|
7.11.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 267/27 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Haarlem (Netherlands), lodged on 16 July 2009 — Premis Medical BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane Rotterdam, kantoor Rotterdam Laan op Zuid
(Case C-273/09)
2009/C 267/49
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Rechtbank Haarlem
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Premis Medical BV
Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane Rotterdam, kantoor Rotterdam Laan op Zuid
Questions referred
|
1. |
Is Commission Regulation (EC) No 729/2004 (1) of 15 April 2004, published on 20 April 2004 in Official Journal of the European Union L 113, page 5, with a corrigendum published on 7 May 2004 in Official Journal of the European Union L 173, page 9, valid in the sense that the annex contained in the corrigendum is the valid annex? If so: |
|
2. |
Is Commission Regulation (EC) No 729/2004 of 15 April 2004, published on 20 April 2004 in Official Journal of the European Union L 113, page 5, with a corrigendum published on 7 May 2004 in Official Journal of the European Union L 173, page 9, invalid on the ground that the Commission has restricted the scope of heading 9021 in that regulation? If the regulation is valid: |
|
3. |
Is Commission Regulation (EC) No 729/2004 of 15 April 2004, published on 20 April 2004 in Official Journal of the European Union L 113, page 5, with a corrigendum published on 7 May 2004 in Official Journal of the European Union L 173, page 9, invalid on the ground that the Commission has incorrectly classified the rollator in the CN? |
(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 729/2004 of 15 April 2004 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2004 L 113, p. 5).