. The Commission estimates that the number of people trafficked to or within the EU amounts to several hundred thousand a year. The Commission’s approach to trafficking focuses on prevention, prosecution of criminals and protection of victims. This is reflected in the new directive on trafficking in human beings, which was adopted on 21 March 2011. It establishes robust provisions on victims’ protection and supports the principle of non-punishment for petty crimes and unconditional assistance.

The Trafficking in Persons (TiP) Report is published by the United States of America on a yearly basis. All countries are grouped in different tiers, with tier one being those countries whose governments fully comply with minimum standards in the trafficking of human beings. However, there are Member States which have been placed in the second tier.

Does the Council have any plans to prepare its own TiP report? Does the Council see a role for itself in facilitating the exchange of best practice between the Member States on this issue?

Reply

(30 June 2014)

The US and the European Union regularly discuss developments regarding combating trafficking in human beings at Ministers' and Senior Officials' meetings. The annual US TiP (Trafficking in Persons) report is considered to be a useful and valuable source of information. The Council has never discussed plans to prepare its own TiP report.

In 2009 the Council agreed to establish an Informal EU Network of National Rapporteurs or Equivalent Mechanisms on Trafficking in Human Beings in order to facilitate the exchange of best practices in relation to combating trafficking in human beings. The main aim of this Network is to improve understanding of the phenomenon of trafficking in human beings and to provide the Union and its Member States with objective, reliable, comparable and up-to-date strategic information. The Network is open to EU institutions and EU agencies as well as relevant international institutions such as the UN.

In line with Article 19 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims (176), National rapporteurs or equivalent mechanisms are responsible for monitoring the implementation of anti-trafficking policy at the national level and play a key role in data collection on trafficking at both national and EU Level. Their tasks include assessing trends in trafficking in human beings, measuring the results of anti-trafficking measures, including the collection of statistics, in close cooperation with relevant civil society organisations active in this field, and reporting. The Presidency, in cooperation with the Commission, coordinates the activities of the network and chairs the meetings. The network meets approximately every six months, and the European Parliament is invited to attend these meetings.

In order to contribute to a coordinated and consolidated Union strategy in this area, Member States also facilitate the tasks of an anti-trafficking coordinator (ATC) by sending relevant information on the basis of which the ATC contributes to reporting carried out by the Commission every two years on the progress made in the fight against trafficking in human beings.

Finally, the ‘EU Strategy towards the Eradication of Trafficking in Human Beings (2012-2016) (177)’, followed up by Council Conclusions, adopted in October 2012, focuses on specific measures that support and complement the implementation of EU legislation on trafficking in human beings.

(Deutsche Fassung)

Anfrage zur schriftlichen Beantwortung P-005377/14

an die Kommission

Franziska Keller (Verts/ALE)

(23. April 2014)

Betrifft: Nach dem Urteil des Gerichtshofs zur Vorratsdatenspeicherung: Einreise-/Ausreisesystem

Das jüngste Urteil des Gerichtshofs zur Vorratsdatenspeicherung wirft ernsthafte Fragen hinsichtlich der Verhältnismäßigkeit des geplanten Einreise-/Ausreisesystems (EES) auf. Gemäß dem EES müssten sich die meisten Drittstaatsangehörigen bei der Einreise in die EU oder der Ausreise aus der EU registrieren lassen und dabei personenbezogene Daten angeben. Ebenfalls geplant sind die Registrierung von Fingerabdrücken sowie die Anbindung des Visa-Informationssystems, das unter anderem personenbezogene Daten und biometrische Daten enthält, an das EES. Diskutiert wird ferner, ob Strafverfolgungsbehörden zu Strafverfolgungszwecken Zugang zu den Daten gewährt werden soll. Nach Schätzungen der Kommission wären jährlich 70 Millionen nicht visumpflichtige Reisende vom EES betroffen.

Darüber hinaus kann zu Strafverfolgungszwecken auf verschiedene andere sich auf Ausländer beziehende EU-Datenbanken zugegriffen werden, insbesondere auf die Eurodac-Datenbank, in der personenbezogene Daten, einschließlich biometrischer Daten von Asylsuchenden, gespeichert sind, sowie auf das Visa-Informationssystem mit personenbezogenen Daten von Visumantragstellern.

Der Gerichtshof hat in seinem Urteil deutlich gemacht, dass die Massenspeicherung personenbezogener Daten unverhältnismäßig ist, wenn sich die Personen, deren Daten auf Vorrat gespeichert werden, auch nur mittelbar in einer Lage befinden, die Anlass zu einer Strafverfolgung geben könnte. Kann die Kommission angesichts dieses Urteils Folgendes mitteilen:

Antwort von Frau Malmström im Namen der Kommission

(14. Juli 2014)

Das Urteil des Gerichtshofs der Europäischen Union (EuGH) in den verbundenen Rechtssachen C-293/12 und C-594/12 hat keine direkte Wirkung auf andere Rechtsinstrumente der EU. Es befasst sich mit einer ganz bestimmten Rechtsgrundlage, der Richtlinie über die Vorratsspeicherung von Daten, in Bezug auf die unter diese Richtlinie fallenden Arten von Telekommunikationsdaten.

Die Kommission hat nicht die Absicht, die Eurodac-Verordnung aufzuheben oder dem Zugriff von Strafverfolgungsbehörden auf das Visa-Informationssystem (VIS) ein Ende zu setzen. Die bestehenden, im Hinblick auf Zweck und Anwendungsbereich begrenzten Instrumente legen klare und strenge Regeln für den Datenzugang und die Verarbeitung von Daten fest und bieten wirksame Datenschutzgarantien.

Die Kommission beabsichtigt auch nicht, den EES-Vorschlag zurückzuziehen oder die diesbezügliche Studie zu stoppen. Sie hat nicht vorgeschlagen, dass zu Strafverfolgungszwecken ab der Inbetriebnahme des Systems Zugang zum EES gewährt wird. Nach dem Vorschlag sollte zwei Jahre nach dem Start des EES-Systems in einer Bewertung geprüft werden, welchen Beitrag das Einreise-/Ausreisesystem im Kampf gegen terroristische und sonstige schwerwiegende Straftaten leisten kann. Dabei sind die Erfahrungen mit dem Zugang der Strafverfolgungsbehörden zum Visa-Informationssystem zu berücksichtigen. Sollte der Zugang zu Strafverfolgungszwecken gewährt werden, so müssten entsprechend dem Urteil des Gerichtshofs besondere Garantien eingeführt werden.

(English version)

Question for written answer P-005377/14

to the Commission

Franziska Keller (Verts/ALE)

(23 April 2014)

Subject: Post Court of Justice data retention decision: entry/exit system

The recent judgment of the Court of Justice on data retention raises serious questions on the proportionality of the envisaged entry/exit system (EES). The EES would require most third-country nationals to register using personal data when entering or leaving the EU. Registration of fingerprints is also envisaged, as is linking the visa information system, which includes personal data and biometrics of visa holders, with the EES. Granting law enforcement agencies access to the data for law enforcement purposes is also discussed. According to Commission estimates, the EES would affect 70 million visa-free travellers per year.

In addition, several other EU databases related to foreigners allow for law enforcement access, in particular the Eurodac database, in which personal data including biometrics of asylum-seekers is stored, and the visa information system with the personal data of visa applicants.

In its ruling, the Court of Justice made it clear that the mass storage of personal data ‘without the persons whose data are retained being, even indirectly, in a situation which is liable to give rise to criminal prosecutions’ is disproportionate. In the light of this ruling:

Answer given by Ms Malmström on behalf of the Commission

(14 July 2014)

The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Joined Cases C-293/12 and C-594/12 has no direct effect on other EU legal instruments. It addresses a very specific legal instrument, i.e. the Data Retention Directive, in relation to the types of telecommunications data covered under that directive.

The Commission is not planning to repeal the Eurodac Regulation nor to terminate law enforcement access to the Visa Information System (VIS). The existing instruments, which are limited in purpose and scope, set out clear and strict rules for access to and processing of data and provide for effective data protection safeguards.

The Commission does also not intend to withdraw the EES proposal nor to stop the related study. The Commission did not propose law enforcement access to the EES as from the start of its operation. The proposal sets out that an evaluation, two years after the start of EES operations, should examine the contribution the entry-exit system could make in the fight against terrorist and other serious criminal offences, taking into account the experience with law enforcement access to the VIS. Should access for law enforcement purposes be granted, the necessary specific safeguards would need to be introduced in line with the Court's reasoning.

(Deutsche Fassung)

Anfrage zur schriftlichen Beantwortung E-005380/14

an die Kommission

Hiltrud Breyer (Verts/ALE)

(23. April 2014)

Betrifft: Größte Giftmülldeponie Europas: Weiterbetrieb trotz fehlender Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung

Die im ehemaligen Sperrgebiet der DDR gelegene größte Giftmülldeponie Europas Schöneberg/Ihlenberg nahm im Jahre 1979 ohne einen Standortsicherheitsnachweis den Betrieb auf. Mehrere Wasserwerke in der Umgebung wurden inzwischen geschlossen. Gegen eine geplante Erweiterung auf 32 Millionen Tonnen hat der NABU Klage eingereicht.

Antwort von Herrn Potočnik im Namen der Kommission

(14. Juli 2014)

Zu Punkt 1: Im vorliegenden Fall kommt die Richtlinie 2011/92/EU über die Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung bei bestimmten öffentlichen und privaten Projekten (178) nicht zur Anwendung, da das betreffende Projekt vor Inkrafttreten dieser Richtlinie genehmigt und in Betrieb genommen wurde.

Zu Punkt 2: Das Genehmigungsverfahren ist Sache der Mitgliedstaaten, und die Kommission sammelt keine Daten über erteilte Genehmigungen und deren Inhalt. Da die Existenz der betreffenden Deponie von den deutschen Behörden an die entsprechenden EU-Datenbanken (E-PRTR) gemeldet wurde und im Bericht zur Abfallwirtschaft des Landes Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (179) erfasst ist, hat die Kommission keinen Grund zur Annahme, dass die Deponie ohne Genehmigung arbeitet, und anderslautende Informationen liegen der Kommission nicht vor. Dies schließt aber nicht aus, dass die Kommission die Frage eingehender prüfen wird, sollte sie künftig konkrete Anhaltspunkte für einen möglichen Verstoß gegen das EU-Umweltrecht erhalten.

Zu den Punkten 3 und 4: Deutschland hat seine Bewirtschaftungspläne für die Einzugsgebiete (180) innerhalb der in der Wasserrahmenrichtlinie (181) gesetzten Frist (d. h. im Dezember 2009) vorgelegt. Die Pläne enthalten die in dieser Richtlinie vorgesehenen Maßnahmenprogramme. Die Maßnahmen dürften seit 2013 in Gang sein; bis Ende 2015 muss ein guter Gewässerzustand erreicht sein.

Zu den Punkten 5 und 6: Für die Deponie wurden keine EFRE-Fördermittel gewährt. Es gibt keine Obergrenze für die Förderung aus dem EFRE, sofern der Haushaltsrahmen eingehalten wird; ab 2014 gelten — in Einklang mit Artikel 4 der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1301/2013 — lediglich Bestimmungen für die thematische Konzentration der EFRE-Fördermittel.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005380/14

to the Commission

Hiltrud Breyer (Verts/ALE)

(23 April 2014)

Subject: Continued operation of largest toxic landfill site in Europe despite failure to carry out an environmental impact assessment

The largest toxic landfill site in Europe, located in what was a previously the GDR restricted area of Schöneberg/Ihlenberg, opened in 1979 without any site safety certification. A number of waterworks in the area have since been closed down and the Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Unit (NABU) has lodged a protest against plans to increase the landfill site capacity to 32 million tonnes.

Answer given by Mr Potočnik on behalf of the Commission

(14 July 2014)

3 and 4. Germany submitted its river basin management plans (184) by the deadline given in the Water Framework Directive (185) (i.e. December 2009). The German river basin management plans contain programmes of measures as required by that directive. The measures should have been operational from 2013 and good status of waters has to be achieved by the end of 2015.

5 and 6. There was no ERDF-support granted to the landfill. There is no limitation of support within the ERDF as long as the budgetary framework is respected; as from 2014 on, there are only concentration criteria in line with Article 4 of Regulation (EU) Nr. 1301/2013 as to which thematic areas ERDF support should be spent on.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005397/14

to the Commission

Diane Dodds (NI)

(23 April 2014)

Subject: Recent protests in Donetsk

Given the recent protests in Donetsk, what steps are being taken by the Commission to help protect Ukrainian sovereignty in the city, and wider region, from being undermined by further Russian agitation?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(15 July 2014)

The EU Heads of State and Government have underlined in their Statement of 27 May 2014 to stand firm in upholding Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. They stressed that the efforts by all sides should aim at solving the crisis politically, putting an end to violence and tensions in Eastern Ukraine, including disarmament of illegal armed groups. They underlined that they expect the Russian Federation to use its leverage on the armed separatists to de-escalate the situation in Eastern Ukraine and to prevent the crossing of separatists and weapons into Ukraine. (186)

Moreover, the EU Foreign Ministers on 12 May 2014 agreed to expand the criteria allowing individuals and entities to be subject to visa ban and asset freeze, allowing for the possible listing of natural persons responsible for actively supporting or implementing actions or policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, or stability or security in Ukraine, or which obstruct the work of international organisations in Ukraine (187).

(Magyar változat)

Írásbeli választ igénylő kérdés E-005398/14

a Bizottság számára

Gál Kinga (PPE)

(2014. április 23.)

Tárgy: Gyermek jogainak figyelmen kívül hagyása bírósági eljárás során

Fiona Shaw, magyar édesanya és francia édesapa gyermekének ügye a gyermek érdekeinek teljes figyelmen kívül hagyása és az elfogatóparancs hibás alkalmazásának kategóriájába tartozik. A Franciaországban zajló bírósági eljárás során teljes egészében figyelmen kívül hagyták a kiskorú gyermek érdekeit, testi és lelki épségének megőrzését. Sérült a Magyarországon élő édesanya tisztességes eljáráshoz való joga, a hatóságok folyamatosan vétettek az eljárásban részt vevő édesanya jogai ellen:

Mit tud tenni a Bizottság annak érdekében, hogy egy tagállam hatóságai minden esetben jóhiszeműen, a gyermek érdekeinek mindenkori figyelembevételével járjanak el az egyes ügyekben? Mivel tudja elősegíteni a Bizottság, hogy Fiona Shaw ügye mihamarabb, a gyermek számára kielégítő módon rendeződjön?

Johannes Hahn válasza a Bizottság nevében

(2014. július 4.)

A Bizottság sajnálatosnak tartja az eset körülményeit, amelyet a visszatérési eljárás szakaszában vizsgált meg. Mindazonáltal hatásköre nem terjed ki arra, hogy helyettesítsen a nemzeti bíróság által egy egyedi esetben készített jogi értékelést a láthatási jogokra vonatkozóan. Amennyiben az édesanya nem találja kielégítőnek a gyermek láthatására vonatkozó jelenlegi megoldást, az illetékes bíróságnál kérelmezheti annak módosítását. A hatékony végrehajtás biztosítása érdekében az anya támogatást igényelhet az érintett tagállam központi hatóságaitól. Ezen túlmenően a polgári és kereskedelmi ügyekben illetékes Európai Igazságügyi Hálózat platformot biztosít az ilyen hatóságoknak az ügyek során felmerülő nehézségek megoldására.

A Bizottság számára hasznosak a szóban forgó üggyel kapcsolatos információk, és azokat figyelembe fogja venni az uniós jog végrehajtásának nyomon követése során. A Bizottság nemrégiben elfogadta a szülői felelősségről szóló 2001/2003/EK rendeletre, illetve az iratkézbesítésről szóló 1393/2007/EK rendeletre vonatkozó értékelő jelentést. Az esetleges javításokról és azok mikéntjéről további konzultációkat követően fog döntést hozni. A szülői felelősséggel kapcsolatos szabályok esetleges hiányosságainak feltérképezését célzó nyilvános konzultáció már jelenleg is folyik.

Az európai elfogatóparancsot illetően a Schengeni Információs Rendszerről (SIS II) szóló, 2007. évi határozat értelmében az európai elfogatóparancshoz kapcsolódó SIS II figyelmeztető jelzést a kiadásától számítva legfeljebb három év elteltével törlik, kivéve, ha a jelzést kiadó tagállam továbbra is fenn kívánja azt tartani. Maga az európai elfogatóparancs vagy az annak alapjául szolgáló nemzeti elfogatóparancs kiadásának esetleges felülvizsgálata azonban a nemzeti jog hatálya alá tartozik. A felmerülő nehézségekkel elsősorban a szakértői ülések és a büntetőügyekben illetékes Európai Igazságügyi Hálózat ülései keretében foglalkoznak.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005398/14

to the Commission

Kinga Gál (PPE)

(23 April 2014)

Subject: Disregard for a child's rights in legal proceedings

In the case of Fiona Shaw — the child of a Hungarian mother and a French father — the child’s rights have been entirely disregarded, while the Arrest Warrant has also been misused. During the legal proceedings in France, the young child’s interests and her physical and mental health have been entirely ignored. The right of the mother, living in Hungary, to equitable legal proceedings was breached, and the authorities constantly infringed the rights of the mother, who was a party to the proceedings:

What can the Commission do to compel the authorities in a Member State to act in good faith in every case, and in the child’s interests at all times, in individual cases? How can the Commission help secure a resolution of Fiona Shaw’s case as soon as possible in a manner satisfactory to the child?

Answer given by Mr Hahn on behalf of the Commission

(4 July 2014)

The Commission regrets the circumstances of the case which it closely examined at the return procedure stage. However, it is not within the remit of its functions to substitute the appraisal made by a national court with respect to an access rights determination in an individual case. If the mother is not satisfied with the current access rights arrangements over the child, she may seek their modification before the competent court. To secure their effective exercise, she may seek the assistance of the Central Authorities in the Member States concerned. In addition, the European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters offers a platform to such authorities to solve difficulties in specific cases.

The information on this case is useful to the Commission and will be taken into account in its monitoring of the implementation of EC law. Recently, it adopted evaluation reports on Regulations No 2001/2003 on parental responsibility and No 1393/2007 on the service of documents. After further consultations, it will be decided if and how they may be improved. In particular, a public consultation is ongoing to identify possible shortcomings notably in parental responsibility matters.

As concerns the European arrest warrant, the 2007 Schengen Information System (SIS II) Decision provides that when a SIS II alert on a European arrest warrant is launched, the alert is deleted after three years maximum unless the issuing Member State maintains it. However, the possible review of the issuance itself of a European arrest warrant or of the national arrest warrant on which it is based is governed by national law. Any difficulties encountered are in particular discussed at expert meetings and meetings of the European Judicial Network in criminal matters.

(Ελληνική έκδοση)

Ερώτηση με αίτημα γραπτής απάντησης E-005423/14

προς την Επιτροπή

Antigoni Papadopoulou (S&D)

(23 Απριλίου 2014)

Θέμα: Βελτίωση των όρων χρηματοδότησης των Μικρομεσαίων Επιχειρήσεων

Το Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο, στην έκθεσή του σχετικά με τη μακροπρόθεσμη χρηματοδότηση της ευρωπαϊκής οικονομίας (2013/2175(INI)), συνιστά, μεταξύ άλλων, στην Ευρωπαϊκή Τράπεζα Επενδύσεων (ΕΤΕπ) «να συγκροτήσει έναν ειδικό κλάδο για τη χρηματοδότηση ΜΜΕ με εξατομικευμένους δανειακούς όρους» (Παράγραφος 37).

Ερωτάται η Επιτροπή:

Απάντηση του κ. Kallas εξ ονόματος της Επιτροπής

(9 Ιουλίου 2014)

Το Ευρωπαϊκό Ταμείο Επενδύσεων (ΕΤΕ) — που ιδρύθηκε το 1994 — αποτελεί θυγατρική της Ευρωπαϊκής Τράπεζας Επενδύσεων (ΕΤΕπ). Το ΕΤΕ ειδικεύεται στη χρηματοδότηση των ΜΜΕ και διαχειρίζεται ευρύ φάσμα χρηματοδοτικών μέσων της ΕΕ, που παρέχουν μετοχικό κεφάλαιο και εγγυήσεις για λογαριασμό της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής.

Στα συμπεράσματά του της 19ης/20ής Δεκεμβρίου 2013, το Ευρωπαϊκό Συμβούλιο υπογράμμισε ότι «η αποκατάσταση της κανονικής δανειακής ροής στην οικονομία, και ειδικότερα στις ΜΜΕ, παραμένει προτεραιότητα» και εξέφρασε ικανοποίηση «για την εφαρμογή της αύξησης κεφαλαίου της ΕΤΕπ που επιτρέπει στην τράπεζα να αυξήσει τον δανεισμό σε όλη την ΕΕ κατά 38%, δηλαδή μέχρι 62 δισεκ. εφέτος». Επίσης, εξέφρασε ικανοποίηση για «τη στήριξη του Ομίλου ΕΤΕπ, κατά το 2013, ύψους 23,1 δισεκ. ευρώ για ΜΜΕ και εταιρείες μεσαίας κεφαλαιοποίησης στην ΕΕ των 28». Ο Όμιλος ΕΤΕπ αποτελείται από την ΕΤΕπ και το ΕΤΕ.

Το Ευρωπαϊκό Συμβούλιο κάλεσε επίσης την Επιτροπή και την ΕΤΕπ «να ενισχύσουν περισσότερο τις δυνατότητες του ΕΤΕ, αυξάνοντας τα κεφάλαιά του, με σκοπό την επίτευξη τελικής συμφωνίας μέχρι τον Μάιο του 2014». Στη συνέχεια, το Συμβούλιο εξέδωσε, στις 6 Μαΐου 2014, απόφαση του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου σχετικά με τη συμμετοχή της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης στην αύξηση του κεφαλαίου του ΕΤΕ. Η αύξηση του κεφαλαίου από 3 δισεκ. ευρώ σε 4,5 δισεκ. ευρώ, η οποία πρόκειται να εγκριθεί σύντομα από τη Γενική Συνέλευση των Μετόχων του ΕΤΕ, στοχεύει στη διατήρηση της ανάπτυξης στο πλαίσιο των δραστηριοτήτων του ΕΤΕ προς στήριξη των ΜΜΕ.

Επιπλέον, η ΕΤΕπ δημιούργησε ένα νέο χρηματοδοτικό σχήμα, ύψους 4 δισεκ. ευρώ για την επόμενη 7ετία, το λεγόμενο «EIB Group Risk Enhancement Mandate (EREM)», ως συμπλήρωμα της προσφοράς εγγυήσεων και τόνωσης πιστώσεων του ETE, προκειμένου να ανακουφιστούν τα προβλήματα χρηματοδότησης των ΜΜΕ και να προωθηθεί η ευρωπαϊκή οικονομία.

Η Επιτροπή παραπέμπει επίσης την κυρία βουλευτή στις απαντήσεις της στις γραπτές ερωτήσεις E-013771-13, E-013293/2013, E-002695/2013 και P-013727/2013.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005423/14

to the Commission

Antigoni Papadopoulou (S&D)

(23 April 2014)

Subject: Better terms for the funding of small and medium-sized enterprises

In its report on long-term financing of the European economy (2013/2175(INI)), the European Parliament ‘recommends that the EIB set up a special branch for SME funding with tailor-made loan conditions’ (paragraph 37).

Answer given by Mr Kallas on behalf of the Commission

(9 July 2014)

The European Investment Fund (EIF) — set up in 1994 — is a subsidiary of the European Investment Bank (EIB).The EIF is specialised in SME finance and manages a wide range of EU financial instruments providing equity and guarantees on behalf of the European Commission.

In its conclusions of 19/20 December 2013, the European Council underlined that ‘restoring normal lending to the economy, in particular to SMEs, remains a priority’ and welcomed ‘the implementation of the EIB capital increase enabling the Bank to step up its lending across the EU by 38%, to EUR 62 billion this year.’ It also welcomed ‘the support by the EIB Group in 2013 of EUR 23.1 billion for SME businesses and mid-cap companies throughout the EU 28’. The EIB Group consists of the EIB and the EIF.

The European Council also called on the Commission and the EIB ‘to further enhance the EIF capacity through an increase in its capital with a view to reaching final agreement by May 2014.’ Following this, the Council adopted on 6 May 2014 a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the participation of the European Union in the capital increase of the EIF. The capital increase from EUR 3 billion to EUR 4.5 billion, which is to be adopted shortly by the General Assembly of EIF shareholders, aims to sustain growth in the EIF's activity in support of SMEs.

In addition, a new mandate, the EIB Group Risk Enhancement Mandate for an amount of EUR 4 billion, has been put in place by the EIB to complement EIF’s guarantee and credit enhancement product over the next 7 years, to alleviate the financing problems of SMEs and stimulate Europe’s economy.

The Commission would also refer the Honourable Member to its replies to written questions E-013771-13, E-013293/2013, E-002695/2013 and P-013727/2013.

(Ελληνική έκδοση)

Ερώτηση με αίτημα γραπτής απάντησης E-005427/14

προς την Επιτροπή

Antigoni Papadopoulou (S&D)

(23 Απριλίου 2014)

Θέμα: Σχετικά με την ερώτησή μου αρ. E-014065/2013

Σε απάντησή της στην πιο πάνω ερώτησή μου, η Επιτροπή αναφέρεται στα συμπεράσματα του Συμβουλίου της 17ης Δεκεμβρίου 2013, «στα οποία τονίζεται ότι η Τουρκία πρέπει να δεσμευθεί ανεπιφύλακτα σε καλές σχέσεις γειτονίας και στην ειρηνική επίλυση διαφορών σύμφωνα με το Χάρτη των Ηνωμένων Εθνών, με προσφυγή, εφόσον απαιτείται, στο Διεθνές Δικαστήριο. Η Ένωση εξέφρασε σοβαρές ανησυχίες και κάλεσε την Τουρκία να αποφύγει κάθε είδους απειλή ή ενέργεια κατά κράτους μέλους, ή κάθε πηγή προστριβών ή ενεργειών που θα μπορούσαν να βλάψουν τις σχέσεις καλής γειτονίας και την ειρηνική διευθέτηση των διαφορών».

Ερωτάται η Επιτροπή:

Απάντηση του κ. Füle εξ ονόματος της Επιτροπής

(10 Ιουλίου 2014)

Η Επιτροπή εξακολουθεί να παρακολουθεί τα ζητήματα που έθεσε η κ. βουλευτής και θα αναφερθεί σχετικά στην ετήσια έκθεση προόδου για την Τουρκία.

Η εκτίμηση της Επιτροπής είναι ότι ο πιο κατάλληλος τρόπος για την αντιμετώπιση των ζητημάτων αυτών παραμένει η ενίσχυση της συνεργασίας της ΕΕ με την Τουρκία. Ταυτόχρονα, η Τουρκία θα μπορέσει να επιταχύνει τον ρυθμό των διαπραγματεύσεων μέσω, μεταξύ άλλων, της τήρησης των συμβατικών της υποχρεώσεων έναντι της ΕΕ.

Η Επιτροπή θα συνεχίσει να απαιτεί την απόλυτη προσήλωση της Τουρκίας στις σχέσεις καλής γειτονίας και στην ειρηνική επίλυση των διαφορών σύμφωνα με τον Χάρτη των Ηνωμένων Εθνών, προσφεύγοντας, εφόσον το κρίνει αναγκαίο, στο Διεθνές Δικαστήριο.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005427/14

to the Commission

Antigoni Papadopoulou (S&D)

(23 April 2014)

Subject: Question for written answer No E-014065/2013

In answer to the above question, the Commission referred to the Council conclusions of 17 December 2013, stating that Turkey needs to commit itself unequivocally to good neighbourly relations and to the peaceful settlement of disputes in accordance with the United Nations Charter, having recourse, if necessary, to the International Court of Justice. The Union had expressed serious concern, and urged Turkey to avoid any kind of threat or action directed against a Member State and to avoid any sources of friction or any actions that could damage good neighbourly relations and the peaceful settlement of disputes.

In view of this:

Answer given by Mr Füle on behalf of the Commission

(10 July 2014)

The Commission continues to monitor the issues raised by the Honourable Member and will report on them in its yearly Progress Report on Turkey.

The Commission's assessment is that the most appropriate way to address such issues remains for the EU to enhance its engagement with Turkey. At the same time Turkey will be able to accelerate the pace of negotiations by inter alia respecting its contractual obligations towards the EU.

The Commission will continue to insist that Turkey commits itself unequivocally to good neighbourly relations and to the peaceful settlement of disputes in accordance with the United Nations Charter, having recourse, if necessary to the International Court of Justice.

(Version française)

Question avec demande de réponse écrite E-005437/14

à la Commission

Sonia Alfano (ALDE)

(23 avril 2014)

Objet: Représentations nationales au sein de la Commission

La Commission pourrait-elle me fournir des statistiques détaillées sur la part de chaque nationalité parmi les chefs d'unité de l'ensemble des directions générales, ainsi que dans les cabinets des commissaires, sous les Commissions Barroso I et Barroso II?

Réponse donnée par M. Šefčovič au nom de la Commission

(16 juillet 2014)

La Commission transmet directement à l'Honorable Parlementaire et au secrétariat du Parlement un tableau contenant les informations demandées au sujet des chefs de cabinets des commissaires.

En vertu de l'article 7 du statut des fonctionnaires, ceux-ci sont nommés à leur poste, qu'il s'agisse de fonctions d'encadrement ou non, sans considération de nationalité. Par conséquent, la Commission estime qu'il n'est pas pertinent de diffuser des informations concernant la nationalité des chefs d'unité.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-005437/14

alla Commissione

Sonia Alfano (ALDE)

(23 aprile 2014)

Oggetto: Rappresentanti nazionali in seno alla Commissione

Può la Commissione fornire statistiche dettagliate sulla nazionalità dei capiunità dell'insieme delle DG, nonché dei gabinetti dei commissari sotto le Commissioni Barroso I et Barroso II?

Risposta di Maroš Šefčovič a nome della Commissione

(16 luglio 2014)

La Commissione invia direttamente all'onorevole deputato e al segretariato del Parlamento una tabella contenente le informazioni richieste sui capi di gabinetto dei commissari.

A norma dell'articolo 7 dello statuto, i funzionari sono nominati a un determinato posto, direttivo o non direttivo, senza tener conto della nazionalità. La Commissione, quindi, non ritiene pertinente divulgare informazioni sulla nazionalità dei capi unità.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005437/14

to the Commission

Sonia Alfano (ALDE)

(23 April 2014)

Subject: Nationalities represented in the Commission

Can the Commission provide a detailed statistical breakdown of the nationalities of heads of unit in all directorates-general, and in Commissioners' private offices, under the Barroso I and Barroso II Commissions?

Answer given by Mr Šefčovič on behalf of the Commission

(16 July 2014)

The Commission is sending directly to the Honourable Member and to Parliament’s Secretariat a table containing the requested information concerning the Heads of Commissioners' private offices.

Pursuant to Article 7 of the Staff Regulations, officials are appointed to a post, either of management or not, without regard to nationality. Therefore, the Commission does not consider it relevant to disseminate information about nationality of Heads of Unit.

(Verżjoni Maltija)

Mistoqsija għal tweġiba bil-miktub E-005484/14

lill-Kummissjoni

Marlene Mizzi (S&D)

(24 ta' April 2014)

Suġġett: Nies b'diżabilitajiet

Fir-rigward tal-Konvenzjoni tan-NU tal-2006 li tikkonċerna nies b'livelli varji ta' diżabilità, x'inhi tagħmel il-Kummissjoni biex tgħin dawn in-nies ħalli jgħixu stil ta' ħajja indipendenti?

Tweġiba mogħtija mis-Sur Hahn f'isem il-Kummissjoni

(11 ta' Lulju 2014)

Il-Kummissjoni tistieden lill-Onorevoli Membru sabiex jirreferi għat-tweġibiet tagħha għall-mistoqsijiet bil-miktub E-010955/2013 u E-005073/2014. (188)

Il-proposta tal-Kummissjoni rigward ir-Regolament dwar il-Fond Soċjali Ewropew imsemmi fit-tweġiba għall-mistoqsija bil-miktub E-010955/2013 wasslet għall-adozzjoni tar-Regolament (UE) Nru 1304/2013 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tas-17 ta’ Diċembru 2013 dwar il-Fond Soċjali Ewropew u li jħassar ir-Regolament tal-Kunsill (KE) Nru 1081/2006. (189) L-Artikolu 3 (b) (iv) ta’ dan ir-Regolament jidentifika “t-titjib tal-aċċess għal servizzi affordabbli, sostenibbli u ta' kwalità għolja, inklużi servizzi tal-kura tas-saħħa u servizzi soċjali ta' interess ġenerali” bħala waħda mis-sitt prijoritajiet ta’ investiment sabiex jintlaħaq l-għan li jiġu promossi l-inklużjoni soċjali u l-ġlieda kontra l-faqar u kull diskriminazzjoni.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005484/14

to the Commission

Marlene Mizzi (S&D)

(24 April 2014)

Subject: People with disabilities

In view of the 2006 UN Convention which concerns people with various levels of disability, what is the Commission doing to help these people live an independent lifestyle?

Answer given by Mr Hahn on behalf of the Commission

(11 July 2014)

The Commission would refer the Honourable Member to its answers to written questions E-010955/2013 and E-005073/2014. (190)

The Commission's proposal for the European Social Fund Regulation mentioned in the answer to the Written Question E-010955/2013 has resulted in the adoption of Regulation (EU) No 1304/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Social Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006. (191) Article 3 (b) (iv) of this regulation identifies ‘enhancing access to affordable, sustainable and high quality services including healthcare and social services of general interest’ as one of the six investment priorities for achieving the objective of promoting social inclusion and combating poverty and any discrimination.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-005491/14

alla Commissione

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(24 aprile 2014)

Oggetto: Progetto Next Generation Identification

In seguito a una richiesta avanzata in sede legale dalla Electronic Frontier Foundation, è stato svelato che il Federal bureau of investigation sta compilando una banca dati che raccoglie milioni di dati biometrici relativi a milioni di persone, incensurate e non: si tratta di informazioni quali impronte digitali, impronte del palmo della mano, scansione dell'iride, biometria dei volti, al fine di creare dei profili individuali per ogni persona «misurata». Si tratta del programma Next Generation Identification, una sorta di schedatura di massa che verrà condivisa con altre agenzie federali e forze dell'ordine statunitensi.

Può la Commissione europea chiarire se:

Risposta di Johannes Hahn a nome della Commissione

(7 luglio 2014)

Il diritto dell'UE non è applicabile al trattamento dei dati a fini dell'applicazione della legge che viene svolto esclusivamente negli Stati Uniti. Qualora i dati personali sottoposti a trattamento negli Stati Uniti provengano dall'UE, il caso può rientrare nel campo di applicazione della decisione quadro 2008/977/GAI del Consiglio, che si applica al trasferimento dei dati personali oggetto di scambio tra gli Stati membri dell'UE. In alternativa o in aggiunta, i dati possono essere stati trasferiti in virtù di un accordo tra gli Stati Uniti e uno Stato membro dell'UE, ad esempio un accordo di mutua assistenza giudiziaria o in materia di prevenzione di reati gravi, nel qual caso le disposizioni di tali accordi devono essere rispettate.

La riforma della protezione dei dati dell'UE, in particolare la direttiva sulla protezione dei dati per la polizia e le autorità giudiziarie penali, mira a rafforzare la protezione dei dati personali degli individui, garantendo nel contempo un'efficace cooperazione in materia di applicazione della legge. Inoltre, la Commissione sta negoziando dal 2011 con gli Stati Uniti un accordo quadro sulla protezione dei dati nel settore della cooperazione giudiziaria e di polizia («accordo quadro»). La Commissione mira a garantire un elevato livello di protezione per i cittadini dell'UE quando i loro dati siano trattati da parte delle autorità statunitensi. I cittadini dell'UE dovrebbero anche godere del diritto alla parità di trattamento con i cittadini degli Stati Uniti per quanto riguarda l'esecutività dei loro diritti, compreso il ricorso giudiziario.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005491/14

to the Commission

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(24 April 2014)

Subject: Next Generation Identification Project

Following a court petition filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, it has been revealed that the Federal Bureau of Investigation is compiling a data base with millions of biometric details on millions of people, whether or not they have criminal backgrounds. The information includes fingerprints, palm prints, iris scans and facial biometrics, the aim being to create individual profiles for each person ‘measured’. The project, known as Next Generation Identification, involves the creation of a kind of mass police record that will be shared with other US federal agencies and police departments.

Answer given by Mr Hahn on behalf of the Commission

(7 July 2014)

EC law is not applicable to data processing for law enforcement purposes which takes place only in the US. Should personal data processed in the US originate from the EU, it may fall within the scope of Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA. This decision is applicable to the transfer of personal data which has been exchanged between EU Member States. Alternatively or additionally, the data may have been transferred pursuant to an agreement between the US and an EU Member State, for example on Mutual Legal Assistance or the Prevention of Serious Crime, in which case the provisions of those agreements must be respected.

The EU data protection reform, in particular the Data Protection Directive for Police and Criminal Justice Authorities, aims at strengthening the protection of personal data of individuals while ensuring effective law enforcement cooperation. In addition, the Commission has been negotiating with the US since 2011 on a framework agreement on data protection in the field of police and judicial cooperation (the ‘umbrella’ agreement). The Commission aims to ensure a high level of data protection for individuals in the EU when their data is processed by US authorities. EU citizens should also have equal treatment with US citizens regarding the enforceability of their rights, including judicial redress.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-005492/14

alla Commissione

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(24 aprile 2014)

Oggetto: Recupero degli spazi verdi nelle aree urbane

Diverse città italiane contano numerosi spazi verdi, concepiti per essere destinati alla ricreazione della cittadinanza. Sfortunatamente queste aree verdi sono spesso trascurate e lasciate in uno stato di abbandono che spesso risulta in accumuli di rifiuti di ogni tipo, da resti di materiale edile a copertoni abbandonati, carcasse di automobili e così via. Questa situazione conduce a molteplici conseguenze negative, come il degrado urbano, l'inquinamento, lo spreco di risorse naturali, turistiche ed economiche, anche se non esiste una stima precisa. Queste aree potrebbero essere sfruttate per essere attrezzate con aree ristoro, aree fitness, servizi per i turisti o altre soluzioni alternative che, oltre a ripristinare il decoro urbano, permetterebbero lo sviluppo di nuove attività economiche.

Può la Commissione chiarire:

Risposta di Johannes Hahn a nome della Commissione

(27 giugno 2014)

Per il periodo 2007-2013 il Fondo europeo di sviluppo regionale (FESR) ha potuto finanziare strategie di sviluppo urbano sostenibile che comprendessero, tra l'altro, il recupero degli spazi verdi nelle aree urbane.

Per quanto concerne il periodo 2014-2020, almeno il 5 % delle risorse nazionali a valere sul FESR devono essere dedicate ad azioni integrate per lo sviluppo urbano sostenibile che potrebbero anche comportare progetti ambientali. I principi per la selezione delle aree urbane e l'importo indicativo da stanziare per le azioni in questione devono essere stabiliti dagli Stati membri nei loro accordi di partenariato. Le discussioni nel merito tra la Commissione e gli Stati membri sono ancora in corso.

La Commissione ha pubblicato lo studio «Urban development in the EU» (192). Esso presenta 50 progetti che hanno ricevuto un investimento dal FESR e offre esempi di buone pratiche in città selezionate riportando informazioni dettagliate sui progetti e sui loro risultati.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005492/14

to the Commission

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(24 April 2014)

Subject: Regeneration of green spaces in urban areas

Many Italian cities have a large number of green spaces, which were intended to be used for recreational purposes. Unfortunately, these green spaces are often neglected and in a state of disrepair, and are often full of rubbish of all kinds, from leftover building materials to tyres, burnt-out cars, etc. This has numerous negative effects, including urban decay, pollution and wastage of natural, tourist and financial resources, although there are no accurate statistics as to the extent of such effects. These areas could be regenerated to accommodate areas for relaxation, fitness, tourist services or other solutions which, as well as revitalising our cities, would allow new businesses to be established.

Can the Commission clarify:

Answer given by Mr Hahn on behalf of the Commission

(27 June 2014)

For the 2007-2013 period, the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) could co-finance sustainable urban development strategies that can include, inter alia, the regeneration of green spaces in urban areas.

With respect to the 2014-2020 period, at least 5% of the ERDF national resources need to be dedicated to integrated actions for sustainable urban development that could also include environmental projects. The principles for the selection of the urban areas and an indicative allocation for the actions envisaged need to be established by the Member States in their partnership agreements. The discussions between the Commission and the Member States in this respect are still on-going.

The Commission published a study ‘Urban development in the EU’ (193). It presents 50 projects which received ERDF investment and offers examples of good practice from selected cities, with detailed information on projects and results.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-005493/14

alla Commissione

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(24 aprile 2014)

Oggetto: Sharka, il nuovo virus delle drupacee

Il settore frutticolo della Basilicata si trova ad affrontare un grave problema, relativo all'epidemia di sharka, virus letale che colpisce le drupacee, ovvero piante da susino, albicocco e pesco. Il virus, oltre a deteriorare il frutto sino ad impedirne la commercializzazione, causa il deperimento della pianta e, non raramente, la sua morte. Relativamente a quella che si prospetta come una grave perdita per il comparto in questione, sono state diramate linee guida, da enti competenti, finalizzate alla divulgazione di strategie di contenimento del fenomeno, dei suoi effetti nocivi. In particolare, si invitano i produttori a un monitoraggio stringente delle coltivazioni e alla selezione accurata degli innesti provenienti da vivaio.

Alla luce di quanto illustrato, può la Commissione:

Risposta di Tonio Borg a nome della Commissione

(12 giugno 2014)

Nell'Unione europea (UE) il virus della vaiolatura delle drupacee, agente causale della malattia Sharka che colpisce le drupacee, è disciplinato come organismo nocivo da quarantena. Esso è compreso nella direttiva fitosanitaria dell'UE (194) come organismo nocivo la cui presenza è stata rilevata nell'Unione e la cui introduzione e diffusione in tutti gli Stati membri è vietata qualora venga individuato su determinate piante. Inoltre, tali piante devono rispettare prescrizioni particolari prima di poter essere introdotte o spostate all'interno dell'Unione, al fine di garantire che siano indenni da tale organismo nocivo. Ogni Stato membro è tenuto a comunicare immediatamente alla Commissione e agli altri Stati membri la comparsa del virus in una parte del suo territorio in cui tale presenza non era stata ancora riscontrata, nonché a prendere tutte le misure necessarie per l'eradicazione del focolaio della malattia. Dalle informazioni fornite dall'Organizzazione europea e mediterranea per la protezione delle piante, disponibili tramite la sua banca dati mondiale (195), emerge che il virus della vaiolatura delle drupacee è presente in 22 Stati membri.

Una recente analisi del rischio fitosanitario nell'UE per il virus della vaiolatura della drupacee effettuata dai Paesi Bassi (196) rileva che tale organismo nocivo ha un elevato impatto economico sulla produzione di drupacee.

L'attuale regolamentazione dell'UE per il virus della vaiolatura delle drupacee come organismo nocivo da quarantena è volta a limitarne l'effetto all'interno dell'Unione. Tuttavia l'attuale approccio normativo dell'UE contro questo organismo nocivo, essendo in vigore da tempo, è al momento in fase di valutazione per tener conto dell'attuale situazione del virus all'interno dell'UE. Per tale valutazione viene utilizzata come base l'analisi del rischio fitosanitario di cui sopra.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005493/14

to the Commission

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(24 April 2014)

Subject: Sharka, the new pome fruit virus

The fruit-growing sector in the Basilicata region is faced with a serious problem in the form of an epidemic of the lethal sharka virus, which affects pome fruit, i.e. plums, apricots and peaches. As well as causing the fruit to decay to such an extent that it can no longer be sold, the virus causes the plant to wither and, not uncommonly, to die. In the face of what is expected to be a crisis for the sector in question, guidelines have been issued by the competent authorities in an effort to disseminate strategies for containing the phenomenon and to indicate the damage it causes. Producers are being asked in particular to monitor their crops carefully and to take care when selecting grafts from nursery stock.

In this context, can the Commission:

Answer given by Mr Borg on behalf of the Commission

(12 June 2014)

Plum pox virus, the causal agent of the stone fruit disease sharka, is regulated as a quarantine pest in the European Union (EU). It is listed in the EU plant health Directive (197) as a pest known to occur in the Union, the introduction of which into, and spread within, all Member States is banned if it is found on certain plants. In addition, those plants need to fulfil special requirements before they can be introduced into, or moved within, the Union to make sure that they are free of this pest. Each Member State is required to notify immediately the Commission and the other Member States of the appearance of plum pox virus in a part of its territory in which its presence was previously unknown, as well as to take any necessary measures to eradicate the outbreak. Information from the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation, available through the EPPO Global Database (198), shows that plum pox virus is present in 22 Member States.

A recent EU Pest Risk Analysis for plum pox virus prepared by the Netherlands (199) reports a high economic impact of this pest on stone fruit production.

The current EU regulation of plum pox virus as a quarantine pest aims at limiting the impact of this pest in the Union. However, since the current EU regulatory approach against this pest has been in place for a long time, this approach is currently being evaluated, to take into account the present situation of this pest in the EU. The Pest Risk Analysis mentioned above is used as the technical basis for this evaluation.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-005494/14

alla Commissione (Vicepresidente/Alto Rappresentante)

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(24 aprile 2014)

Oggetto: VP/HR — Incidenti alla spianata delle Moschee

Nella mattinata del 16 Aprile c.a., in seguito all'irruzione di alcune decine di palestinesi, la spianata delle Moschee è stata chiusa ai visitatori. I palestinesi di cui sopra hanno lanciato pietre e petardi contro le forze di sicurezza.

Alla luce di quanto sopra, può la Commissione fornire informazioni in merito alle dinamiche dei disordini e all'eventuale presenza di cittadini europei fra i visitatori della spianata (specie in riferimento a possibili ferimenti occorsi)?

Risposta dell’Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente Catherine Ashton a nome della Commissione

(24 giugno 2014)

L’Unione europea ha seguito da vicino gli eventi del 16 aprile 2014.

In base alle informazioni pervenuteci, non risulta che alcun cittadino dell’UE sia rimasto ferito nei disordini avvenuti sulla spianata delle Moschee.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005494/14

to the Commission (Vice-President/High Representative)

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(24 April 2014)

Subject: VP/HR — Incidents on the Temple Mount

On the morning of 16 April 2004, following the invasion of dozens of Palestinians, the Temple Mount was closed to visitors. The Palestinians threw stones and firecrackers at the security forces.

In light of the above, can the Vice-President/High Representative provide information on the dynamics of the unrest and say whether any European citizens were among the visitors at the Temple Mount at the time (especially if any were injured)?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(24 June 2014)

The EU has followed closely the events of 16 April 2014.

The EU has not received any reports that any EU citizens were hurt in the incidents on the Haram-Al-Sharif/Temple Mount.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-005495/14

alla Commissione

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(24 aprile 2014)

Oggetto: Incidente ferroviario in India

Il deragliamento di un treno nella regione settentrionale di Assam, in India, ha causato il ferimento di cinquanta passeggeri, di cui diciassette gravi.

Le cause dell'incidente (16 aprile 2014) sono tuttora sconosciute. I primi soccorsi hanno provveduto ad assicurare le prime cure a vittime e passeggeri.

Alla luce di quanto sopra, può la Commissione fornire informazioni in merito alle dinamiche dell'incidente e riguardo alla presenza di cittadini europei fra i passeggeri del treno?

Risposta data dall'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente Catherine Ashton a nome della Commissione

(5 giugno 2014)

La Commissione è a conoscenza dello sfortunato incidente ferroviario su cui l'onorevole parlamentare chiede chiarimenti. Il SEAE non dispone di ulteriori informazioni oltre a quelle disponibili attraverso le fonti di stampa.

La delegazione dell'UE in India non è stata informata dell'eventuale coinvolgimento di cittadini dell'UE nell'incidente. In ogni caso tutti gli Stati membri dell'UE hanno una rappresentanza diplomatica in India e sarebbero eventualmente intervenuti per garantire assistenza consolare ai propri cittadini in difficoltà.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005495/14

to the Commission

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(24 April 2014)

Subject: Railway accident in India

The derailment of a train in the northern region of Assam, in India, has led to around 50 passengers being injured, 17 of whom seriously.

The causes of the accident (on 16 April 2014) are as yet unknown. The emergency and rescue services provided first aid to victims and passengers.

Can the Commission provide any information on the dynamics of the accident and whether any EU citizens were among the passengers on the train?

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(5 June 2014)

The Commission is aware of the unfortunate railway accident about which the Honourable Member inquires. The EEAS has no further information beyond that available through press sources.

The EU Delegation in India has not been informed of any EU citizen being involved. In any case all EU Member States have a diplomatic mission in India and would have ensured consular assistance to their citizens in distress.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-005497/14

alla Commissione (Vicepresidente/Alto Rappresentante)

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(24 aprile 2014)

Oggetto: VP/HR — Nigeria: oltre cento studentesse rapite

Una notizia recente riferisce del rapimento di oltre cento studentesse in Nigeria. Le milizie fondamentaliste, irrompendo nella struttura scolastica, hanno avuto la meglio sui militari dispiegati a tutela della stessa. Nella mattinata erano in corso gli esami di stato. Gli istituti scolastici continuano a essere uno dei bersagli privilegiati dalla fazione terroristica (sia in relazione alla loro vulnerabilità che in merito ai principi democratici che rappresentano).

In seguito a quanto sopra, può il Vicepresidente/Alto Rappresentante:

Risposta dell'Alta Rappresentante/Vicepresidente Catherine Ashton a nome della Commissione

(19 giugno 2014)

L'Unione europea condanna fermamente il rapimento di più di 200 studentesse nello Stato nordorientale del Borno e ne ha chiesto il rilascio immediato e incondizionato.

Il 14 aprile si è verificato un rapimento a Chibok, nel quale sono state sequestrate oltre 200 studentesse, e il 6 maggio ha avuto luogo un secondo rapimento nel villaggio di Warabe, in cui sono state rapite altre 11 ragazze.

Come riportato dai mezzi di comunicazione, Boko Haram — che ha rivendicato i rapimenti — intende scambiare le ragazze rapite contro alcuni ribelli appartenenti al gruppo catturati dalle forze armate nigeriane.

Come dichiarato dal Consiglio, l'UE appoggia l'intenzione del Consiglio di sicurezza dell'ONU di valutare misure appropriate da prendere nei confronti di Boko Haram, misure infine adottate il 22 maggio.

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005497/14

to the Commission (Vice-President/High Representative)

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(24 April 2014)

Subject: VP/HR — Nigeria — over 100 female students abducted

According to recent news reports, more than 100 female students have been abducted in Nigeria. The fundamentalist militias forced their way into the girls’ school, getting the better of the soldiers deployed to protect it. That morning state exams were being taken. Schools continue to be one of the prime targets of the terrorist faction (with regard to both their vulnerability and the democratic principles they represent).

Can the High Representative/Vice-President therefore:

Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission

(19 June 2014)

The European Union strongly condemns the abduction of more than 200 schoolgirls in the north eastern state of Borno and has called for their immediate and unconditional release.

There was one abduction in Chibok on 14 April where more than 200 school girls got kidnapped and a second, so far, on 6 May where another 11 girls were abducted from the village of Warabe.

As stated in media reports, Boko Haram — who has claimed responsibility for the abductions — wants to exchange the abducted girls against Boko Haram insurgents captured by the Nigerian military.

As expressed by the Council, the EU supports the intention of the UN Security Council to consider appropriate measures against Boko Haram as it finally happened on 22 May.

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-005498/14

alla Commissione

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(24 aprile 2014)

Oggetto: Rifornimento delle falde acquifere: un progetto pilota

Un progetto pilota implementato in Emilia Romagna provvede a dar corso a strategie atte a favorire la ricarica artificiale delle falde acquifere in siti che risentono di un penalizzante assetto idrogeologico.

Nello specifico, il sistema messo a punto ovvia ad un problema di dispersione delle acque piovane attraverso il percorso dei fiumi, sino ai bacini marittimi. Inoltre, il progetto mira a dotare le zone interessate di efficienti strutture di gestione delle scorte idriche in tal modo immagazzinate.

In seguito a quanto sopra, si chiede alla Commissione se può:

Risposta di Janez Potočnik a nome della Commissione

(13 giugno 2014)

La ricarica artificiale delle falde acquifere è praticata in tutto il mondo — anche in diversi Stati membri — per diversi scopi. Tuttavia, la Commissione non dispone di informazioni sulla realizzazione o sui risultati di specifici progetti analoghi a quello descritto nell'interrogazione.

Il rifornimento delle falde viene discusso in diversi forum, come ad esempio l'Associazione internazionale degli idrogeologi (200).

(English version)

Question for written answer E-005498/14

to the Commission

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(24 April 2014)

Subject: Pilot project for the replenishment of aquifers

A pilot project in Emilia Romagna is paving the way for the artificial replenishment of aquifers in areas with an unfavourable hydrogeological structure.

The system has been developed to tackle the problem of loss of rainwater from the land as it flows, via rivers, to the sea. The project aims to equip the affected areas with efficient structures for managing water supplies stored in aquifers.

Therefore, can the Commission:

Answer given by Mr Potočnik on behalf of the Commission

(13 June 2014)

The managed recharge of aquifers is practised throughout the world including several Member States for different purposes but the Commission does not have information on the implementation or results of specific projects similar to the one described in the question.

This practice is discussed in several fora, for example in the International Association of Hydrogeologists (201).

(Versione italiana)

Interrogazione con richiesta di risposta scritta E-005499/14

alla Commissione

Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris (PPE)

(24 aprile 2014)

Oggetto: Visite mediche su Skype per pazienti con difficoltà motorie

Un buon esempio di impiego delle nuove tecnologie al servizio dei cittadini è offerto dalla Gran Bretagna, che si dota delle potenzialità di Skype per facilitare l'accesso a visite ambulatoriali.

I medici di base potranno offrire le loro prestazioni on line raggiungendo soprattutto quegli assistiti che presentano maggiori problemi di mobilità. A quanto detto si aggiunge anche il fatto che gli orari di accesso alle unità ambulatoriali verranno estesi sino a sera inoltrata. In tal modo si permette ai lavoratori di poter consultare il proprio medico generico. Ovviamente questa non è comunque una soluzione definitiva al problema dell'accessibilità dei servizi sanitari per le persone a ridotta mobilità.

In seguito a quanto sopra, si chiede alla Commissione: